Literature DB >> 24472047

Role of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer: current evidence.

Giorgio Bogani1, Sean C Dowdy, William A Cliby, Fabio Ghezzi, Diego Rossetti, Andrea Mariani.   

Abstract

The aim of the present review is to summarize the current evidence on the role of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. In 1988, the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology recommended surgical staging for endometrial cancer patients. However, 25 years later, the role of lymph node dissection remains controversial. Although the findings of two large independent randomized trials suggested that pelvic lymphadenectomy provides only adjunctive morbidity with no clear influence on survival outcomes, the studies have many pitfalls that limit interpretation of the results. Theoretically, lymphadenectomy may help identify patients with metastatic dissemination, who may benefit from adjuvant therapy, thus reducing radiation-related morbidity. Also, lymphadenectomy may eradicate metastatic disease. Because lymphatic spread is relatively uncommon, our main effort should be directed at identifying patients who may potentially benefit from lymph node dissection, thus reducing the rate of unnecessary treatment and associated morbidity. This review will discuss the role of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer, focusing on patient selection, extension of the surgical procedure, postoperative outcomes, quality of life and costs. The need for new surgical studies and efficacious systemic drugs is recommended.
© 2014 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research © 2014 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic lymphadenectomy; endometrial cancer; pelvic lymphadenectomy; staging; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24472047      PMCID: PMC4364412          DOI: 10.1111/jog.12344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res        ISSN: 1341-8076            Impact factor:   1.730


  57 in total

1.  Combined use of magnetic resonance imaging, CA 125 assay, histologic type, and histologic grade in the prediction of lymph node metastasis in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Yukiharu Todo; Noriaki Sakuragi; Ryutaro Nishida; Takashi Yamada; Yasuhiko Ebina; Ritsu Yamamoto; Seiichiro Fujimoto
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  ACOG practice bulletin, clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists, number 65, August 2005: management of endometrial cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for surgical staging of endometrial cancer: morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  D M Larson; K Johnson; K A Olson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Prospective assessment of the prevalence of pelvic, paraaortic and high paraaortic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Sanjeev Kumar; Karl C Podratz; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez; Sean C Dowdy; Amy L Weaver; Michaela E McGree; William A Cliby; Gary L Keeney; Gillian Thomas; Andrea Mariani
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section diagnosis in stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  E Kucera; C Kainz; A Reinthaller; G Sliutz; S Leodolter; H Kucera; G Breitenecker
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Randomized phase III trial of whole-abdominal irradiation versus doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  Marcus E Randall; Virginia L Filiaci; Hyman Muss; Nick M Spirtos; Robert S Mannel; Jeffrey Fowler; J Tate Thigpen; Jo Ann Benda
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Whole abdominal radiotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of patients with stage III and IV endometrial cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study.

Authors:  Gregory Sutton; Janice H Axelrod; Brian N Bundy; Tapan Roy; Howard D Homesley; John H Malfetano; Borys R Mychalczak; Mary E King
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  J Fanning; Y Tsukada; M S Piver
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Cancer statistics, 2003.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Taylor Murray; Alicia Samuels; Asma Ghafoor; Elizabeth Ward; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Selective pelvic and periaortic lymphadenectomy does not increase morbidity in surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  H D Homesley; N Kadar; R J Barrett; S S Lentz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  38 in total

1.  Survival advantage of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Holm Eggemann; Tanja Ignatov; Katharina Kaiser; Elke Burger; Serban Dan Costa; Atanas Ignatov
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  [Adjuvant IMRT in endometrial carcinoma: the French RTCMIENDOMETRE-study].

Authors:  Robert Förster; Katja Lindel
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 3.  Surgical staging in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Gasparri; Donatella Caserta; Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Andrea Papadia; Michael D Mueller
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Survival benefit of pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in high-grade endometrial carcinoma: a retrospective population-based cohort analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Papathemelis; S Scharl; K Kronberger; M Gerken; A Scharl; A Pauer; M Klinkhammer-Schalke
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 5.  Sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer: comparison of fluorescence dye with traditional radiocolloid and blue.

Authors:  Andrea Papadia; Maria Luisa Gasparri; Alessandro Buda; Michael D Mueller
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Rural-urban differences in surgical treatment, regional lymph node examination, and survival in endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Whitney E Zahnd; Katherine S Hyon; Paula Diaz-Sylvester; Sonya R Izadi; Graham A Colditz; Laurent Brard
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Is mucinous adenocarcinoma of the endometrium a risk factor for lymph node involvement? A multicenter case-control study.

Authors:  Kemal Gungorduk; Aykut Ozdemir; Ibrahim Egemen Ertas; Ilker Selcuk; Ulas Solmaz; Emre Ozgu; Emre Mat; Mehmet Gokcu; Tuba Karadeniz; Serap Akbay; Muzaffer Sanci; Mehmet Mutlu Meydanli; Duygu Ayaz; Tayfun Gungor
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Comparison of a sentinel lymph node and a selective lymphadenectomy algorithm in patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma and limited myometrial invasion.

Authors:  Ane Gerda Zahl Eriksson; Jen Ducie; Narisha Ali; Michaela E McGree; Amy L Weaver; Giorgio Bogani; William A Cliby; Sean C Dowdy; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Andrea Mariani; Mario M Leitao
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Xianghua Yin; Min Shi; Jianbo Xu; Qinhao Guo; Huan Wu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

10.  Gynecologic cancer incidence and mortality among American Indian/Alaska Native women in the Pacific Northwest, 1996-2016.

Authors:  Amanda S Bruegl; Sujata Joshi; Samantha Batman; Mercedes Weisenberger; Elizabeth Munro; Thomas Becker
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.