Literature DB >> 24472328

Early benefit assessment of new drugs in Germany - results from 2011 to 2012.

Helmut Hörn1, Katrin Nink2, Natalie McGauran3, Beate Wieseler4.   

Abstract

Rising drug costs in Germany led to the Act on the Reform of the Market for Medicinal Products (AMNOG) in January 2011. For new drugs, pharmaceutical companies have to submit dossiers containing all available evidence to demonstrate an added benefit versus an appropriate comparator therapy. The Federal Joint Committee (G-BA), the main decision-making body of the statutory healthcare system, is responsible for the overall procedure of "early benefit assessment". The Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) largely conducts the dossier assessments, which inform decisions by the G-BA on added benefit and support price negotiations. Of the 25 dossiers (excluding orphan drugs) assessed until 31 December 2012, 14 contained sufficient data from randomized active-controlled trials investigating patient-relevant outcomes or at least acceptable surrogates; 11 contained insufficient data. The most common indications were oncology (6) and viral infections (4). For the 14 drugs assessed, the extent of added benefit was rated as minor, considerable, and non-quantifiable in 3, 8, and 2 cases; the remaining drug showed no added benefit. Despite some shortcomings, for the first time it has been possible in Germany to implement a systematic procedure for assessing new drugs at market entry, thus providing support for price negotiations and informed decision-making for patients, clinicians and policy makers.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (German) Act on the Reform of the Market for Medicinal Products (AMNOG); Comparative effectiveness research; Dossier assessment; Early benefit assessment; New drugs

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24472328     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  13 in total

1.  The definition and role of quality of life in Germany's early assessment of drug benefit: a qualitative approach.

Authors:  David Lohrberg; Matthias Augustin; Christine Blome
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Four years of early benefit assessment of new drugs in Germany: a qualitative study on methodological requirements for quality of life data.

Authors:  Christine Blome; Matthias Augustin; Hidayet Metin; David Lohrberg
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2016-02-02

3.  Information on new drugs at market entry: retrospective analysis of health technology assessment reports versus regulatory reports, journal publications, and registry reports.

Authors:  Michael Köhler; Susanne Haag; Katharina Biester; Anne Catharina Brockhaus; Natalie McGauran; Ulrich Grouven; Heike Kölsch; Ulrike Seay; Helmut Hörn; Gregor Moritz; Kerstin Staeck; Beate Wieseler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-02-26

4.  Benefit assessment in Germany: implications for price discounts.

Authors:  Ulrike Theidel; J-Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2016-08-02

5.  The correlation between HTA recommendations and reimbursement status of orphan drugs in Europe.

Authors:  Paweł Kawalec; Anna Sagan; Andrzej Pilc
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.123

6.  Biometrical issues in the analysis of adverse events within the benefit assessment of drugs.

Authors:  Ralf Bender; Lars Beckmann; Stefan Lange
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 1.894

7.  Inconsistent approaches of the G-BA regarding acceptance of primary study endpoints as being relevant to patients - an analysis of three disease areas: oncological, metabolic, and infectious diseases.

Authors:  Thomas Staab; Georg Isbary; Volker E Amelung; Jörg Ruof
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Early Benefit Assessments in Oncology in Germany: How Can a Clinically Relevant Endpoint Not Be Relevant to Patients?

Authors:  Jörg Ruof; Olivier Flückiger; Niko Andre
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2015-09

9.  Comparison of post-authorisation measures from regulatory authorities with additional evidence requirements from the HTA body in Germany - are additional data requirements by the Federal Joint Committee justified?

Authors:  Jörg Ruof; Thomas Staab; Charalabos-Markos Dintsios; Jakob Schröter; Friedrich Wilhelm Schwartz
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2016-09-29

10.  Determination of the target population in early benefit assessments in Germany: challenges for non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  C Ten Thoren; C Balg; J Gibbert; S Mostardt; M Ripoll; D Schierbaum; S Schiller; A Schwalm
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2020-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.