| Literature DB >> 24471078 |
Abstract
This study was designed to investigate whether the fatty acid composition could make a significant contribution to the oxidation stability of vegetable oils marketed in Korea. Ten kinds, 97 items of vegetable oils that were produced in either an industrialized or a traditional way were collected and analyzed for their fatty acid compositions and lipid oxidation products, in the absence or presence of oxidative stress. Peroxidability index (PI) calculations based on the fatty acid composition ranged from 7.10 to 111.87 with the lowest value found in olive oils and the highest in perilla oils. In the absence of induced oxidative stress, malondialdehyde (MDA), the secondary lipid oxidation product, was generated more in the oils with higher PI (r=0.890), while the tendency was not observed when the oils were subjected to an oxidation-accelerating system. In the presence of the oxidative stress, the perilla oils produced in an industrialized manner generated appreciably higher amounts of MDA than those produced in a traditional way, although both types of oils presented similar PIs. The results implicate that the fatty acid compositions could be a predictor for the oxidation stability of the vegetable oils at the early stage of oil oxidation, but not for those at a later stage of oxidation.Entities:
Keywords: fatty acid composition; malondialdehyde (MDA); oxidation stability; peroxidability index (PI); vegetable oil
Year: 2012 PMID: 24471078 PMCID: PMC3866755 DOI: 10.3746/pnf.2012.17.2.158
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prev Nutr Food Sci ISSN: 2287-1098
Information on the vegetable oils used in this study1)
| Vegetable oils (Abbr., n) | Raw materials | Raw material origin | Bottle materials |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soybean oil (SO, 7) | Soybean 100% | Imported | Polyethylene terephthalate or polyethylene |
| Corn oil (CO, 4) | Germ of corn (maize) 100% | Imported | Polyethylene terephthalate or polyethylene |
| Olive oil (OvO, 16) | Olive 100% | Imported | Polyethylene terephthalate or glass (amber or transparent) bottle |
| Canola oil (CaO, 4) | Canolar (rapeseed) seed 100% | Imported | Polyethylene terephthalate |
| Grapeseed oil (GsO, 11) | Grapeseed 100% | Imported | Polyethylene terephthalate or glass (amber or transparent) bottle |
| Red pepper flavored oil (RpO, 1) | Soybean oil (93%), red pepper powder, red pepper seed | Imported | Glass transparent bottle |
| Hazelnut oil (HO, 1) | Hazelnut 99.9% | Imported | Glass transparent bottle |
| Functional oil (FO, 2) | Esterified canola oil with medium chain fatty acids (MCFA) | Imported | Polyethylene terephthalate |
| Sesame oil (SeO, 26) | |||
| Industrialized ( | Sesame seed 100% | Domestic (n=2)/Imported (n=12) | Glass (amber) bottle |
| Traditional ( | Sesame seed 100% | Domestic (n=3)/Imported (n=9) | Glass (amber) bottle |
| Perilla oil (PO, 25) | |||
| Industrialized ( | Perilla seed 100% | Domestic (n=1)/Imported (n=6) | Glass (amber) bottle |
| Traditional ( | Perilla seed 100% | Domestic (n=9)/Imported (n=9) | Glass (amber) bottle |
Among the various contents written on the ‘product label’ of the vegetable oils, the information that might be related to the lipid oxidation of the oils was extracted and listed. The vegetable oils produced in an industrialized manner were purchased after checking their ‘best by’ dates, thus there were no oil samples whose ‘best by’ dates passed by.
