Literature DB >> 24471096

Establishment of quantitative analysis method for genetically modified maize using a reference plasmid and novel primers.

Gi-Seong Moon1, Weon-Sun Shin2.   

Abstract

For the quantitative analysis of genetically modified (GM) maize in processed foods, primer sets and probes based on the 35S promoter (p35S), nopaline synthase terminator (tNOS), p35S-hsp70 intron, and zSSIIb gene encoding starch synthase II for intrinsic control were designed. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products (80~101 bp) were specifically amplified and the primer sets targeting the smaller regions (80 or 81 bp) were more sensitive than those targeting the larger regions (94 or 101 bp). Particularly, the primer set 35F1-R1 for p35S targeting 81 bp of sequence was even more sensitive than that targeting 101 bp of sequence by a 3-log scale. The target DNA fragments were also specifically amplified from all GM labeled food samples except for one item we tested when 35F1-R1 primer set was applied. A reference plasmid pGMmaize (3 kb) including the smaller PCR products for p35S, tNOS, p35S-hsp70 intron, and the zSSIIb gene was constructed for real-time PCR (RT-PCR). The linearity of standard curves was confirmed by using diluents ranging from 2×10(1)~10(5) copies of pGMmaize and the R(2) values ranged from 0.999~1.000. In the RT-PCR, the detection limit using the novel primer/probe sets was 5 pg of genomic DNA from MON810 line indicating that the primer sets targeting the smaller regions (80 or 81 bp) could be used for highly sensitive detection of foreign DNA fragments from GM maize in processed foods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GM-maize; GMO detection; novel primer; processed food; real-time PCR; reference plasmid

Year:  2012        PMID: 24471096      PMCID: PMC3866725          DOI: 10.3746/pnf.2012.17.4.274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Nutr Food Sci        ISSN: 2287-1098


INTRODUCTION

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been broadly used in processed foods worldwide, and for that reason, most consumers are quite concerned about their bio-safety. To alleviate consumer concerns, many countries including the European Union (EU), Korea, and Japan have introduced labeling systems. The threshold levels for unintentional mixing of GMOs in food products are 0.9% in the EU, 3% in Korea, and 5% in Japan (1). According to a report by James (2), global areas of GM crops reached 160 million hectares (395 million acres) in 2011, which exceeded 8% (12 million hectares) over 2010, indicating biotech crops have spread quickly in recent years. In 2011, GM soybeans were the principal biotech crop, which covered 47% of global biotech areas, followed by maize (32%), cotton (15%), and canola (5%). Most of these biotech crops have traits such as herbicide tolerance, insect resistance, or both. At present, many GM maize lines including MON810, GA21, NK603, MON863, DLL25, DBT418, MON88017 (above Monsanto Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), 1507, DAS-59122-7 (above Dupont Co., Wilmington, DE, USA), Bt11, Bt176, Bt10 (above Syngenta Seeds Co., Basel, Switzerland), and T25 (Byer Crop Science Co., Monheim am Rhein, Germany) have been approved for importation by the Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA; http://www.kfda.go.kr/gmo/index.do). To manage the labeling system for GMOs in foods, reliable evaluation methods are essential. To date, many detection methods for GMOs as crops or food ingredients based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR), microarray, and immunoassay have been developed (3–11). Interestingly, Kalogianni et al. (12) reported a method using a dry-reagent DNA biosensor in a disposable dip-stick format for the visual detection and sequence confirmation of GMO by hybridization within minutes. Among the above methods, PCR-based techniques are easily applied and very useful in detecting transgenic regions of GMOs; however, this method has some difficulties to calculate the incorporation rate of GMOs in highly processed foods due to DNA damage and food matrices. To overcome these problems, the preparation of template DNA from food samples and highly sensitive primers targeting small transgenic regions would be primarily necessary. In this study, we designed and evaluated primer and probe sets targeting small transgenic regions of GM maize lines harboring p35S, tNOS, and p35S-hsp70 intron specific for MON810 line. Furthermore, a reference plasmid pGMmaize (3 kb) was constructed for quantification of the target DNA fragments using real-time PCR (RT-PCR) and the sensitivity was evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Maize and food samples

The transgenic maize events, Bt11 and MON810, were kindly provided by Dr. T. Kim from the Korean Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology (Suwon, Korea). As a negative control, non-GM maize was purchased from a local market and proved to be non-GM by PCR method using a GMO detection primer kit (Nippon Gene Co., Fukuyama, Japan). For feasibility test of novel primer and probe sets, processed food samples including corn and corn flour were collected from local markets.

