Literature DB >> 2446840

The utility of visual evoked potentials using hemifield stimulation and several check sizes in the evaluation of suspected multiple sclerosis.

G P Novak1, M Wiznitzer, D Kurtzberg, B S Giesser, H G Vaughan.   

Abstract

One hundred and eleven patients with suspected multiple sclerosis (64 possible, 47 probable) and 16 with a definite diagnosis of MS were evaluated with pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials (VEPs), employing monocular full-field checks subtending 7', 14' and 28' of visual angle, and right and left hemifield 28' checks. Thirty-seven patients (29%) had a completely normal study. Sixty-six patients (52%) had abnormal responses to full-field 28' checks, and in 13 (10%) of these, additional abnormalities were found in one or more of the other test conditions, which indicated the presence of an additional site of dysfunction in the visual pathway. Twenty-four patients (19%) with 'normal' full-field 28' responses had abnormalities in one or more of the other test conditions; these included prolonged latency to small size (7' and 14') full-field checks, abnormal responses in homonymous hemifields, and abnormal responses limited to a hemifield of one eye. Thus, the use of several check sizes and hemifield stimulation not only increases the sensitivity of VEPs in the evaluation of patients with suspected demyelinating disease, but enhances the capability of the VEP to demonstrate more than one area of visual system impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2446840     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(88)90013-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  7 in total

1.  The topographic distribution of the magnetic P100M to full- and half-field stimulation.

Authors:  G Harding; B Janday; R Armstrong
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Topographic mapping and source localization of the pattern reversal visual evoked magnetic response.

Authors:  G F Harding; B Janday; R A Armstrong
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Are VEP abnormalities in optic neuritis (ON) dependent on plaque size? A reappraisal of the physiopathology of ON based on improved MRI and multiple-lead recordings.

Authors:  T Fulgente; A Thomas; L Lobefalo; L Mastropasqua; P E Gallenga; D Gambi; M Onofrj
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1996-02

4.  Source model and scalp topography of pattern reversal visual evoked potentials to altitudinal stimuli suggest that infoldings of calcarine fissure are not part of VEP generators.

Authors:  M Onofrj; T Fulgente; A Thomas; G Malatesta; M Peresson; T Locatelli; V Martinelli; G Comi
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Topographic mapping and source localization of the pattern onset visual evoked magnetic response.

Authors:  C Degg; A Slaven; R A Armstrong
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Functional and Morphological Changes in the Visual Pathway in Patients with Graves' Orbitopathy.

Authors:  Agnieszka Jagiełło-Korzeniowska; Agata Bałdys-Waligórska; Alicja Hubalewska-Dydejczyk; Bożena Romanowska-Dixon
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 7.  Clinical electrophysiology of the optic nerve and retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Oliver R Marmoy; Suresh Viswanathan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.775

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.