| Literature DB >> 24467943 |
Gary Remington1, Gagan Fervaha2, George Foussias3, Ofer Agid3, Peter Turrone2.
Abstract
In the field of schizophrenia research, as in other areas of psychiatry, there is a sense of frustration that greater advances have not been made over the years, calling into question existing research strategies. Arguably, many purported gains claimed by research have been "lost in translation," resulting in limited impact on diagnosis and treatment in the clinical setting. There are exceptions; for example, we would argue that different lines of preclinical and clinical research have substantially altered how we look at antipsychotic dosing. While this story remains a work in progress, advances "found in translation" have played an important role. Detailing these changes, the present paper speaks to a body of evidence that has already shifted clinical practice and raises questions that may further alter the manner in which antipsychotics have been administered over the last 6 decades.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24467943 PMCID: PMC4074233 DOI: 10.1503/jpn.130191
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci ISSN: 1180-4882 Impact factor: 6.186