BACKGROUND: Delusional infestation (DI) is a well-recognized clinical entity but there is a paucity of reliable data concerning its epidemiology. Knowledge of the epidemiology is fundamental to an understanding of any disease and its implications. Epidemiology is most accurately assessed using population-based studies, which are most generalizable to the wider population in the U.S. and worldwide. To our knowledge, no population-based study of the epidemiology (particularly incidence) of DI has been reported to date. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of delusional infestation (DI) using a population-based study. METHODS: Medical records of Olmsted County residents were reviewed using the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project to confirm the patient's status as a true incident case of DI and to gather demographic information. Patients with a first-time diagnosis of DI or synonymous conditions between 1 January 1976 and 31 December 2010 were considered incident cases. RESULTS: Of 470 identified possible diagnoses, 64 were true incident cases of DI in this population-based study. The age- and sex-adjusted incidence was 1·9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1·5-2·4] per 100 000 person-years. Mean age at diagnosis was 61·4 years (range 9-92 years). The incidence of DI increased over the four decades from 1·6 (95% CI 0·6-2·6) per 100 000 person-years in 1976-1985 to 2·6 (95% CI 1·4-3·8) per 100 000 person-years in 2006-2010. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that DI is a rare disease, with incidence increasing across the life span, especially after the age of 40 years.
BACKGROUND:Delusional infestation (DI) is a well-recognized clinical entity but there is a paucity of reliable data concerning its epidemiology. Knowledge of the epidemiology is fundamental to an understanding of any disease and its implications. Epidemiology is most accurately assessed using population-based studies, which are most generalizable to the wider population in the U.S. and worldwide. To our knowledge, no population-based study of the epidemiology (particularly incidence) of DI has been reported to date. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of delusional infestation (DI) using a population-based study. METHODS: Medical records of Olmsted County residents were reviewed using the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project to confirm the patient's status as a true incident case of DI and to gather demographic information. Patients with a first-time diagnosis of DI or synonymous conditions between 1 January 1976 and 31 December 2010 were considered incident cases. RESULTS: Of 470 identified possible diagnoses, 64 were true incident cases of DI in this population-based study. The age- and sex-adjusted incidence was 1·9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1·5-2·4] per 100 000 person-years. Mean age at diagnosis was 61·4 years (range 9-92 years). The incidence of DI increased over the four decades from 1·6 (95% CI 0·6-2·6) per 100 000 person-years in 1976-1985 to 2·6 (95% CI 1·4-3·8) per 100 000 person-years in 2006-2010. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that DI is a rare disease, with incidence increasing across the life span, especially after the age of 40 years.
Authors: Jennifer L St Sauver; Brandon R Grossardt; Cynthia L Leibson; Barbara P Yawn; L Joseph Melton; Walter A Rocca Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Sara A Hylwa; Ashley A Foster; Jessica E Bury; Mark D P Davis; Mark R Pittelkow; J Michael Bostwick Journal: Psychosomatics Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 2.386
Authors: Jennifer L St Sauver; Brandon R Grossardt; Barbara P Yawn; L Joseph Melton; Walter A Rocca Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-03-23 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Michele L Pearson; Joseph V Selby; Kenneth A Katz; Virginia Cantrell; Christopher R Braden; Monica E Parise; Christopher D Paddock; Michael R Lewin-Smith; Victor F Kalasinsky; Felicia C Goldstein; Allen W Hightower; Arthur Papier; Brian Lewis; Sarita Motipara; Mark L Eberhard Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-01-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: John J Kohorst; Christopher H Bailey; Louise K Andersen; Mark R Pittelkow; Mark D P Davis Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 10.282