BACKGROUND: Patients who undergo major surgery are at risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality. It would be appropriate to initiate advance care planning with patients prior to surgery, but surgeons may experience difficulty initiating such conversations. Rather than focus on changing clinician behavior, advance care planning decision aids can be an innovative vehicle to motivate advance care planning among surgical patients and their families. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper is to describe a study protocol for conducting an environmental scan concerning advance care planning decision aids that may be relevant to patients undergoing high-risk surgery. METHODS/ DESIGN: This study will gather information from written or verbal data sources that incorporate professional and lay perspectives: a systematic review, a grey literature review, key informant interviews, and patient and family engagement. It is envisioned that this study will generate three outcomes: a synthesis of current evidence, a summary of gaps in knowledge, and a taxonomy of existing advance care planning decision aids. DISCUSSION: This environmental scan will demonstrate principles of patient-centered outcomes research, and it will exemplify a pioneering approach for reviewing complex interventions. Anticipated limitations are that information will be gathered from a small sample of patients and families, and that potentially relevant information could also be missing from the environmental scan due to the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Outcomes from the environmental scan will inform future patient-centered research to develop and evaluate a new decision aid.
BACKGROUND:Patients who undergo major surgery are at risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality. It would be appropriate to initiate advance care planning with patients prior to surgery, but surgeons may experience difficulty initiating such conversations. Rather than focus on changing clinician behavior, advance care planning decision aids can be an innovative vehicle to motivate advance care planning among surgical patients and their families. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper is to describe a study protocol for conducting an environmental scan concerning advance care planning decision aids that may be relevant to patients undergoing high-risk surgery. METHODS/ DESIGN: This study will gather information from written or verbal data sources that incorporate professional and lay perspectives: a systematic review, a grey literature review, key informant interviews, and patient and family engagement. It is envisioned that this study will generate three outcomes: a synthesis of current evidence, a summary of gaps in knowledge, and a taxonomy of existing advance care planning decision aids. DISCUSSION: This environmental scan will demonstrate principles of patient-centered outcomes research, and it will exemplify a pioneering approach for reviewing complex interventions. Anticipated limitations are that information will be gathered from a small sample of patients and families, and that potentially relevant information could also be missing from the environmental scan due to the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Outcomes from the environmental scan will inform future patient-centered research to develop and evaluate a new decision aid.
Authors: P A Lipsett; S M Swoboda; J Dickerson; M Ylitalo; T Gordon; M Breslow; K Campbell; T Dorman; P Pronovost; B Rosenfeld Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Deborah Marshall; John F P Bridges; Brett Hauber; Ruthanne Cameron; Lauren Donnalley; Ken Fyie; F Reed Johnson Journal: Patient Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 3.883
Authors: Angelo E Volandes; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; E Francis Cook; Shimon Shaykevich; Elmer D Abbo; Muriel R Gillick Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-04-23
Authors: Rebecca A Aslakson; Shivani V Chandrashekaran; Elizabeth Rickerson; Bridget N Fahy; Fabian M Johnston; Judith A Miller; Alison Conca-Cheng; Suwei Wang; Arden M Morris; Karl Lorenz; Jennifer S Temel; Thomas J Smith Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Rebecca A Aslakson; Sarina R Isenberg; Norah L Crossnohere; Alison M Conca-Cheng; Ting Yang; Matthew Weiss; Angelo E Volandes; John F P Bridges; Debra L Roter Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: John F P Bridges; Thomas Lynch; Anne L R Schuster; Norah L Crossnohere; Katherine Clegg Smith; Rebecca A Aslakson Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: John Fp Bridges; Norah L Crossnohere; Anne L Schuster; Judith A Miller; Carolyn Pastorini; Rebecca A Aslakson Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 2.711
Authors: Patricia Charlton; Shelley Doucet; Rima Azar; Daniel A Nagel; Leah Boulos; Alison Luke; Kim Mears; Katherine J Kelly; William J Montelpare Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-09-06 Impact factor: 2.692