Literature DB >> 24472215

Zero-inflated models for identifying disease risk factors when case detection is imperfect: application to highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 in Thailand.

Timothée Vergne1, Mathilde C Paul2, Wanida Chaengprachak3, Benoit Durand4, Marius Gilbert5, Barbara Dufour6, François Roger7, Suwicha Kasemsuwan8, Vladimir Grosbois7.   

Abstract

Logistic regression models integrating disease presence/absence data are widely used to identify risk factors for a given disease. However, when data arise from imperfect surveillance systems, the interpretation of results is confusing since explanatory variables can be related either to the occurrence of the disease or to the efficiency of the surveillance system. As an alternative, we present spatial and non-spatial zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) regressions for modelling the number of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 outbreaks that were reported at subdistrict level in Thailand during the second epidemic wave (July 3rd 2004 to May 5th 2005). The spatial ZIP model fitted the data more effectively than its non-spatial version. This model clarified the role of the different variables: for example, results suggested that human population density was not associated with the disease occurrence but was rather associated with the number of reported outbreaks given disease occurrence. In addition, these models allowed estimating that 902 (95% CI 881-922) subdistricts suffered at least one HPAI H5N1 outbreak in Thailand although only 779 were reported to veterinary authorities, leading to a general surveillance sensitivity of 86.4% (95% CI 84.5-88.4). Finally, the outputs of the spatial ZIP model revealed the spatial distribution of the probability that a subdistrict could have been a false negative. The methodology presented here can easily be adapted to other animal health contexts.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Avian influenza H5N1; Bias; Capture–recapture; Conditional autoregressive model; Count; Evaluation; Risk factors; Spatial; Surveillance; Under-detection; Zero-inflation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24472215     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  5 in total

1.  Risk Prediction of Three Different Subtypes of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Outbreaks in Poultry Farms: Based on Spatial Characteristics of Infected Premises in South Korea.

Authors:  Dae-Sung Yoo; Byung Chul Chun; Kwan Hong; Jeehyun Kim
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-05-31

2.  Movement and contact patterns of long-distance free-grazing ducks and avian influenza persistence in Vietnam.

Authors:  Anne Meyer; Tung Xuan Dinh; Thu Van Nhu; Long Thanh Pham; Scott Newman; Thuy Thi Thanh Nguyen; Dirk Udo Pfeiffer; Timothée Vergne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Bayesian Spatial Joint Model for Disease Mapping of Zero-Inflated Data with R-INLA: A Simulation Study and an Application to Male Breast Cancer in Iran.

Authors:  Naeimehossadat Asmarian; Seyyed Mohammad Taghi Ayatollahi; Zahra Sharafi; Najaf Zare
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Modelling the Spatial Distribution of ASF-Positive Wild Boar Carcasses in South Korea Using 2019-2020 National Surveillance Data.

Authors:  Jun-Sik Lim; Timothée Vergne; Son-Il Pak; Eutteum Kim
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Use of a voluntary testing program to study the spatial epidemiology of Johne's disease affecting dairy herds in Minnesota: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  K S T Kanankege; G Machado; L Zhang; B Dokkebakken; V Schumann; S J Wells; A M Perez; J Alvarez
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.741

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.