Literature DB >> 24472675

Evaluation of five selective media for the detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa using a strain panel from clinical, environmental and industrial sources.

Rebecca Weiser1, Denise Donoghue2, Andrew Weightman3, Eshwar Mahenthiralingam3.   

Abstract

Isolation and correct identification of the opportunistic pathogen and industrial contaminant Pseudomonas aeruginosa are very important and numerous selective media are available for this purpose. A novel comparison of five selective media having positive (acetamide-based agars), negative (Pseudomonas CN selective agar [Oxoid Ltd.] and Pseudomonas Isolation agar [Sigma-Aldrich Company Ltd.]) and chromogenic (chromID® P. aeruginosa [bioMérieux]) selection strategies was performed using a systematically designed bacterial test panel (58 P. aeruginosa and 90 non-P. aeruginosa strains including those commonly misidentified as P. aeruginosa by culture-dependent techniques). Standardised inocula were added to the selective media and the results were recorded after 24 and 72h. After 72h of incubation at 37°C chromID® P. aeruginosa displayed the highest specificity (70%) and had good sensitivity (95%), although the sensitivity was negatively impacted by the large variation in colour of P. aeruginosa colonies, which hampered interpretation. Both media containing inhibitory selective agents performed very similarly, both having 100% sensitivity and a specificity of approximately 30%. Raising the incubation temperature to 42°C increased the specificity of Pseudomonas CN selective agar and Pseudomonas isolation agar (61% and 47% respectively after 72h), but increased the number of false positives encountered with the chromogenic medium, decreasing its specificity to 68% after 72h. Growth on the acetamide agars was weak for all strains and it was often difficult to determine whether true growth had occurred. This, compounded by the low specificity of the acetamide agars (<26%), suggested they were less suitable for application to clinical or industrial settings without further modification. Overall, the chromogenic agar was the most selective but further consideration is required to optimise interpretation of results.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Culture-dependent detection; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Selective media

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24472675     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2014.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  10 in total

Review 1.  A Decade of Development of Chromogenic Culture Media for Clinical Microbiology in an Era of Molecular Diagnostics.

Authors:  John D Perry
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Cinnamomum tamala (Tejpata) leaf and their potential application to control multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from hospital drainage water.

Authors:  Md Abdullah Al Mashud; Md Moinuzzaman; Md Shamim Hossain; Sabbir Ahmed; Galib Ahsan; Abu Reza; Robayet Bin Anwar Ratul; Md Helal Uddin; Md Abdul Momin; Mohammad Abu Hena Mostofa Jamal
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-07-09

3.  Not all Pseudomonas aeruginosa are equal: strains from industrial sources possess uniquely large multireplicon genomes.

Authors:  Rebecca Weiser; Angharad E Green; Matthew J Bull; Edward Cunningham-Oakes; Keith A Jolley; Martin C J Maiden; Amanda J Hall; Craig Winstanley; Andrew J Weightman; Denise Donoghue; Alejandro Amezquita; Thomas R Connor; Eshwar Mahenthiralingam
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2019-06-06

4.  Molecular detection and antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from houseflies (Musca domestica) in Iran.

Authors:  Behsan Hemmatinezhad; Davood Ommi; Taghi Taktaz Hafshejani; Faham Khamesipour
Journal:  J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis       Date:  2015-05-30

5.  Enrichment experiment changes microbial interactions in an ultra-oligotrophic environment.

Authors:  Gabriel Y Ponce-Soto; Eneas Aguirre-von-Wobeser; Luis E Eguiarte; James J Elser; Zarraz M-P Lee; Valeria Souza
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Development of uracil-DNA-glycosylase-supplemented loop-mediated isothermal amplification coupled with nanogold probe (UDG-LAMP-AuNP) for specific detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Orapan Manajit; Siwaporn Longyant; Paisarn Sithigorngul; Parin Chaivisuthangkura
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.952

7.  Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in dogs and cats.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; José Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Barbara Padalino; Paolo Pasquali; Helen Clare Roberts; Hans Spoolder; Karl Ståhl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Francesca Baldinelli; Alessandro Broglia; Lisa Kohnle; Julio Alvarez
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-05-03

Review 8.  Understanding the challenges of non-food industrial product contamination.

Authors:  Edward Cunningham-Oakes; Rebecca Weiser; Tom Pointon; Eshwar Mahenthiralingam
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.742

9.  Construction and evaluation of a bioluminescent Pseudomonas aeruginosa reporter for use in preservative efficacy testing.

Authors:  Laura Rushton; Denise Donoghue; Matthew Bull; Peter Jay; Eshwar Mahenthiralingam
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.777

10.  Evaluation of GeneXpert PA assay compared to genomic and (semi-)quantitative culture methods for direct detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in endotracheal aspirates.

Authors:  Thomas Ewout van der Schalk; Jasmine Coppens; Leen Timbermont; Agata Turlej-Rogacka; Liesbet Van Heirstraeten; Matilda Berkell; Li Yu; Christine Lammens; Basil Britto Xavier; Veerle Matheeussen; Margareta Ieven; Michael McCarthy; Philippe G Jorens; Alexey Ruzin; Mark T Esser; Samir Kumar-Singh; Herman Goossens; Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 4.887

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.