Extraction of genomic DNA

To isolate genomic DNA from the reference GM maize, samples were homogenized by a mortar and pestle under liquid nitrogen. The homogenates were applied to DNeasy Plant Maxi Kit (Qiagen Co., Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instruction with a modification where the incubation time at 65°C was doubled after addition of the initial buffer for lysis. For the isolation of genomic DNA from food samples, a rapid-salt extraction buffer method (EasyPrepTM, NEXGEN Co., Seoul, Korea), a silica resin method (DNeasy plant mini kit, Qiagen Co., Seoul, Korea), and a magnetic bead method (Wizard DNA prep kit, Promega Co., Madison, WI, USA) were combined. In cases of snacks, after homogenization, a large amount of sugar was excluded by diluting with ultrapure water and the resulting centrifugal pellets were dried at 50°C and used for DNA purification. For ham, after homogenization, 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) or hexane was added to the homogenates to get rid of fats and the remains were dried and used for DNA purification. The quantities of isolated DNAs were determined by a UV spectrophotometer (J710, JASCO Co., Tokyo, Japan) at 260 nm.

Oligonucleotide primers and probes

Novel primers and probes based on the published sequences (13,14) and GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) database (GenBank accession no. V00141 and J01541 for p35S, V00087 and J01541 for tNOS, X03658 for hsp70 exon 1, AF019297 for zSSIIb gene) were designed to detect intrinsic or transgenic regions of GM maize lines (Fig. 1) by Primer Express® software v2.0 (Applied Biosystems Co., Foster, CA, USA) and synthesized from TIB MOLBIOL Co. (Berlin, Germany). Taq-Man fluorescent probes were employed in this study and the fluorescent reporter dye, 6-carboxy-fluorescein (FAM), was labeled on the 5′-end and the fluorescent quencher dye, 6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine (TAMRA), was labeled on the 3′-end. The oligonucleotide sequences of primers and probes are shown in Table 1.
Fig. 1

Schematic representation of target regions of primers and probes designed in this study. p35S, 35S promoter region derived from cauliflower mosaic virus; tNOS, the terminator region of nopaline synthase derived from Agrobacterium tumefaciens; hsp70, DNA fragment containing intron no. 1 of hsp70 gene, encoding a heat-shock protein, of maize; cryIA(b), synthetic delta endotoxin gene derived from Bacillus thuringiensis; zSSIIb gene, starch synthase II gene. Asterisks (*) indicate probes.

Table 1

Oligonucleotide primers and probes used in this study

TargetNameSequence (5′→3′)Primer/ProbeProduct size (bp)
35S promoter35F1CGTTCCAACCACGTCTTCAAforward81
35R1GGATAGTGGGATTGTGCGTCATreverse
35int1CAAGTGGATTGATGTGATATCTCCACTGACGprobe

35F2TGATGTGATATCTCCACTGACGTAAGforward101
35R2GTCCTCTCCAAATGAAATGAACTTCreverse
35int2CACAATCCCACTATCCTTCGCAAGACCprobe

NOS terminatorNOSF1TTACGTTAAGCATGTAATAATTAACAforward81
NOSR1AATTGCGGGACTCTAATCATreverse
NOSint1ATGCATGACGTTATTTATGAGATGGGTprobe

NOSF2TTCTGTTGAATTACGTTAAGCATGTforward101
NOSR2TTAAATGTATAATTGCGGGACTCTAAreverse
NOSint2AATGCATGACGTTATTTATGAGATGGGTTT TTATGprobe

MON810MON810F1CTGACAAGCTGACTCTAGCAGATCTACforward80
MON810R1CACTAGAGAAACGTGACAGTAACAAAGreverse
MON810int1TCTTCGGTACGCGCTCACTTCGprobe

MON810F2ACCCTTCCTCTATATAAGGAAGTTCATTforward94
MON810R2AGTGAGCGCGTACCGAAGAreverse
MON810int2ACACGCTGACAAGCTGACTCTAGCAGATCTACprobe

zSSIIb gene (intrinsic control)SSIIbF1GCTCCATGTGGCGGTACTGforward81
SSIIbR1GACAGGCAGAAGTGCGGTATGreverse
SSIIbint1CTATGGTGATGGCAACTTAGTTTTCATTGCTAATGAprobe

