Literature DB >> 24466469

Adjustment on the Type I Error Rate for a Clinical Trial Monitoring for both Intermediate and Primary Endpoints.

Susan Halabi1.   

Abstract

In many clinical trials, a single endpoint is used to answer the primary question and forms the basis for monitoring the experimental therapy. Many trials are lengthy in duration and investigators are interested in using an intermediate endpoint for an accelerated approval, but will rely on the primary endpoint (such as, overall survival) for the full approval of the drug by the Food and Drug Administration. We have designed a clinical trial where both intermediate (progression-free survival, (PFS)) and primary endpoints (overall survival, (OS)) are used for monitoring the trial so the overall type I error rate is preserved at the pre-specified alpha level of 0.05. A two-stage procedure is used. In the first stage, the Bonferroni correction was used where the global type I error rate was allocated to each of the endpoints. In the next stage, the O'Brien-Fleming approach was used to design the boundary for the interim and final analysis for each endpoint. Data were generated assuming several parametric copulas with exponential marginals. Different degrees of dependence, as measured by Kendall's τ, between OS and PFS were assumed: 0 (independence) 0.3, 0.5 and 0.70. This approach is applied to an example in a prostate cancer trial.

Entities:  

Keywords:  O’Brien-Fleming boundaries; censoring; copula; primary endpoint; sequential methods; time-to-event; two-step procedure

Year:  2012        PMID: 24466469      PMCID: PMC3898520          DOI: 10.4172/2155-6180.S7-015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biom Biostat


  10 in total

1.  Designing complex group sequential survival trials.

Authors:  Edward Lakatos
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  An adaptive approach to implementing bivariate group sequential clinical trial designs.

Authors:  Susan Todd
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 3.  Accelerated approval of oncology products: a decade of experience.

Authors:  Ramzi Dagher; John Johnson; Grant Williams; Patricia Keegan; Richard Pazdur
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-10-20       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Guidelines for monitoring efficacy and toxicity responses in clinical trials.

Authors:  R J Cook; V T Farewell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Group sequential tests for bivariate response: interim analyses of clinical trials with both efficacy and safety endpoints.

Authors:  C Jennison; B W Turnbull
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Sequential methods based on the boundaries approach for the clinical comparison of survival times.

Authors:  J Whitehead
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994 Jul 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials.

Authors:  P C O'Brien; T R Fleming
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  End points and United States Food and Drug Administration approval of oncology drugs.

Authors:  John R Johnson; Grant Williams; Richard Pazdur
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Progression-free survival as a predictor of overall survival in men with castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Susan Halabi; Nicholas J Vogelzang; San-San Ou; Kouros Owzar; Laura Archer; Eric J Small
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Multinational, double-blind, phase III study of prednisone and either satraplatin or placebo in patients with castrate-refractory prostate cancer progressing after prior chemotherapy: the SPARC trial.

Authors:  Cora N Sternberg; Daniel P Petrylak; Oliver Sartor; J Alfred Witjes; Tomasz Demkow; Jean-Marc Ferrero; Jean-Christophe Eymard; Silvia Falcon; Fabio Calabrò; Nicholas James; Istvan Bodrogi; Peter Harper; Manfred Wirth; William Berry; Michael E Petrone; Thomas J McKearn; Mojtaba Noursalehi; Martine George; Marcel Rozencweig
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 44.544

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  A novel test to compare two treatments based on endpoints involving both nonfatal and fatal events.

Authors:  Richard F Potthoff; Susan Halabi
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 1.894

2.  Group-sequential logrank methods for trial designs using bivariate non-competing event-time outcomes.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Sugimoto; Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Scott R Evans; Susan Halabi
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 1.588

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.