Classified fatty acid compositions, fatty acids-related nutritional index, and peroxidability index (PI) of various vegetable oils1)
| Vegetable oils | SFA | MUFA | PUFA | P/S | PI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SO | 34.64 | 15.84 | 49.52 | 0.42 | 49.10 | 1.43 | 117.84 | 50.33 |
| CO | 23.89 | 31.34 | 44.76 | 0.37 | 44.39 | 1.87 | 119.81 | 45.92 |
| OvO | 21.08 | 73.97 | 4.95 | 0.30 | 4.66 | 0.24 | 15.62 | 7.10 |
| CaO | 18.07 | 61.48 | 20.45 | 0.52 | 19.93 | 1.13 | 38.28 | 22.51 |
| GsO | 20.89 | 22.91 | 56.21 | 0.17 | 56.04 | 2.69 | 326.01 | 56.95 |
| RpO | 23.15 | 28.15 | 48.70 | 0.43 | 48.27 | 2.10 | 113.12 | 49.83 |
| HO | 10.72 | 78.64 | 10.64 | 0.21 | 10.43 | 0.99 | 48.62 | 12.82 |
| FO | 43.41 | 45.76 | 10.84 | 0.37 | 10.47 | 0.25 | 28.12 | 12.35 |
| SeO, industrial | 26.00 | 39.36 | 34.64 | 0.45 | 34.18 | 1.33 | 80.90 | 36.08 |
| SeO, traditional | 27.21 | 37.73 | 35.06 | 0.43 | 34.63 | 1.30 | 87.52 | 36.44 |
| PO, industrial | 16.15 | 22.51 | 61.35 | 49.96 | 11.39 | 3.80 | 0.23 | 111.87 |
| PO, traditional | 16.61 | 21.91 | 61.48 | 49.59 | 11.89 | 3.70 | 0.24 | 111.62 |
Values for SFA, MUFA, PUFA, n-3 PUFA, and n-6 PUFA are average percentages (%) of total fatty acids. The relative standard deviation of each value was less than 10%. P/S and n-6/n-3 are ratios of PUFA to SFA and n-6 to n-3, respectively. PI of the vegetable oils was calculated using the equation described in MATERIALS AND METHODS.
Moisture and lipid oxidation products in various vegetable oils1)
| Vegetable oils | Moisture (%) | Hydroperoxides (μg/g) | MDA (μg/g) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SO | 0.08 ± 0.01a | 341.0 ± 9.3e | 180.7 ± 13.8bc | 4.8 ± 5.5ab |
| CO | 0.04 ± 0.01b | 280.8 ± 6.8ef | 85.5 ± 3.3bcd | 10.0 ± 7.0a |
| OvO | 0.08 ± 0.01a | 618.7 ± 32.5bc | 50.4 ± 2.2cd | 5.8 ± 3.6ab |
| CaO | 0.07 ± 0.01a | 569.9 ± 5.9cd | 187.5 ± 14.3b | 6.8 ± 1.7ab |
| GsO | 0.07 ± 0.01a | 660.9 ± 47.5ab | 62.8 ± 9.7bcd | 5.0 ± 5.1ab |
| RpO | 0.05 ± 0.02b | 598.0 ± 26.3bc | 172.8 ± 13.9bc | 0.4 ± 0.4b |
| HO | 0.03 ± 0.01b | 700.3 ± 17.2a | 36.5 ± 2.4d | 3.2 ± 4.8ab |
| FO | 0.08 ± 0.00a | 249.9 ± 8.9f | 124.0 ± 5.8bcd | 3.6 ± 0.7ab |
| SeO, industrial | 0.05 ± 0.03b | 44.5 ± 49.7h | 56.4 ± 5.2bcd | 1.4 ± 0.3b |
| SeO, traditional | 0.04 ± 0.02b | 6.4 ± 11.7i | 83.0 ± 27.1bc | 1.1 ± 5.0b |
| PO, industrial | 0.05 ± 0.02b | 157.8 ± 55.9g | 1080.3 ± 291.5a | 1.2 ± 4.1b |
| PO, traditional | 0.11 ± 0.18a | 66.6 ± 23.6h | 1087.2 ± 169.2a | 3.8 ± 1.0ab |
|
| ||||
| Significance | p<0.001 | p<0.001 | p<0.001 | NS |
Values with different superscripts in the same column are significantly different. NS means not significant.
The method for MDA determination employed the incubation step of reaction mixtures (sample + chemicals) for 2 hr in a 95°C water bath, thus MDA could be artificially formed from its precursor fatty acids during the analysis.
The value reflects the amount of non-volatile aldehydes, principally 2-alkenals.
Fig. 1MDA contents that were generated from the various vegetable oils with induced oxidative stress. The MDA was monitored as a function of incubation time under an oxidation-accelerating system. Refer to Table 1 for the abbreviations.