SSIIbF2CTGTTGAGGTTCCATGGTATGCforward101
SSIIbR1GACAGGCAGAAGTGCGGTATGreverse
SSIIbint2TATGGTGATGGCAACTTAGTTTTCATTGCTAATGprobe

Qualitative PCR

To amplify target sequences, newly synthesized primers were diluted to 50 μmol/L for use. For optimization of PCR reaction in a thermal cycler (Biometra T3 thermocycler, Biotron GmbH, Göttingen, Germany), concentrations of MgCl2 and DNA template and the annealing temperature were adjusted. The PCR cycles were as follows: 95°C for 10 min (pre-incubation); 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s (denaturation), 55~60°C for 30 s (annealing), and 72°C for 30 s (extension); 72°C for 7 min (final extension). The PCR products were separated on 2% (w/v) agarose gels and visualized by a UV transilluminator (UVP, Upland, CA, USA) after ethidium bromide (Sigma Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) staining. For sensitivity tests of newly designed primers, the concentration of template DNA ranged from 0.005 to 100 ng.

Construction of a novel reference plasmid

To construct a reference plasmid for RT-PCR, the smaller target regions (80 or 81 bp) of p35S, tNOS, p35S-hsp70 intron, and the intrinsic zSSIIb gene were amplified with the novel primers added with restriction endonuclease sites, i.e. 35F1-HindIII, 35R1-BamHI, NOSF1-BamHI, NOSR1-KpnI, MON810F1-KpnI, MON810R1-ClaI, SSIIbF1-ClaI, and SSIIbR1-EcoRI. The PCR products were digested by the restriction enzymes (Takara Co., Shiga, Japan), purified, and tandem ligated. Finally the ligate was introduced into pUC19 cloning vector digested with EcoRI and HindIII enzymes and transferred to Escherichia coli JM109 strain by an electrotransformation method (15). The transformants were selected on an LB (Luria-Bertani) agar plate (10 g/L of tryptone, 10 g/L of NaCl, 5 g/L of yeast extract, 15 g/L of agar, pH 7.0) supplemented with 100 μg/mL of ampicillin (Sigma Co.). X-gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-beta-D- galactopyranoside) and IPTG (isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside) solutions were also spread on the agar plate for color (blue/white) selection. The recombinant DNA pGMmaize was confirmed by restriction profiles and nucleotide sequencing (data not shown).

Quantitative RT-PCR

Newly synthesized primer and probe sets were tested for RT-PCR. The PCR reactions were performed with a LightCyclerTM system (Roche diagnostics Co., Mannheim, Germany). The TaqMan PCR reaction mixtures contained FastStart PCR master mix (Roche diagnostics Co.), 0.25 μL of primer mix (each 10 μM), 0.5 μL of probe (25 μM), and various concentrations of template DNA. The mixtures were subjected to the following thermal profile: 95°C for 10 min (pre-incubation); 45 to 50 cycles of 95°C for 30 s (denaturation), 57 to 59°C for 1 min (annealing and extension), and 40°C for 30 s (cooling). Standard curves for quantification of transgenic DNA regions were constructed with the reference plasmid pGMmaize which was serially diluted to contain 20, 200, 2,000, 20,000, and 200,000 copies.)

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

To confirm whether the target DNA regions are specifically amplified with novel primer sets designed in this study, qualitative PCRs were performed, resulting in the specific amplifications of the target regions (data not shown). As expected, primer sets targeting the smaller DNA regions were more sensitive than those targeting the larger ones. Particularly in the case of p35S, the primer set for the smaller region (81 bp) was even more sensitive than that for the larger one (101 bp) by 3 log-scales (Fig. 2), which were reflected on real food sample tests. In the tests, 5 of 8 GM-labeled food samples including soup, cracker, frying powder, whole corn, sweet corn, and corn tea were shown to be positive with the primer set for the larger DNA region, whereas seven samples were positive with the primer set for the smaller region; these results indicate the primer sets targeting the smaller DNA regions are more sensitive and powerful for detection of transgenic DNA fragments from GMOs or GM-foods. Additionally, in our model system, GM maize was exposed to high temperature and pressure, resulting in an increase in the rate of DNA degradation (7,16,17); the primer sets for the smaller regions were also more sensitive than those for the larger regions in detection of transgenic regions of the fragmented DNA (unpublished data). These results indicate that the newly designed primer sets for 80 or 81 bp of amplicon could be broadly used for detection of GM maize in highly processed foods.
Fig. 2

