Literature DB >> 24466400

Which patients are at higher risk for residual valves after posterior urethral valve ablation?

Mehdi Shirazi1, Mohamadreza Farsiani1, Mohammad Natami1, Kiomars Izadpanah1, Amir Malekahmadi1, Abbasali Khakbaz1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To find patients at high risk of obstructive remnant leaflets after valve ablation among boys with posterior urethral valve (PUV), we evaluated any possible relationship between preoperative findings in our patients and residual obstructive leaflets after valve ablation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 55 patients with PUV that was treated by the same surgeon between 2008 and 2012. Of these, 37 patients (67.3%) had no obstructive remnant leaflets (group A) and 18 patients (32.7%) had obstructive remnant leaflets (group B) in follow-up cystoscopy. Preoperative clinical and radiological findings were evaluated and compared between the groups.
RESULTS: AMONG ALL THE PREOPERATIVE DATA WE EXAMINED, THE ANALYSIS REVEALED THAT AGE AT THE TIME OF SURGERY (MEDIAN AGE: group A, 15 months; group B, 7 months; p=0.017), echogenicity of kidneys (p<0.05), presence of vesicoureteral reflux (p<0.05), and grade of reflux (p<0.05) were significantly different between the groups. Method of valve ablation, anterior-posterior diameters of the renal pelvis, renal cortical thickness, bladder wall thickening, and scarring on the dimercaptosuccinic acid scan showed no significant differences between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In our patients, younger age at surgery time, hyperechogenicity of renal parenchyma, presence of vesicoureteral reflux, and grade 4 or 5 reflux before surgery had a significant relationship with residual valves. More studies may result in enhanced management of patients at high risk of residual valves after PUV ablation, because the sooner the obstruction is resolved entirely, the better the outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Posterior urethral valves; Preoperative findings; Residual valve; Valve ablation

Year:  2014        PMID: 24466400      PMCID: PMC3897633          DOI: 10.4111/kju.2014.55.1.64

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Urol        ISSN: 2005-6737


  19 in total

1.  The predictive value of a repeat micturating cystourethrogram for remnant leaflets after primary endoscopic ablation of posterior urethral valves.

Authors:  Naima Smeulders; Erica Makin; Divyesh Desai; Patrick G Duffy; Costa Healy; Peter M Cuckow; Abaraham Cherian; Melanie P Hiorns; Imran Mushtaq
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.830

2.  A method to assess posterior urethral valve ablation.

Authors:  O Bani Hani; K Prelog; G H H Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Surgical complications of posterior urethral valve ablation: 20 years experience.

Authors:  Osama Sarhan; Alaa El-Ghoneimi; Ashraf Hafez; Mohamed Dawaba; Ahmad Ghali; El-Houssiny Ibrahiem
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Urethral ratio on voiding cystourethrogram: a comparative method to assess success of posterior urethral valve ablation.

Authors:  Rahul K Gupta; Hemanshi S Shah; Vinay Jadhav; Abhaya Gupta; Advait Prakash; Bejal Sanghvi; Sandesh V Parelkar
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 1.830

5.  Residual valve and stricture after posterior urethral valve ablation: how to evaluate?

Authors:  Tayfun Oktar; Emre Salabas; Omer Acar; Arda Atar; Ismet Nane; Haluk Ander; Orhan Ziylan
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 1.830

6.  A plea for standardized grading of vesicoureteral reflux.

Authors:  J W Duckett; M F Bellinger
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Posterior urethral valves: multivariate analysis of factors affecting the final renal outcome.

Authors:  Osama M Sarhan; Alaa A El-Ghoneimi; Tamer E Helmy; Mohamed S Dawaba; Ahmad M Ghali; El-Houssiny I Ibrahiem
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Prognostic factors in prenatally-detected posterior urethral valves: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Eduardo A Oliveira; Eli A S Rabelo; Alamanda K Pereira; José S Diniz; Antônio C V Cabral; Henrique Vitor Leite; José M P Silva; Tiago A Fagundes
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2002-09-13       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  Posterior urethral valves: does young age at diagnosis correlate with poor renal function?

Authors:  M T El-Sherbiny; A T Hafez; A A Shokeir
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  The long-term outcome of posterior urethral valves treated with primary valve ablation and observation.

Authors:  G H Smith; D A Canning; S L Schulman; H M Snyder; J W Duckett
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  3 in total

1.  Can the posterior:anterior urethral ratio on voiding cystourethrogram be used as a reliable predictor of successful posterior urethral valve ablation in male children?

Authors:  Zakiyah Gaibie; Nasreen Mahomed; Karen L Petersen; Glenda Moonsamy; Akram A H Bokhari; Ahmed Adam
Journal:  SA J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-09

Review 2.  Predicting and Modifying Risk for Development of Renal Failure in Boys with Posterior Urethral Valves.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Diana K Bowen
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Posterior Urethral Valves in Children: Pattern of Presentation and Outcome of Initial Treatment in Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

Authors:  Ademola Olusegun Talabi; Oludayo Adedapo Sowande; Amarachukwu Chiduziem Etonyeaku; Abdulkadir A Salako; Olusanya Adejuyigbe
Journal:  Niger J Surg       Date:  2015 Jul-Dec
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.