Literature DB >> 2446847

Spatial resolution of neuromagnetic records: theoretical calculations in a spherical model.

R Hari1, S L Joutsiniemi, J Sarvas.   

Abstract

Spatial resolution of magnetoencephalography (MEG) was studied by computer simulations using a spherical conductor model for the head. The accuracy obtainable in the absolute location of a dipole was found by calculating the confidence limits for source location in 3 dimensions. The accuracy in determining the relative locations of two sources was estimated by calculating the smallest shift in source location that could be detected with statistical significance. The results were used to illustrate the dependence of spatial resolution on several factors including noise, source depth, source strength, flux transformer configuration and the choice of the measurement locations. Under optimal conditions, separations of a couple of millimeters in superficial non-simultaneous sources can be detected, whereas for deeper sources the resolution is worse.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2446847     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(88)90020-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  27 in total

1.  Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.

Authors:  Arthur K Liu; Anders M Dale; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Frequency change detection in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  P May; H Tiitinen; R J Ilmoniemi; G Nyman; J G Taylor; R Näätänen
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Pattern recognition in biomagnetic signals by spatio-temporal correlation and application to the localisation of propagating neuronal activity.

Authors:  K Abraham-Fuchs; W Härer; S Schneider; H Stefan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Improved accuracy of MEG localization in the temporal region with inclusion of volume current effects.

Authors:  D F Rose; E Ducla-Soares; S Sato
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 5.  EEG versus MEG localization accuracy: theory and experiment.

Authors:  D Cohen; B N Cuffin
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Quantitative representation of the upper surface of the human head.

Authors:  S K Law; P L Nunez
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 7.  Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback.

Authors:  Ranganatha Sitaram; Tomas Ros; Luke Stoeckel; Sven Haller; Frank Scharnowski; Jarrod Lewis-Peacock; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Maria Laura Blefari; Mohit Rana; Ethan Oblak; Niels Birbaumer; James Sulzer
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 8.  Neuromagnetic functional localization: principles, state of the art, and perspectives.

Authors:  G L Romani; P Rossini
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Somatosensory mechanical response and digit somatotopy within cortical areas of the postcentral gyrus in humans: an MEG study.

Authors:  Ken Inoue; Kazuyoshi Nakanishi; Hikmat Hadoush; Hiroshi Kurumadani; Akira Hashizume; Toru Sunagawa; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 10.  IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG).

Authors:  Riitta Hari; Sylvain Baillet; Gareth Barnes; Richard Burgess; Nina Forss; Joachim Gross; Matti Hämäläinen; Ole Jensen; Ryusuke Kakigi; François Mauguière; Nobukatzu Nakasato; Aina Puce; Gian-Luca Romani; Alfons Schnitzler; Samu Taulu
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.