Literature DB >> 24467326

Vaginal microbiota of spayed dogs with or without recurrent urinary tract infections.

R G Hutchins1, S L Vaden, M E Jacob, T L Harris, K D Bowles, M W Wood, C S Bailey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available regarding the vaginal microbiota of normal spayed dogs and spayed dogs with recurrent UTIs. Vaginal lactic acid-producing bacteria (LAB) have been associated with decreased frequency of recurrent urinary tract infection in women and may have a protective role within the urinary tract of female dogs. HYPOTHESIS/
OBJECTIVES: Spayed dogs with historical recurrent UTI will have decreased prevalence of LAB and increased prevalence of uropathogenic bacterial populations in the vaginal microbiota when compared with the vaginal microbiota of healthy, spayed dogs. ANIMALS: Twenty-one client-owned adult spayed female dogs with historical recurrent UTI and 23 healthy, spayed female dogs without a history of recurrent UTI.
METHODS: Dogs were placed into a recurrent UTI group or control group in this prospective study. Bacterial populations were isolated and characterized from vaginal swabs obtained from each dog.
RESULTS: The most common bacterial isolates obtained from the vaginal tract of all dogs were Escherichia coli (11/44) and S. pseudintermedius (13/44). E. coli was isolated from the vaginal tract of 8 of 21 (38%) dogs in the rUTI group and 3 of 23 (13%) dogs in the control group (P = .08). LAB were isolated from 7 of the 44 dogs. Two of these 7 dogs were in the rUTI group and 5 of the 7 dogs were in the control group. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The vaginal microbiota of spayed female dogs with recurrent UTI was similar to the control population of normal, spayed female dogs.
Copyright © 2014 by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lactic acid-producing bacteria; Recurrent urinary tract infection

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24467326      PMCID: PMC4858014          DOI: 10.1111/jvim.12299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Intern Med        ISSN: 0891-6640            Impact factor:   3.333


Columbia blood agar lactic acid‐producing bacteria MacConkey agar de Man Rogosa Sharpe urinary tract infection Recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI) are a substantial source of morbidity in affected dogs and a major source of frustration and cost to owners. Although most UTIs in dogs occur as single episodes, recurrent UTIs affect approximately 3 of every 1,000 canine veterinary patients.1, 2, 3 Often the development of recurrent infections can be linked to alterations in urine characteristics or abnormalities of urogenital anatomy, but in approximately 29% of the patient population an inciting cause is never identified, leading to repeated infections.4, 5 Recently, an association between altered vaginal microbiota and development of recurrent UTI has been identified in women.6, 7 Women with recurrent UTIs are more likely to have vaginal microbiota predominated by uropathogenic bacterial populations, including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Proteus species, in conjunction with depletion of the normally predominant Lactobacillus species, especially at the time of UTI recurrence.8, 9, 10 It is hypothesized that lactic acid‐producing bacteria (LAB), including Lactobacillus and Enterococcus species, are essential in maintenance of urogenital health because these bacteria inhibit other microbial growth by a variety of mechanisms.8 Information regarding the vaginal microbiota of spayed dogs is limited and there are no published studies describing the vaginal microbiota of dogs prone to recurrent UTI. In 1 study that did quantify vaginal LAB in healthy and clinically ill dogs, LAB were detected in 41 of 42 samples.11 These bacterial strains demonstrated inhibition of growth against common canine uropathogenic bacteria, suggesting that vaginal LAB also may have a protective role in the urinary tract of female dogs.11 The purpose of this study was to characterize the vaginal microbiota of spayed dogs with recurrent UTI and to compare the vaginal microbiota of these dogs with the vaginal microbiota of healthy, spayed dogs with no history of recurrent UTI. We hypothesized that spayed dogs with historical recurrent UTI would have a decreased prevalence of LAB and an increased prevalence of uropathogenic bacterial vaginal populations when compared to the vaginal microbiota of healthy, spayed dogs. Confirmation of this hypothesis would identify a new risk factor for recurrent UTI that may be targeted medically.

