| Literature DB >> 24465985 |
Matthew W Dray1, Thomas W Crowther2, Stephen M Thomas1, A Donald A'Bear1, Douglas L Godbold3, Steve J Ormerod1, Susan E Hartley4, T Hefin Jones1.
Abstract
Elevated atmospheric class="Chemical">CO2 can change foliar tissue chemistry. This alters leaf litter palatability to macroinvertebrate detritivores with c<class="Species">span class="Species">onsequences for decomposition, nutrient turnover, and food-web structure. Currently there is no consensus on the link between CO2 enrichment, litter chemistry, and macroinvertebrate-mediated leaf decomposition. To identify any unifying mechanisms, we presented eight invertebrate species from aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems with litter from Alnus glutinosa (common alder) or Betula pendula (silver birch) trees propagated under ambient (380 ppm) or elevated (ambient +200 ppm) CO2 concentrations. Alder litter was largely unaffected by CO2 enrichment, but birch litter from leaves grown under elevated CO2 had reduced nitrogen concentrations and greater C/N ratios. Invertebrates were provided individually with either (i) two litter discs, one of each CO2 treatment ('choice'), or (ii) one litter disc of each CO2 treatment alone ('no-choice'). Consumption was recorded. Only Odontocerum albicorne showed a feeding preference in the choice test, consuming more ambient- than elevated-CO2 birch litter. Species' responses to alder were highly idiosyncratic in the no-choice test: Gammarus pulex and O. albicorne consumed more elevated-CO2 than ambient-CO2 litter, indicating compensatory feeding, while Oniscus asellus consumed more of the ambient-CO2 litter. No species responded to CO2 treatment when fed birch litter. Overall, these results show how elevated atmospheric CO2 can alter litter chemistry, affecting invertebrate feeding behaviour in species-specific ways. The data highlight the need for greater species-level information when predicting changes to detrital processing-a key ecosystem function-under atmospheric change.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24465985 PMCID: PMC3899220 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086246
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Overview of the experimental approach.
Litter was produced under ambient- and elevated-CO2 atmospheres at BangorFACE, UK. Half of the litter from each CO2 treatment was conditioned aquatically and half terrestrially. Chemical analyses of the conditioned litter were undertaken, and litter discs were presented to aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates in choice and no-choice tests. Only one tree and one invertebrate species have been shown for clarity. Not to scale.
Detritivorous macroinvertebrate species used in the study.
| Habitat | Name | Authority | Order: Family |
| Aquatic |
| (Linnaeus 1758) | Isopoda: Asellidae |
|
| (Linnaeus 1758) | Amphipoda: Gammaridae | |
|
| (Scopoli 1763) | Trichoptera: Odontoceridae | |
|
| (Kirby & Spence 1826) | Trichoptera: Sericostomatidae | |
| Terrestrial |
| (Bosc 1792) | Julida: Blaniulidae |
|
| Linnaeus 1758 | Isopoda: Oniscidae | |
|
| Latreille 1804 | Isopoda: Porcellionidae | |
|
| (Leach 1815) | Julida: Julidae |
ANOVA summary table of main and interactive effects of CO2 treatment (CO2) and conditioning type (CT) on litter chemistry.
| Carbon | Nitrogen | Phosphorus | Lignin | C/N | |||||||
| Tree species | Variables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Alder | CO2 | 0.6 | 0.435 | 1.1 | 0.305 | 2.8 | 0.117 | 0.04 | 0.543 | 1.3 | 0.271 |
| CT | 0.3 | 0.577 | 4.1 | 0.059 | 0.2 | 0.684 | 0.2 | 0.673 | 3.8 | 0.071 | |
| CO2 × CT | 1.5 | 0.241 | 4.7 |
| 0.4 | 0.387 | 3.6 | 0.082 | 4 | 0.064 | |
| Birch | CO2 | 0.1 | 0.712 | 791 |
| 3.1 | 0.098 | 4.8 |
| 605.3 |
|
| CT | 12.1 |
| 95 |
| 0.04 | 0.848 | 1 | 0.331 | 62.5 |
| |
| CO2 × CT | 3.6 | 0.077 | 36.4 |
| 0.3 | 0.566 | 0.1 | 0.756 | 6.8 |
| |
P values <0.05 are emboldened.
Chemical composition of leaf litter (mean ±1 SEM).
| Chemical composition | Chemical ratios | |||||||
| Tree species | CT | CO2 | Carbon(% DM) | Nitrogen(% DM) | Phosphorus(% DM) | Lignin(% ABSL) | C/N | Lignin/N |
| Alder | Aquatic | Ambient | 48.61±0.37a | 3.73±0.16a | 0.074±0.009a | 22.17±2.64a | 13.11±0.16a | 5.94 |
| Elevated | 48.48±0.25a | 3.63±0.091a | 0.064±0.009a | 19.56±2.74a | 13.37±0.36a | 5.38 | ||
| Terrestrial | Ambient | 48.04±0.22a | 3.35±0.016a | 0.084±0.009a | 19.16±1.01a | 14.33±0.02a | 5.71 | |
| Elevated | 48.68±0.40a | 3.65±0.026b | 0.062±0.01a | 24.34±1.14a | 13.35±0.10a | 6.68 | ||
| Birch | Aquatic | Ambient | 51.22±0.13a | 2.54±0.018a | 0.09±0.008a | 22.10±3.28a | 20.17±0.11a | 8.7 |
| Elevated | 50.84±0.13a | 1.79±0.004b | 0.066±0.01a | 27.76±1.69a | 28.47±0.08b | 15.55 | ||
| Terrestrial | Ambient | 49.86±0.24a | 3.08±0.017a | 0.082±0.01a | 25.09±2.07a | 16.19±0.04a | 8.15 | |
| Elevated | 50.44±0.41a | 1.91±0.063b | 0.07±0.006a | 29.32±1.52a | 26.47±0.74b | 15.33 | ||
Abbreviations: percent dry mass (% DM), percent acetyl-bromide-soluble lignin (% ABSL), conditioning type (CT).
Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05) between CO2 treatments for each tree species × CT combination.
Figure 2Effects of CO2 treatment on feeding responses of each invertebrate species.
The mean litter consumption (±1 SE) of each invertebrate species is shown for (A) alder and (B) birch in the choice test, and (C) alder and (D) birch in the no-choice test. Asterisks indicate significant differences between CO2 treatments within each invertebrate species (***P<0.001). Species are arranged by habitat of origin: aquatic species are Asellus aquaticus (Aa), Gammarus pulex (Gp), Odontocerum albicorne (Oa) and Sericostoma personatum (Sp); terrestrial species are Blaniulus guttulatus (Bg), Oniscus asellus (On), Porcellio scaber (Ps) and Tachypodoiulus niger (Tn).