Haleh Ghooshkhanei1, Giorgio Treglia2, Golnaz Sabouri1, Rozita Davoodi1, Ramin Sadeghi3. 1. Patient Safety Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT Centre, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland. Electronic address: giorgiomednuc@libero.it. 3. Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. Electronic address: sadeghir@mums.ac.ir.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In the current study, we systematically searched and analyzed the available literature on the prognostic value of semi-quantitative (18)F-FDG PET imaging (SUVmax/mean) in patients with endometrial cancer and presenting the results in a meta-analytic format. METHODS: Pubmed, SCOPUS, and ISI Web of Knowledge were searched using "endometr* AND PET" as the search algorithm. All studies evaluating the (18)F-FDG PET performance in pre-operative risk stratification or its prognostic value in patients with endometrial cancer were included. Statistical pooling of diagnostic accuracy indices was performed using random effects model. Cochrane Q test and I(2) index were used for heterogeneity evaluation. RESULTS: Ten studies (771 patients) were included in the systematic review. Pooled average SUVmax values in patients with risk factors [grade III, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), cervical invasion (CI), myometrial invasion (MI)≥50%] were statistically higher than those in patients without risk factors. Pooled HR of pre-operative SUVmax for disease free survival was 7.415 [2.892-19.432] (p=0.000046). CONCLUSION: Despite higher average SUVmax in the high-risk group compared to the low-risk group of patients with endometrial cancer, the usefulness of (18)F-FDG PET SUVmax in classifying patients into pre-defined risk groups seems to be limited. However, pre-operative SUVmax of endometrial tumors seems to be an independent prognostic marker of recurrence and death. Further large multicenter studies with adequate follow-up are needed to confirm our findings.
OBJECTIVES: In the current study, we systematically searched and analyzed the available literature on the prognostic value of semi-quantitative (18)F-FDG PET imaging (SUVmax/mean) in patients with endometrial cancer and presenting the results in a meta-analytic format. METHODS: Pubmed, SCOPUS, and ISI Web of Knowledge were searched using "endometr* AND PET" as the search algorithm. All studies evaluating the (18)F-FDG PET performance in pre-operative risk stratification or its prognostic value in patients with endometrial cancer were included. Statistical pooling of diagnostic accuracy indices was performed using random effects model. Cochrane Q test and I(2) index were used for heterogeneity evaluation. RESULTS: Ten studies (771 patients) were included in the systematic review. Pooled average SUVmax values in patients with risk factors [grade III, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), cervical invasion (CI), myometrial invasion (MI)≥50%] were statistically higher than those in patients without risk factors. Pooled HR of pre-operative SUVmax for disease free survival was 7.415 [2.892-19.432] (p=0.000046). CONCLUSION: Despite higher average SUVmax in the high-risk group compared to the low-risk group of patients with endometrial cancer, the usefulness of (18)F-FDG PET SUVmax in classifying patients into pre-defined risk groups seems to be limited. However, pre-operative SUVmax of endometrial tumors seems to be an independent prognostic marker of recurrence and death. Further large multicenter studies with adequate follow-up are needed to confirm our findings.
Authors: Nicole Concin; Carien L Creutzberg; Ignace Vergote; David Cibula; Mansoor Raza Mirza; Simone Marnitz; Jonathan A Ledermann; Tjalling Bosse; Cyrus Chargari; Anna Fagotti; Christina Fotopoulou; Antonio González-Martín; Sigurd F Lax; Domenica Lorusso; Christian Marth; Philippe Morice; Remi A Nout; Dearbhaile E O'Donnell; Denis Querleu; Maria Rosaria Raspollini; Jalid Sehouli; Alina E Sturdza; Alexandra Taylor; Anneke M Westermann; Pauline Wimberger; Nicoletta Colombo; François Planchamp; Xavier Matias-Guiu Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 4.064