Materials and Methods

Case Selection Criteria

Twenty‐three client‐owned spayed female dogs >6 months of age admitted to the North Carolina State University Veterinary Health Complex with a history of recurrent UTI were recruited for inclusion in this prospective study. Twenty‐three spayed female dogs >6 months of age without a history of recurrent UTI were recruited from employees and students at the North Carolina State University Veterinary Health Complex for inclusion in the control group. Recurrent UTI was defined as >2 episodes of UTI in a 6‐month period or >3 episodes of UTI in a 1‐year period. Dogs were excluded from the study if they currently were receiving antibiotics, probiotic supplements, or cranberry supplements, or had received any of these within 2 weeks of enrollment. The study protocol was evaluated and approved by the North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), and owners of all dogs signed an informed consent form before enrollment of their pet in the study.

Recurrent UTI Patient Medical History Review

The medical record of each dog with recurrent UTI included in this study was retrospectively reviewed. Pertinent information regarding patient signalment, frequency of documented UTI, the causative organisms isolated, abnormal urogenital physical examination findings, and conditions identified that are recognized risk factors for recurrent UTIs were extracted and summarized. Urine culture results available from rUTI dogs within 1 week of obtaining vaginal samples were compared to vaginal flora. Urine samples for culture were not obtained from the control group.

Sample Collection

A vaginal sample was obtained from the cranial aspect of the vagina of each dog. Samples were collected with a sterile, double‐guarded culturette1 (Fig 1) to minimize contamination from other areas of the genitourinary tract. The outer guard of the vaginal swab was positioned beyond the urethral orifice and anterior to the vestibulovaginal junction in the vaginal vault. The inner guard and culturette were advanced through the sealed outer guard. The sterile swab was advanced beyond the inner guard as far cranially as possible with gentle pressure and rotated several times. Both the inner guard and swab were retrieved while the outer guard was held in place. The entire culturette was removed, with the sterile swab contained within the inner and outer guard, eliminating exposure to other areas of the genitourinary tract.12
Figure 1

Picture of a canine sterile, double‐guarded culturette used in this study to obtain vaginal samples from the cranial vaginal vault. A. Outer guard; B. sterile swab; C. sterile inner guard.

Picture of a canine sterile, double‐guarded culturette used in this study to obtain vaginal samples from the cranial vaginal vault. A. Outer guard; B. sterile swab; C. sterile inner guard.

Identification of Vaginal Bacterial Populations

The isolation of vaginal bacteria was conducted at the North Carolina State University Clinical Microbiology Laboratory. Vaginal swabs were plated onto Columbia blood agar (CBA) and MacConkey agar (MAC) plates2 for the isolation of aerobic bacteria. Plates were incubated for a minimum of 48 hours at 35°C under 5% CO2. A pure culture of each isolate was obtained and identified biochemically using commercially available panels,3, 4 for gram positive and negative organisms. Swabs also were inoculated onto 2 Rogosa agar plates.2 These plates were incubated for a minimum of 48 hours at 35°C under both microaerophilic and anaerobic conditions for the isolation of LAB. Any morphologically distinct colony was isolated and gram stained; gram‐positive organisms were saved as presumptive LAB. Finally, swabs were enriched in thioglycollate broth2 and incubated at 35°C. If no colonies were obtained on the original CBA, MAC, or Rogosa plates after 48 hours, the enrichment was inoculated onto all 3 agar plates and again incubated for a minimum of 48 hours at 35°C. Plates were evaluated as described above. All isolates were frozen in glycerol at −80°C for further analysis. After completion of sample collection, all frozen presumptive LAB isolates (gram‐positive rods obtained on Rogosa agar) were submitted for 16s rDNA sequencing at the National Veterinary Services Laboratory.5

Statistical Analysis

A priori statistics were performed using the program G‐Power 3.1.13, 14 For the purposes of this statistical analysis, a difference of 25% in the incidence of a bacterium was assumed to have clinical relevance. Using a previously published incidence of Lactobacillus spp. as a baseline (59%),11 a priori statistics with α = 0.05 and power = 0.95 indicated the need for 42 animals (21/group). The number of organisms isolated from vaginal samples was compared between groups using a Wilcoxon Rank Sum test because of a non‐normal distribution pattern. The prevalence of specific organisms was compared between groups using Fisher's Exact test.

