Literature DB >> 24470062

Feasibility of single-port laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancers and preoperative assessment of operative difficulty.

Atsushi Hamabe1, Ichiro Takemasa, Mamoru Uemura, Junichi Nishimura, Tsunekazu Mizushima, Masataka Ikeda, Hirofumi Yamamoto, Mitsugu Sekimoto, Yuichiro Doki, Masaki Mori.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Single-port laparoscopic surgery is more difficult for sigmoid colon and rectal cancers than for right-sided colon cancer. We sought to analyze the feasibility of this procedure for sigmoid colon and rectal cancers and to estimate its difficulty.
METHODS: We analyzed prospectively collected data from 63 consecutive patients with sigmoid colon or rectal cancers who underwent single-port laparoscopic surgery at our institution from June 2009 to December 2011. Patient and tumor characteristics, including patients' pelvic anatomy which was assessed on CT scan imaging, were evaluated to elucidate what factors would affect the difficulty of the procedure and the necessity of using an additional trocar.
RESULTS: Overall, the median operative duration was 190 min and blood loss was 20 ml, with no postoperative complications. The median number of lymph nodes harvested was 17 and the distal margin was 58 mm. The tumor was located significantly closer to the anus in cases in which an additional trocar was required in the right lower quadrant (9.5 vs 18 cm, p < 0.0001). Procedural difficulty was significantly increased in cases in which the sacral promontory protruded ventrally (odds ratio 0.779 [95% confidence interval 0.613 to 0.945], p = 0.0236).
CONCLUSIONS: Depending on tumor location and sacral promontory shape, the introduction of an additional trocar might render single-port laparoscopic surgery feasible for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24470062     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-014-2463-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  32 in total

1.  Randomized clinical trial of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term operative outcomes.

Authors:  Zhan Guo Cao; Wang Cai; Ming Fang Qin; Hong Zhi Zhao; Ping Yue; Yang Li
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.719

2.  Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: experience with 17 consecutive cases and comparison with multiport laparoscopic right colectomy.

Authors:  James Adair; Mark A Gromski; Robert B Lim; Deborah Nagle
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Single-incision versus hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a case-matched series.

Authors:  Dhruvil P Gandhi; Madhu Ragupathi; Chirag B Patel; Diego I Ramos-Valadez; T Bartley Pickron; Eric M Haas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Video. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon cancer.

Authors:  Ichiro Takemasa; Mitsugu Sekimoto; Masataka Ikeda; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Hirofumi Yamamoto; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Results of a multicenter study of 1,057 cases of rectal cancer treated by laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Nobuyoshi Miyajima; Masaki Fukunaga; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Jun-ichi Tanaka; Junji Okuda; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Eric C H Lai; George P C Yang; Chung Ngai Tang; Patricia C L Yih; Oliver C Y Chan; Michael K W Li
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Impact of single-port cholecystectomy on postoperative pain.

Authors:  M Asakuma; M Hayashi; K Komeda; T Shimizu; F Hirokawa; Y Miyamoto; J Okuda; N Tanigawa
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  MRI assessment of the bony pelvis may help predict resectability of rectal cancer.

Authors:  K M Boyle; D Petty; A G Chalmers; P Quirke; A Cairns; P J Finan; P M Sagar; D Burke
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.

Authors:  Pascal Bucher; François Pugin; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?

Authors:  R J Heald; E M Husband; R D Ryall
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  12 in total

1.  Assessment of treatment options for rectosigmoid cancer: single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery, single-incision laparoscopic surgery, and conventional laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Ruoyan Liu; Yanan Wang; Ze Zhang; Tingting Li; Hao Liu; Liying Zhao; Haijun Deng; Guoxin Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Safety and Feasibility of Umbilical Diverting Loop Ileostomy for Patients with Rectal Tumor.

Authors:  Masaaki Miyo; Ichiro Takemasa; Taishi Hata; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Transanal total mesorectal excision assisted by single-port laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  W-H Chen; L Kang; S-L Luo; X-W Zhang; Y Huang; Z-H Liu; J-P Wang
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Patient Body Image and Satisfaction with Surgical Wound Appearance After Reduced Port Surgery for Colorectal Diseases.

Authors:  Atsushi Hamabe; Ichiro Takemasa; Taishi Hata; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Long-term outcomes of single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: results of a propensity score-based analysis.

Authors:  Yozo Suzuki; Mitsuyoshi Tei; Masaki Wakasugi; Yujiro Nakahara; Atsushi Naito; Manabu Mikamori; Kenta Furukawa; Masahisa Ohtsuka; Jeong Ho Moon; Mitsunobu Imasato; Tadafumi Asaoka; Kentaro Kishi; Hiroki Akamatsu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A safety study of transumbilical single incision versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yanan Wang; Ruoyan Liu; Ze Zhang; Qi Xue; Jun Yan; Jiang Yu; Hao Liu; Liying Zhao; Tingyu Mou; Haijun Deng; Guoxin Li
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Use of a multi-instrument access device in abdominoperineal resections.

Authors:  Yoen Tk van der Linden; Doeke Boersma; Koop Bosscha; Daniel J Lips; Hubert A Prins
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.407

8.  Factors Influencing Difficulty of Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection for Ultra-Low Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Qiken Li; Dechuan Li; Lai Jiang; Pengnian Qiu; Zhixuan Fu; Lilong Tang; Weiping Chen
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.719

9.  Single-site laparoscopic colectomy for rectosigmoid cancer with middle aortic syndrome: report of a case.

Authors:  Koki Tamai; Ichiro Takemasa; Mamoru Uemura; Junichi Nishimura; Taishi Hata; Hiroki Higashihara; Keigo Osuga; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Hirofumi Yamamoto; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-06-19

10.  Factors Predicting Difficulty of Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer with Total Mesorectal Excision and Double Stapling Technique.

Authors:  Weiping Chen; Qiken Li; Yongtian Fan; Dechuan Li; Lai Jiang; Pengnian Qiu; Lilong Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.