Literature DB >> 24468417

Comparison of the prevalence, clinical features, and long-term outcomes of midventricular hypertrophy vs apical phenotype in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Chi Cai1, Fu-jian Duan2, Yin-jian Yang1, Xi-ying Guo1, Yan-ling Liu2, Yu-qing Liu1, Li-rong Yan1, Zhi-min Xu1, Shi-hua Zhao3, Wei Hua4, Yi-shi Li1, Chao-mei Fan5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies on the association between the distribution of left ventricle hypertrophy and the clinical features of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) have yielded unclear results. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in the prevalence, clinical features, management strategies, and long-term outcomes between patients with midventricular hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (MVHOCM) and patients with apical HCM (ApHCM).
METHODS: A retrospective study of 60 patients with MVHOCM and 263 patients with ApHCM identified in a consecutive single-centre cohort consisting of 2068 patients with HCM was performed. The prevalence, clinical features, and natural history of the patients in these 2 groups were compared.
RESULTS: Compared with ApHCM patients, patients with MVHOCM tended to be much younger and more symptomatic during their initial evaluation. Over a mean follow-up of 7 years, the probability of cardiovascular mortality and that of morbidity was significantly greater in MVHOCM patients compared with ApHCM patients (log-rank, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that, compared with ApHCM, MVHOCM represents an uncommon presentation of the clinical spectrum of HCM that is characterized by progressive clinical deterioration leading to increased cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Our results also underscore the importance of the timely recognition of MVHOCM for the prediction of prognosis and the early consideration of appropriate management strategies.
Copyright © 2014 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24468417     DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  5 in total

Review 1.  Mid-ventricular obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with apical aneurysm: An important subtype of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Li Cui; Gary Tse; Zhiqiang Zhao; George Bazoukis; Konstantinos P Letsas; Panagiotis Korantzopoulos; Leonardo Roever; Guangping Li; Tong Liu
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of End-stage Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Yan Xiao; Kun-Qi Yang; Yan-Kun Yang; Ya-Xin Liu; Tao Tian; Lei Song; Xiong-Jing Jiang; Xian-Liang Zhou
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  The clinical features, outcomes and genetic characteristics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with severe right ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  Xiying Guo; Chaomei Fan; Lei Tian; Yanling Liu; Hongyue Wang; Shihua Zhao; Fujian Duan; Xiuling Zhang; Xing Zhao; Fengqi Wang; Hongguang Zhu; Aiqing Lin; Xia Wu; Yishi Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  An Atypical Case of Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Absence of Giant T Waves in spite of Extreme Apical Wall Hypertrophy.

Authors:  Elias Sanidas; Maria Bonou; Georgios Anastasiadis; Georgios Tzanis; John Barbetseas
Journal:  Case Rep Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-08

5.  Mid-ventricular obstruction is associated with non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Changrong Nie; Changsheng Zhu; Minghu Xiao; Qiulan Yang; Yanhai Meng; Rong Wu; Shuiyun Wang
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.882

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.