Results

Dogs

A total of 46 dogs were evaluated for entry in this study. Two dogs were excluded after enrollment because further review of the dogs' medical records identified an inadequate frequency of UTI in the year before being included in the study. Of the 44 remaining dogs included in the study, 21 dogs had a history of recurrent UTI (rUTI group). The remaining 23 dogs did not have a history of recurrent UTI (control group) and were included as a control population. Dogs in the rUTI group had a median age of 8 years (range, 1–14 years), whereas dogs in the control group had a median age of 5.5 years (range, 1–11.5 years). Breeds represented in the rUTI group included 3 mixed breeds, 2 Bichon Frise, 2 Golden Retrievers, and 1 each of American Staffordshire Terrier, Beagle, Boston Terrier, Cairn Terrier, Dachshund, Dalmation, English Bulldog, Greyhound, Mastiff, Labrador Retriever, Portuguese Water Dog, Rat Terrier, Rottweiler, and Standard Poodle. Breeds represented in the control group included 14 mixed breeds, 4 Labrador Retrievers, 2 German Shorthair Pointers, and 1 each of American Cocker Spaniel, American Staffordshire Terrier, and Catahoula Leopard Dog. All dogs included in the rUTI group had ≥3 episodes of UTI during the 12‐month period or ≥2 episodes of UTI during the 6‐month period before enrollment in this study. Review of the medical records of dogs with recurrent UTI identified 25 occurrences of underlying disorders that could have contributed to recurrent UTI in 15 of 21 dogs (Table 1). Of the 25 occurrences, 9 different disorders were identified. Seven of 15 dogs had a single disorder identified, whereas 8 of 15 dogs had ≥2 disorders identified. Episioplasty had been performed in 4 of the 21 dogs in the rUTI group, resulting in normal vulvar configuration. All of these dogs, however, had persistent rUTI despite episioplasty. Urinary incontinence was reported in 3 of the 4 dogs and the remaining dog had no underlying disorder identified as a possible cause for recurrent UTI.
Table 1

Distribution of disorders (n = 25) identified in 15 dogs with recurrent UTI that may have contributed to the development of recurrent UTI, divided by class.

Class of DisorderSpecific ConditionNo. of Dogs Affected
Abnormal micturition (n = 8)Incontinence, undetermined cause8
Abnormal anatomy (n = 6)Recessed vulva5
Persistent ligament1
Alteration of urine composition (n = 5)Chronic kidney disease3
Hypoadrenocorticism2
Alteration of urothelium (n = 3)Urolithiasis2
Transitional cell carcinoma1
Impaired immunity (n = 3)Chemotherapy1
Cyclosporine2
Distribution of disorders (n = 25) identified in 15 dogs with recurrent UTI that may have contributed to the development of recurrent UTI, divided by class. The median number of UTIs documented in the lifetime of the dogs in rUTI group was 3 (range, 2–15), with a median of 3 UTIs documented in the year before inclusion in this study (range, 2–8). The most common bacteria historically isolated from the urine of the dogs in the rUTI group was E. coli, which was identified in 15 of the 21 dogs. Other historical isolates from dogs in the rUTI group included Enterococcus (12/21), Proteus (7/21), Staphylococcus (4/21), Streptococcus (3/21), Corynebacterium (1/21), Enterobacter (1/21), Klebsiella (1/21), and Pseudomonas (1/21). The most common antimicrobial used for treatment of historical UTI was amoxicillin‐clavulanic acid (15/21). Other antimicrobials historically used for treatment of UTI in the rUTI group include fluoroquinolones (11/21), cephalosporins (8/21), amoxicillin (6/21), trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole (3/21), and clindamycin (2/21). Urine culture results were available within 1 week of collection of vaginal swabs obtained for this study in 13 of 21 dogs in the rUTI group. Of the 13 samples, 7 (53%) had no growth. Urinary organisms isolated within 1 week of obtaining vaginal samples included E. coli (3/13), Enterococcus faecium (2/13), and Enterococcus faecalis (1/13).

