Literature DB >> 24470336

Do preprocessing algorithms and statistical models influence voxel-based morphometry (VBM) results in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients? A systematic comparison of popular VBM analytical methods.

Venkateswaran Rajagopalan1, Guang H Yue, Erik P Pioro.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study whether inconsistent findings in voxel-based morphometry (VBM) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) brain are due to use of different data preprocessing and statistical methods in two software packages.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained during routine clinical imaging at 1.5T in ALS patients with frontotemporal dementia (ALS-FTD) (n=18) and in unaffected neurologic controls (n=15). Gray matter (GM) VBM analysis was carried out using FMRIB software library (FSL) 4.1.5 and statistical parametric mapping 8 (SPM8). Comparison of processing steps segmentation, registration, and statistical methods (nonparametric vs. parametric) between the two softwares was performed by subjecting the same dataset through standard VBM processing pipelines.
RESULTS: GM volume was significantly (P<0.05) reduced in motor and extramotor regions of ALS-FTD when compared to controls. Percentage of atrophied GM voxels in the entire brain that reached statistical significance using FSL was 22.52% compared to 0.81% in SPM. Similarly, 0.81% (3308 voxels) reached statistical significance using nonparametric statistics when compared to parametric statistics (0.50%, 2056 voxels).
CONCLUSION: The differences in GM volume atrophy measures found by FSL and SPM analytic methods indicate that variable results in previous VBM studies may arise from differences in their image processing algorithms and statistical models.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALS patients; FSL; SPM; voxel based morphometry

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24470336     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  11 in total

1.  Widespread Focal Cortical Alterations in Autism Spectrum Disorder with Intellectual Disability Detected by Threshold-Free Cluster Enhancement.

Authors:  V E Contarino; S Bulgheroni; S Annunziata; A Erbetta; D Riva
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Brain Anatomy in Latino Farmworkers Exposed to Pesticides and Nicotine.

Authors:  Paul J Laurienti; Jonathan H Burdette; Jennifer Talton; Carey N Pope; Phillip Summers; Francis O Walker; Sara A Quandt; Robert G Lyday; Haiying Chen; Timothy D Howard; Thomas A Arcury
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.162

Review 3.  Neuroimaging as a New Diagnostic Modality in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Esther Verstraete; Bradley R Foerster
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Structural explanation of poor prognosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the non-demented state.

Authors:  H-J Kim; S-I Oh; M de Leon; X Wang; K-W Oh; J-S Park; A Deshpande; M Buj; S H Kim
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 6.089

5.  Failed replications, contributing factors and careful interpretations: Commentary on Boekel et al., 2015.

Authors:  Nils Muhlert; Gerard R Ridgway
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 6.  What does imaging reveal about the pathology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis?

Authors:  Martin R Turner; Esther Verstraete
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.081

7.  Disparate voxel based morphometry (VBM) results between SPM and FSL softwares in ALS patients with frontotemporal dementia: which VBM results to consider?

Authors:  Venkateswaran Rajagopalan; Erik P Pioro
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 2.474

8.  Structural and diffusion imaging versus clinical assessment to monitor amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Arturo Cardenas-Blanco; Judith Machts; Julio Acosta-Cabronero; Joern Kaufmann; Susanne Abdulla; Katja Kollewe; Susanne Petri; Stefanie Schreiber; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Reinhard Dengler; Stefan Vielhaber; Peter J Nestor
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.881

9.  Inter-Method Discrepancies in Brain Volume Estimation May Drive Inconsistent Findings in Autism.

Authors:  Gajendra J Katuwal; Stefi A Baum; Nathan D Cahill; Chase C Dougherty; Eli Evans; David W Evans; Gregory J Moore; Andrew M Michael
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Localizing Age-Related Changes in Brain Structure Using Voxel-Based Morphometry.

Authors:  Shu Hua Mu; Min Xu; Jun Xiu Duan; Jian Zhang; Li Hai Tan
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.