Sensitivity of novel primer sets for p35S. The primer set 35F1-R1 was used for the amplification of 81 bp (A) and 35F2-R2 for 101 bp (B). Lane 1, 100 ng; lane 2, 50 ng; lane 3, 5 ng; lane 4, 0.5 ng; lane 5, 0.05 ng; lane 6, 0.005 ng of genomic DNA from MON810 maize line; lane M, size marker (100 bp DNA ladder, NEB Co., Ipswich, MA, USA).

Construction of a reference plasmid pGMmaize

As described in materials and methods, PCR products (80 or 81 bp) amplified by using genomic DNAs of GM maize lines were tandem ligated and cloned into the pUC19 plasmid vector and the resulting recombinant DNA was named pGMmaize. The recombinant DNA was confirmed by restriction with EcoRI and HindIII, which resulted in the liberation of 370 bp of the insert, and the nucleotide sequencing with universal primers for pUC19. The schematic representation of pGMmaize and the nucleotide sequence of the insert are shown in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3

Schematic representation of pGMmaize (A) and the nucleotide sequence of the insert (B). HindIII, BamHI, KpnI, ClaI, and EcoRI indicate restriction endonuclease recognition sites. Each primer and probe region is underlined and named. Arrows indicate the directions of DNA polymerization.

To validate the designed primers and probes targeting the smaller transgenic regions (80 or 81 bp) in RT-PCR, standard curves using 35F1-R1 for p35S, MON810F1-R1 for the MON810 line, and SSIIbF1-R1 for intrinsic zSSIIb gene were constructed with the reference plasmid pGMmaize dilutions, i.e. 20, 200, 2,000, 20,000, and 200,000 copies (Table 2). The slopes, which show direct PCR efficiency, ranged from −3.36 to −3.66 and R2 values for linearity ranged from 0.999 to 1.000, which indicates that the reference plasmid is well-suited for quantitative PCR detection of GM maize lines. The results of RT-PCR using the genomic DNA from the MON810 line as the PCR template could detect 5 pg of the genomic DNA for p35S, MON810 line-specific region, or the zSSIIb gene, which indicate that the developed system using the novel primers and probes targeting the smaller transgenic regions is sensitive and can be effectively applied for quantification of target DNA in highly processed foods.
Table 2

Reliability of copy number of pGMmaize in real-time PCR

Target regionCopy No.

True valueCalculated meanRSD1)
p35S2019.0513.84
200225.123.95
20002449.813.23
200001802824.39
20000020142013.09

p35S-hsp70 (for MON810 line)2022.8311.28
200167.7424.37
20002023.830.65
2000018392.215.87
20000024232021.55

zSSIIb gene (intrinsic control)2020.626.62
200200.5411.73
2000197513.00
200001472610.25
2000002588809.84

RSD: relative standard deviations of reactions, average across five replicates.

At present, many GMOs are cultivated worldwide and the area of cultivation is growing rapidly (2). Therefore GM crops are naturally incorporated into food chains and the labeling system for giving choices to consumers is a way to eradicate their concerns. In the system, a reasonable detection method is a prerequisite and the sensitivity is a key factor to effectively detect transgenic DNA fragments in highly processed foods. For that reason, novel primers and probes targeting transgenic DNA regions such as p35S, tNOS and p35S-hsp70 intron from GM-maize lines were designed in this study (Table 1; Fig. 1). In qualitative tests, primer sets for targeting the smaller regions (80 or 81 bp) were more sensitive than the larger ones (94 or 101 bp). In particular, the p35S primer set for the smaller region (81 bp) was even more sensitive than the larger one (101 bp) by 3 log-scales (Fig. 2). These results were correlated with real food sample tests. The primer set for the smaller region detected 87.5% of GM-labeled food samples (7/8), whereas the primer set for the larger one detected 62.5% of the samples (5/8), indicating the former primer set is more suitable for the detection of transgenic DNA fragments in highly processed food samples where intact DNA molecules are excessively digested during the processes. In quantitative RT-PCR using the primer sets targeting the smaller regions (80 or 81 bp), the detection limit was 5 pg of genomic DNA from the MON810 line for detection of p35S, p35S-hsp70 intron, and zSSIIb gene. Our RT-PCR method is highly sensitive but the developed quantitative method has not yet been applied to real food samples. Therefore, this method should be evaluated for its validity with all types of food samples containing transgenic DNA fragments from GM-Maize lines and compared with other developed quantitative methods in the near future. In conclusion, we know that the use of the novel primer sets targeting the smaller transgenic DNA regions is even better than that for the larger ones in detection of transgenic DNA fragments from GM-maize lines or highly processed GM-foods, even though some practical data should be supported.
  14 in total