Vaginal Bacterial Populations

Aerobic bacteria were isolated from 19 of 21 (90.5%; 95% CI, 0.68–0.93) dogs in the rUTI group and 18 of 23 (78.3%; 95% CI, 0.56–0.92) dogs in the control group (P = .4). Mixed bacterial populations were common in both groups, with a range of 0–4 (median, 2.0; 95% CI, 0.99–1.96) organisms isolated in dogs in the rUTI group and 0–3 organisms (median, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3–2.5) isolated in dogs in the control group (P = .28). Two or more bacterial species were isolated from 11 of 21 dogs in the rUTI group and 11 of 23 dogs in the control group. The most common bacterial isolates obtained from the vaginal tract of all dogs were E. coli (11/44) and S. pseudintermedius (13/44; Table 2). Escherichia coli was isolated from the vaginal tract of 8 of 21 (38%; 95% CI, 0.19–0.61) dogs in the rUTI group and 3 of 23 (13%; 95% CI, 0.03–0.35) dogs in the control group. Of the 8 dogs in the rUTI group with E. coli isolated from the vaginal tract, 1 had pure growth of E. coli in historical urine cultures, whereas 4 dogs had various organisms isolated in historical urine cultures including E. coli, and the remaining 3 dogs did not have E. coli isolated in historical urine cultures. Staphylococcus pseudintermedius was isolated from the vaginal tract of 7 of 21 (33%; 95% CI, 0.15–0.57) dogs in the rUTI group and 6 of 23 (26%; 95% CI, 0.11–0.48) dogs in the control group (P = .74). Various Enterococcus species, including E. faecalis (7), E. durans (4), E. avium (3), and E. gallinarum (1) were obtained from the vaginal tract of all dogs. These Enterococcus species were isolated from the vaginal tract as single or multiple isolates from 8 of 21 dogs in the rUTI group and 4 of 23 dogs in the control group. Additional aerobic bacteria isolated with a low incidence included Pasteurella canis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, Sphingomonas paucimobilis, Streptococcus spp., Corynebacterium spp., Bacillus spp., and Enterobacter spp.
Table 2

Types of bacteria isolated from the vaginal tract of dogs with recurrent UTI and normal dogs.

 rUTI (n = 21)Control (n = 23)
LAB (Enterococcus canintestini) 25
Staphylococcus pseudintermedius 76
Group G Streptococcus 36
Enterococcus spp.114
E. coli 83
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 22
Pasteurella canis 01
Proteus mirabilis 41
Sphingomonas paucimobilis 01
Bacillus spp.02
Corynebactierium spp.21
Enterobacter spp.22
Total organisms4035
Average organisms/animal1.91.5
Types of bacteria isolated from the vaginal tract of dogs with recurrent UTI and normal dogs. Five of 13 dogs in the rUTI group for which urine culture results were available had isolates of either E. coli or Enterococcus spp. in both urine and vaginal samples. Of these, 3 had identical cultures, 1 each for E. coli, Enterococcus faecium, and Enterococcus faecalis, whereas 2 dogs had pure growth of E. coli in urine and a mixed flora, including E. coli, in the vagina. Of the 7 dogs from the rUTI group with E. coli cultured from the vaginal sample for which concurrent urine culture was available, 3 had no growth on urine culture and 1 had Enterococcus faecium on urine culture (positive predictive value within the rUTI group, 0.43). Lactic acid‐producing bacteria were isolated on Rogosa agar from 7 of the 44 dogs. Two of these 7 dogs were in the rUTI group (2/21, 9.5%; 95% CI, 0.02–0.32) and 5 of the 7 dogs were in the control group (5/23, 21.7%; 95% CI, 0.08–0.44). There was no significant difference in the frequency of vaginal LAB populations between these 2 groups of dogs (P = .42). Lactic acid‐producing bacteria isolated from the vaginal tract of these 7 dogs by LAB selective enrichment were identified as Enterococcus canintestini by sequencing.

