PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of biliary MRI, including unenhanced imaging, gadolinium-enhanced (Gd-E) dynamic imaging, and MR cholangiography, for the preoperative staging of gallbladder cancer (GBC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our institutional review board approved this retrospective study. Eighty-six, consecutive patients with surgically resected and pathologically confirmed GBCs and who underwent preoperative MRI, including unenhanced T1- and T2-weighted images, MR cholangiography, and dynamic imaging, were enrolled in this study. Two observers independently evaluated the biliary MR images regarding the T- and N-staging of GBCs and graded their diagnostic confidence for the staging using a 5-point scale. Receiver operating curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MR in the staging of GBC. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using kappa statistics. RESULTS: The overall accuracy of T- and N-staging using biliary MRI was 84.9% and 77.9% for observer 1 and 69.8% and 74.4% for observer 2. There was good interobserver agreement regarding the T stage (k = 0.828). The Az (AUC: area under the curve) values of the diagnostic ability of MRI to differentiate ≥ T1b from ≤ T1a lesions, were 0.979 and 0.955 for both observers (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Biliary MRI with MR cholangiography allows moderately accurate preoperative T staging and N staging of GBCs. It also shows an excellent diagnostic ability for differentiating ≥ T1b lesions from ≤ T1a lesions, which can be helpful for preoperative planning.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of biliary MRI, including unenhanced imaging, gadolinium-enhanced (Gd-E) dynamic imaging, and MR cholangiography, for the preoperative staging of gallbladder cancer (GBC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our institutional review board approved this retrospective study. Eighty-six, consecutive patients with surgically resected and pathologically confirmed GBCs and who underwent preoperative MRI, including unenhanced T1- and T2-weighted images, MR cholangiography, and dynamic imaging, were enrolled in this study. Two observers independently evaluated the biliary MR images regarding the T- and N-staging of GBCs and graded their diagnostic confidence for the staging using a 5-point scale. Receiver operating curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MR in the staging of GBC. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using kappa statistics. RESULTS: The overall accuracy of T- and N-staging using biliary MRI was 84.9% and 77.9% for observer 1 and 69.8% and 74.4% for observer 2. There was good interobserver agreement regarding the T stage (k = 0.828). The Az (AUC: area under the curve) values of the diagnostic ability of MRI to differentiate ≥ T1b from ≤ T1a lesions, were 0.979 and 0.955 for both observers (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Biliary MRI with MR cholangiography allows moderately accurate preoperative T staging and N staging of GBCs. It also shows an excellent diagnostic ability for differentiating ≥ T1b lesions from ≤ T1a lesions, which can be helpful for preoperative planning.
Authors: Kui Sun Choi; Sae Byeol Choi; Pyoungjae Park; Wan Bae Kim; Sang Yong Choi Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Andrea Agostini; Moritz F Kircher; Richard K G Do; Alessandra Borgheresi; Serena Monti; Andrea Giovagnoni; Lorenzo Mannelli Journal: Semin Roentgenol Date: 2016-05-30 Impact factor: 0.800
Authors: Ji Hoon Park; Young Hoon Kim; Haeryoung Kim; Yoo-Seok Yoon; Young Rok Choi; Jai Young Cho; Yoon Jin Lee; Ho-Seong Han Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-12-29 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Ramazan Kozan; Safa Özaydın; Hüseyin Bayhan; Sezai Leventoğlu; Ahmet Karamercan; Ahmet Ziya Anadol; Mustafa Şare; Abdülkadir Bülent Aytaç Journal: Turk J Gastroenterol Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 1.852
Authors: Pablo Letelier; Ismael Riquelme; Alfonso H Hernández; Neftalí Guzmán; Jorge G Farías; Juan Carlos Roa Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 5.923