Literature DB >> 24471848

Is place of birth associated with mode of birth? The effect of hospital on caesarean section rates in a public metropolitan health service.

Mary A Biro1, Michelle Knight, Euan Wallace, Kerrie Papacostas, Christine East.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effects of place of birth on birth outcomes have been examined in several studies both locally and internationally. However, none has examined the impact on caesarean section rates of different level maternity hospitals operating within the one health service. This study aimed to examine the impact of place of (Hospital level 6; 4-5 or 4) on birth outcomes in a large metropolitan health service in Victoria.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study utilising data on births to low-risk first-time mothers during 2010-2011. Data were obtained from the Birthing Outcome System (BOS) database of Monash Health. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were undertaken using logistic regression to examine the association between place of birth and caesarean section.
RESULTS: In this group of low-risk nulliparae, there was evidence of a significant association between place of birth and caesarean section. The lower the acuity of the hospital, the higher the odds for the caesarean section. Compared with the level 6 hospital, the AdjOR for caesarean section at the level 4 hospital was 1.81 (95% CI: 1.37-2.41) and at the level 4-5 hospital, 1.30 (95% CI: 1.0-1.7).
CONCLUSIONS: Low-risk nulliparae in spontaneous labour giving birth at the level 4 hospital in this health service are at significantly increased risk of caesarean section. This may have implications for the organisation and resource management of other level 4 public maternity units. Care in a tertiary (level 6) service may not necessarily equate to the higher rates of intervention reported by others.
© 2013 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Keywords:  caesarean section; obstetrics; place of birth

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24471848     DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  3 in total

1.  Perinatal staff perceptions of safety and quality in their service.

Authors:  Suzanne V Sinni; Euan M Wallace; Wendy M Cross
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Impact of maternity care policy in Catalonia: a retrospective cross-sectional study of service delivery in public and private hospitals.

Authors:  Ramón Escuriet-Peiró; Josefina Goberna-Tricas; Maria J Pueyo-Sanchez; Neus Garriga-Comas; Immaculada Úbeda-Bonet; Carmen Caja-López; Isabel Espiga-López; Vicente Ortún-Rubio
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Transfers of Care between Healthcare Professionals in Obstetric Units of Different Sizes across Spain and in a Hospital in Ireland: The MidconBirth Study.

Authors:  Anna Martín-Arribas; Rafael Vila-Candel; Rhona O'Connell; Martina Dillon; Inmaculada Vila-Bellido; M Ángeles Beneyto; Inmaculada De Molina-Fernández; Nerea Rodríguez-Conesa; Cristina González-Blázquez; Ramón Escuriet
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.