Discussion

This study is the first to describe the vaginal microbiota of healthy spayed dogs and spayed dogs with rUTI. The results of this study suggest that there is no significant difference in the vaginal microbiota of healthy spayed dogs and those with recurrent UTI. Escherichia coli and S. pseudintermedius were the most prevalent organisms obtained from the vaginal tract of dogs in this study, whereas Enterococcus canintestini was the most common LAB isolated. The prevalence of common uropathogens, such as E. coli and S. pseudintermedius, was similar between the rUTI and control groups, but E. coli tended to be more common in patients with rUTI. Additionally, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the frequency of LAB isolated from the vaginal tract. LAB was an uncommon isolate in the vaginal vault of dogs in this study. The most commonly isolated LAB from the vaginal microbiota of the dogs in this study was Enterococcus canintestini, whereas Lactobacillus species were not isolated. In health, Lactobacillus species are the predominant LAB of the vaginal tract of women.8, 15 However, this study demonstrates that this may not be true in dogs. Lactobacillus and certain Enterococcus species are both gram positive bacteria that are characterized as LAB. Both of these genera of bacteria have potential antimicrobial properties, such as production of lactic acid resulting in an acidic environment, bacteriocin, and hydrogen peroxide, which have been shown to regulate other urogenital microbiota.16, 17 Therefore, the presence of Enterococcus canintestini in the vagina of dogs may exert selective pressure on other bacteria as does Lactobacillus in the vagina of women. In contrast to a previous study evaluating the vaginal microbiota in intact bitches, this study found a low incidence of LAB in both groups and a complete absence of Lactobacillus species. In a previous study, LAB were identified in 41 of 42 ill and healthy female dogs.11 In our study, only 7 of 44 spayed female dogs had vaginal colonization by LAB. One possible explanation of this difference is that an unguarded swab was used to obtain cultures in the previous study, allowing for sampling from the vestibule, vulva, and vagina. The use of a guarded swab in our study limited the cultures to only the vagina. The contrasting results may indicate variable bacterial colonization of LAB even within the vestibule, vulva, and vagina of dogs. Alternatively, the aforementioned study was completed in a different geographical region and the contrasting results may be a result of geographical variation in normal canine vaginal microbiota. In the present study, Rogosa agar supported the growth of Enterococcus canintestini, thereby resulting in initial overestimation of presumptive Lactobacillus species within the vaginal microbiota of these dogs. However, all isolates on Rogosa agar in this study were identified as Enterococcus canintestini. Because Lactobacillus and Enterococcus species are both gram positive, LAB, and both may grow on Rogosa agar, they may not be easily distinguished by conventional bacteriological analysis.18 Therefore, the use of more advanced techniques, such as sequencing, is recommended in future studies investigating the prevalence of these bacterial species in the vaginal tract of dogs. In health, LAB, specifically lactobacilli, are the predominant colonizers of the vaginal tract of women.8, 15 However, women with recurrent UTI often have alterations in vaginal flora, namely increased colonization by uropathogens and depletion of lactobacilli.9, 19 Unlike the vaginal microbiota of healthy women and women with recurrent UTI, the presence of common uropathogens, such as E. coli and Staphylococcus species, was not significantly different between groups of dogs in the present study. These findings are similar to those of previous studies of intact bitches, which describe the vaginal microbiota of healthy intact female dogs as variable, with normal microbiota characterized by light to moderate growth of a mixed population of bacteria.20 The heterogeneity of the vaginal microbiota of healthy female dogs may account for the lack of statistical difference between the vaginal bacterial populations isolated in the 2 groups. However, it is also possible that a significant difference in the prevalence of specific uropathogens such as E. coli would be identified in a larger study population. Moreover, the present study recorded only the presence or absence of a bacterial strain, and not quantitative absolute colony counts. Thus, it is possible quantification of absolute colony counts may have detected significant differences between the 2 groups. Although research in women suggests that vaginal colonization of uropathogens is correlated with urogenital disease, this has not been demonstrated in the dog to date. Within the rUTI group of the present study, vaginal culture of E. coli was not strongly correlated with urine culture results. Additional diagnostic tests, such as typing by high‐performance liquid chromatography or identification of virulence factors would provide additional insight into the relative importance of E. coli in vaginal microbiota. Prior antibiotic treatment in the dogs with rUTI potentially could impact resistance profiles of the organisms isolated from both the urine and vaginal samples of the dogs included in this study. Ideally, exclusion of dogs receiving antibiotics up to 2 weeks before inclusion in this study limited the impact of recent antimicrobial treatment on the vaginal microbial populations identified in these dogs. However, antimicrobial resistance remains a major emerging problem in both animals and people, and the pressure to develop resistance is exacerbated by repeated antibiotic use.21 This suggests an urgent need for the development of effective therapies that do not rely on repeated antibiotic administration. In conclusion, recurrent UTI in dogs is a well‐recognized condition that is often difficult and expensive to manage. Although the vaginal microbiota is recognized to play a key role in the prevention of recurrent UTI in women, no previous studies have investigated this in dogs. As in women at risk for UTI, this study found a low incidence of LAB in spayed dogs, but no significant difference was identified between spayed dogs with rUTI and healthy spayed dogs. In contrast to other studies in both women and intact dogs, Enterococcus canintestini was the most common LAB isolated from the vagina in this study. Further investigation of the role of this organism in the urogenital tract, as well as the potential presence of LAB in the vestibule and vagina, is warranted in dogs. Moreover, additional study of uropathogens in the vaginal tract of dogs with recurrent UTI, including quantitative absolute colony counts, prevalence of virulence factors associated with urogenital disease, and resistance to commonly used antibiotics, also is warranted in a larger study population.
  21 in total

1.  Long-term study of aerobic bacteria of the genital tract in breeding bitches.

Authors:  L Bjurström; C Linde-Forsberg
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.156

2.  Vaginal lactic acid bacteria in healthy and ill bitches and evaluation of in vitro probiotic activity of selected isolates.

