Literature DB >> 24472068

Evaluation methods for pretransplant oncologic markers and their prognostic impacts in patient undergoing living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Junichi Shindoh1, Yasuhiko Sugawara, Rihito Nagata, Junichi Kaneko, Sumihito Tamura, Taku Aoki, Yoshihiro Sakamoto, Kiyoshi Hasegawa, Tomohiro Tanaka, Norihiro Kokudo.   

Abstract

Tumor markers [alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) or des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin (DCP)] and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) reportedly correlate with long-term outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, no standardized method has been established for evaluating the pretransplant data. One hundred and twenty-four patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) were retrospectively reviewed. The best predictive parameters for tumor recurrence were maximum values for AFP or DCP and 90-day mean values for NLR, respectively, and multivariate analysis confirmed these values were correlated with tumor recurrence. However, receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that discriminative powers were sufficient only in maximum AFP [area under the curve (AUC) 0.88, P < 0.001] and maximum DCP (AUC 0.76, P < 0.001), while mean NLR was less predictive (AUC 0.62, P = 0.20). When incorporating AFP and DCP to the Tokyo criteria (≤5 tumors with each tumor ≤ 5 cm), the presence of at least two of the following factors: (i) beyond the Tokyo criteria, (ii) AFP>250 ng/ml, and (iii) DCP > 450 mAu/ml (>450 ng/ml), was correlated with a worse 5-year disease-free survival rate (20.0% vs. 96.8%, P < 0.001) and 5-year overall survival rate (20.0% vs. 84.0%, P < 0.001). The prognosis of patients undergoing LDLT for HCC strongly relies on maximum AFP or DCP values before transplantation, while the prognostic impact of NLR is limited.
© 2014 Steunstichting ESOT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alpha-fetoprotein; des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin; hepatocellular carcinoma; liver transplantation; neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio; tumor markers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24472068     DOI: 10.1111/tri.12274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Int        ISSN: 0934-0874            Impact factor:   3.782


  21 in total

1.  Combination of morphologic criteria and α-fetoprotein in selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma for liver transplantation minimizes the problem of posttransplant tumor recurrence.

Authors:  Michał Grąt; Oskar Kornasiewicz; Zbigniew Lewandowski; Wacław Hołówko; Karolina Grąt; Konrad Kobryń; Waldemar Patkowski; Krzysztof Zieniewicz; Marek Krawczyk
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Clinical application of protein induced by vitamin K antagonist-II as a biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hao Xing; Cunling Yan; Liming Cheng; Nianyue Wang; Shuyang Dai; Jianyong Yuan; Wenfeng Lu; Zhouchong Wang; Jun Han; Yijie Zheng; Tian Yang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-10-13

Review 3.  Prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma biological behavior in patient selection for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Umberto Cillo; Tommaso Giuliani; Marina Polacco; Luz Maria Herrero Manley; Gino Crivellari; Alessandro Vitale
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: A review.

Authors:  Dong-Wei Xu; Ping Wan; Qiang Xia
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Combinations of biomarkers and Milan criteria for predicting hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Roongruedee Chaiteerakij; Xiaodan Zhang; Benyam D Addissie; Essa A Mohamed; William S Harmsen; Paul J Theobald; Brian E Peters; Joseph G Balsanek; Melissa M Ward; Nasra H Giama; Catherine D Moser; Abdul M Oseini; Naoki Umeda; Sudhakar Venkatesh; Denise M Harnois; Michael R Charlton; Hiroyuki Yamada; Shinji Satomura; Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich; Melissa R Snyder; Terry M Therneau; Lewis R Roberts
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 6.  Living vs. deceased-donor liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Kohei Ogawa; Yasutsugu Takada
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-05-04

Review 7.  Liver transplantation for hepatobiliary malignancies: a new era of "Transplant Oncology" has begun.

Authors:  Taizo Hibi; Osamu Itano; Masahiro Shinoda; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 8.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: outcomes and novel surgical approaches.

Authors:  Gonzalo Sapisochin; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 9.  Liver transplantation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hae Won Lee; Kyung-Suk Suh
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2016-09-25

Review 10.  Elevated Preoperative Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Liver Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Sun; Xiao-Ju Shi; Yu-Guo Chen; Chuan-Lei Wang; Qiang Ma; Guo-Yue Lv
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.