Literature DB >> 2447217

Comparison of bone marrow progenitors responsive to granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor and macrophage colony stimulating factor-1.

L A Falk1, S N Vogel.   

Abstract

The responsiveness of bone marrow progenitors (BMP) from C3H mice to highly purified or recombinant preparations of Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor-1 (CSF-1) and Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) was compared by counting the number of colonies (greater than or equal to 50 cells) after 10 days in culture with CSF. Cells responsive to CSF-1 or GM-CSF exhibited maximum colony formation over a wide dose range, although GM-CSF supported colony formation at lower concentrations. The response of BMP to optimal concentrations of CSF-1 was greater than or equal to 5 times greater than the response of BMP to GM-CSF. Analysis of the kinetics of colony formation revealed that, at day 5, the number of BMP responsive to GM-CSF or CSF-1 was approximately equal; the number of CSF-1 colonies increased significantly through day 10, while those cultured in GM-CSF did not. The response of BMP to CSF-1 and GM-CSF was also studied in liquid culture; the differences in yield of mature macrophages was consistent with the differences observed in agar culture. Although both cell populations were shown to be 100% mononuclear by day 7, Coulter Channelyzer analysis of these mature macrophages showed marked differences in cell size distribution. By day 7, cells grown in CSF-1 resulted in a homogeneous population of large cells, whereas GM-CSF cultures showed a heterogeneous distribution. Finally, CSF-1-derived cells possessed increased nonspecific and specific phagocytic capabilities when compared to GM-CSF-derived macrophages. These findings indicate that the actions of GM-CSF and CSF-1 upon the bone marrow compartment results in the generation of mature macrophages which differ morphologically and functionally and may account for the heterogeneity in macrophage populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2447217     DOI: 10.1002/jlb.43.2.148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Leukoc Biol        ISSN: 0741-5400            Impact factor:   4.962


  10 in total

1.  Differential mechanisms of memory CD8 T cell maintenance by individual myeloid cell types.

Authors:  Loredana Frasca; Spencer W Stonier; Willem W Overwijk; Kimberly S Schluns
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.962

2.  Murine bone marrow-derived macrophages differentiated with GM-CSF become foam cells by PI3Kγ-dependent fluid-phase pinocytosis of native LDL.

Authors:  Joshua J Anzinger; Janet Chang; Qing Xu; Manoj K Barthwal; Thomas Bohnacker; Matthias P Wymann; Howard S Kruth
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 5.922

3.  Production of cytokines and PGE2 and cytotoxicity of stimulated bone marrow macrophages after thermal injury and cytotoxicity of stimulated U-937 macrophages.

Authors:  C K Ogle; X Guo; J Z Wu; J D Ogle
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.092

4.  Thermal injury induces the development of inflammatory macrophages from nonadherent bone marrow cells.

Authors:  C K Ogle; J F Valente; X Guo; B G Li; J D Ogle; J W Alexander
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.092

5.  Preconditioning with high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) induces lipoteichoic acid (LTA) tolerance.

Authors:  Stephen M Robert; Hanna Sjodin; Mitchell P Fink; Rajesh K Aneja
Journal:  J Immunother       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.456

6.  Differential myelopoietic responsiveness of BALB/c (Itys) and C.D2 (Ityr) mice to lipopolysaccharide administration and Salmonella typhimurium infection.

Authors:  V M Peterson; G S Madonna; S N Vogel
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Abnormal differentiation of tissue macrophage populations in 'osteopetrosis' (op) mice defective in the production of macrophage colony-stimulating factor.

Authors:  M Naito; S Hayashi; H Yoshida; S Nishikawa; L D Shultz; K Takahashi
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Preconditioning with high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) induces lipopolysaccharide (LPS) tolerance.

Authors:  Rajesh K Aneja; Allan Tsung; Hanna Sjodin; Julia V Gefter; Russell L Delude; Timothy R Billiar; Mitchell P Fink
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 4.962

9.  PI3K p110γ deletion attenuates murine atherosclerosis by reducing macrophage proliferation but not polarization or apoptosis in lesions.

Authors:  Teresa M Zotes; Cristina F Arias; José J Fuster; Roberto Spada; Sonia Pérez-Yagüe; Emilio Hirsch; Matthias Wymann; Ana C Carrera; Vicente Andrés; Domingo F Barber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Yes-associated protein mediates immune reprogramming in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  S Murakami; D Shahbazian; R Surana; W Zhang; H Chen; G T Graham; S M White; L M Weiner; C Yi
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 9.867

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.