Authors:  Luis Delucchi; Martín Fraga; Karen Perelmuter; Esther Cidade; Pablo Zunino
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Urinary tract infections in women with bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  O H Harmanli; G Y Cheng; P Nyirjesy; A Chatwani; J P Gaughan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 4.  Canine bacterial urinary tract infections: new developments in old pathogens.

Authors:  Mary F Thompson; Annette L Litster; Joanne L Platell; Darren J Trott
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 2.688

5.  Urinary tract infections in pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Linda Hillebrand; Ozgur H Harmanli; Valerie Whiteman; Meena Khandelwal
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Analysis of risk factors associated with antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Mohamed O Ahmed; Nicola J Williams; Peter D Clegg; Jennifer C van Velkinburgh; Keith E Baptiste; Malcolm Bennett
Journal:  Microb Drug Resist       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 3.431

7.  Comparison of two selective media for the detection and enumeration of Lactobacilli in human faeces.

Authors:  M S Jackson; A R Bird; A L McOrist
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.363

Review 8.  Pathogenesis of urinary tract infections with normal female anatomy.

Authors:  Gal Finer; Daniel Landau
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 9.  Diagnosis of urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Joseph W Bartges
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.093

10.  Persistent urinary tract infections and reinfections in 100 dogs (1989-1999).

Authors:  M Alexis Seguin; Shelly L Vaden; Craig Altier; Elizabeth Stone; Jay F Levine
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.333

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  An Overview of Two-Component Signal Transduction Systems Implicated in Extra-Intestinal Pathogenic E. coli Infections.

Authors:  Erin J Breland; Allison R Eberly; Maria Hadjifrangiskou
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 5.293

2.  Characterization of the urinary microbiome in healthy dogs.

Authors:  Erin N Burton; Leah A Cohn; Carol N Reinero; Hans Rindt; Stephen G Moore; Aaron C Ericsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Bacterial microbiome of the nose of healthy dogs and dogs with nasal disease.

Authors:  Barbara Tress; Elisabeth S Dorn; Jan S Suchodolski; Tariq Nisar; Prajesh Ravindran; Karin Weber; Katrin Hartmann; Bianka S Schulz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Canine endometrial and vaginal microbiomes reveal distinct and complex ecosystems.

Authors:  C C Lyman; G R Holyoak; K Meinkoth; X Wieneke; K A Chillemi; U DeSilva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Urinary tract infections: treatment/comparative therapeutics.

Authors:  Shelly J Olin; Joseph W Bartges
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 2.093

6.  Effect of sterilization on the canine vaginal microbiota: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ada Rota; Michela Corrò; Ilaria Patuzzi; Chiara Milani; Stefania Masia; Eleonora Mastrorilli; Sara Petrin; Alessandra Longo; Angela Del Carro; Carmen Losasso
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 7.  The Complex Diseases of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in Canines: Where to Next?

Authors:  Stephanie A Lynch; Karla J Helbig
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2021-01-18

8.  The vaginal microflora changes in various stages of the estrous cycle of healthy female dogs and the ones with genital tract infections.

Authors:  Edyta Golińska; Natalia Sowińska; Anna Tomusiak-Plebanek; Marlena Szydło; Natalia Witka; Joanna Lenarczyk; Magdalena Strus
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 9.  Perspectives and advances in probiotics and the gut microbiome in companion animals.

Authors:  Daniel Lee; Tae Wook Goh; Min Geun Kang; Hye Jin Choi; So Young Yeo; Jungwoo Yang; Chul Sung Huh; Yoo Yong Kim; Younghoon Kim
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2022-03-31

10.  Pyelonephritis in Dogs: Retrospective Study of 47 Histologically Diagnosed Cases (2005-2015).

Authors:  J Bouillon; E Snead; J Caswell; C Feng; P Hélie; J Lemetayer
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.