Maria Friedrichsen1, Ann Lindholm2, Anna Milberg3. 1. Palliative Education and Research Center, The County of Östergötland, Vrinnevi Hospital, Norrköping, Sweden. 2. Research and Development Department, Stockholms Sjukhem Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden. 3. Department of Social & Welfare Studies, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the experiences and preferences of terminally ill cancer patients regarding truth telling in the communication of poor prognoses. METHOD: We recorded and transcribed interviews with 45 patients who knew their cancer was terminal, and analyzed their responses hermeneutically. RESULTS: Patients identified three different modes of truth: (1) the absolute objective truth that they are dying; (2) the partial truth about their condition including some facts but not all of the details; and (3) the desired truth, originating in the patient's own beliefs about a healthy or better life. Coping strategies were related to patients' preferred mode of truth: (1) facing the truth in order to take action; (2) facing some parts of the truth in order to maintain hope; and (3) hovering between facing and avoiding the truth. In their struggle for existential survival, patients used different coping strategies, changing from one to another depending upon the circumstances. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Varying use of different coping strategies impacts on patient preferences concerning communication about bad news with their doctors. Truth-telling entails more than merely providing information related to the forthcoming death. It also concerns how physicians or other healthcare staff can support the patient's existential survival by fine-tuning the communication of "truth" according to the individuals' preferences.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the experiences and preferences of terminally ill cancerpatients regarding truth telling in the communication of poor prognoses. METHOD: We recorded and transcribed interviews with 45 patients who knew their cancer was terminal, and analyzed their responses hermeneutically. RESULTS:Patients identified three different modes of truth: (1) the absolute objective truth that they are dying; (2) the partial truth about their condition including some facts but not all of the details; and (3) the desired truth, originating in the patient's own beliefs about a healthy or better life. Coping strategies were related to patients' preferred mode of truth: (1) facing the truth in order to take action; (2) facing some parts of the truth in order to maintain hope; and (3) hovering between facing and avoiding the truth. In their struggle for existential survival, patients used different coping strategies, changing from one to another depending upon the circumstances. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Varying use of different coping strategies impacts on patient preferences concerning communication about bad news with their doctors. Truth-telling entails more than merely providing information related to the forthcoming death. It also concerns how physicians or other healthcare staff can support the patient's existential survival by fine-tuning the communication of "truth" according to the individuals' preferences.
Authors: Elise C Tarbi; Robert Gramling; Christine Bradway; Elizabeth G Broden; Salimah H Meghani Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2021-02-02 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Remko M van Eenennaam; Willeke J Kruithof; Michael A van Es; Esther T Kruitwagen-van Reenen; Henk-Jan Westeneng; Johanna M A Visser-Meily; Leonard H van den Berg; Anita Beelen Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2020-12-14 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Lisa Hjelmfors; Martje H L van der Wal; Maria Friedrichsen; Anna Milberg; Jan Mårtensson; Anna Sandgren; Anna Strömberg; Tiny Jaarsma Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Annika Malmström; Lisa Åkesson; Peter Milos; Munila Mudaisi; Helena Bruhn; Michael Strandeus; Marit Karlsson Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-10-30 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Remko M van Eenennaam; Loulou S Koppenol; Willeke J Kruithof; Esther T Kruitwagen-van Reenen; Sotice Pieters; Michael A van Es; Leonard H van den Berg; Johanna M A Visser-Meily; Anita Beelen Journal: Brain Sci Date: 2021-11-30