Review 1.  Detection of genetically modified organisms in foods.

Authors:  Farid E Ahmed
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 19.536

2.  Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction methods for four genetically modified maize varieties and maize DNA content in food.

Authors:  Peter D Brodmann; Evelyn C Ilg; Hélène Berthoud; Andre Herrmann
Journal:  J AOAC Int       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.913

3.  Interlaboratory transfer of a PCR multiplex method for simultaneous detection of four genetically modified maize lines: Bt11, MON810, T25, and GA21.

Authors:  Marta Hernández; David Rodríguez-Lázaro; David Zhang; Teresa Esteve; Maria Pla; Salomé Prat
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 5.279

4.  Identification and quantification of three genetically modified insect resistant cotton lines using conventional and TaqMan real-time polymerase chain reaction methods.

Authors:  Litao Yang; Aihu Pan; Kewei Zhang; Jinchao Guo; Changsong Yin; Jianxiu Chen; Cheng Huang; Dabing Zhang
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 5.279

5.  Rapid quantification methods for genetically modified maize contents using genomic DNAs pretreated by sonication and restriction endonuclease digestion for a capillary-type real-time PCR system with a plasmid reference standard.

Authors:  Akie Toyota; Hiroshi Akiyama; Mitsunori Sugimura; Takahiro Watanabe; Kozue Sakata; Yuko Shiramasa; Kazumi Kitta; Akihiro Hino; Muneharu Esaka; Tamio Maitani
Journal:  Biosci Biotechnol Biochem       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 2.043

6.  Nanoparticle-based DNA biosensor for visual detection of genetically modified organisms.

Authors:  Despina P Kalogianni; Theodora Koraki; Theodore K Christopoulos; Penelope C Ioannou
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 10.618

7.  First application of a microsphere-based immunoassay to the detection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs): quantification of Cry1Ab protein in genetically modified maize.

Authors:  Anna Fantozzi; Monica Ermolli; Massimiliano Marini; Domenico Scotti; Branko Balla; Maddalena Querci; Stephen R H Langrell; Guy Van den Eede
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 5.279

8.  Detection of recombinant DNA segments introduced to genetically modified maize (Zea mays).

Authors:  Takeshi Matsuoka; Hideo Kuribara; Ken Takubo; Hiroshi Akiyama; Hirohito Miura; Yukihiro Goda; Yuko Kusakabe; Kenji Isshiki; Masatake Toyoda; Akihiro Hino
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2002-03-27       Impact factor: 5.279

9.  Comparative studies of the quantification of genetically modified organisms in foods processed from maize and soy using trial producing.

Authors:  Tomoaki Yoshimura; Hideo Kuribara; Takashi Kodama; Seiko Yamata; Satoshi Futo; Satoshi Watanabe; Nobutaro Aoki; Tayoshi Iizuka; Hiroshi Akiyama; Tamio Maitani; Shigehiro Naito; Akihiro Hino
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 5.279

10.  A novel multiplex quantitative DNA array based PCR (MQDA-PCR) for quantification of transgenic maize in food and feed.

Authors:  Knut Rudi; Ida Rud; Askild Holck
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

1.  Event-specific detection of transgenic potato AV43-6-G7 using real-time and digital PCR methods.

Authors:  Hongwei Gao; Xiaofan Yu; Tingting Deng; Min Sun; Xizhi Xiao; Xin Huang; Ying Chen; Ronggui Li
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 2.563

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.