| Literature DB >> 24465567 |
Justina Hessel1, Jonna Heldrich2, Jennifer Fuller2, Michelle R Staudt2, Sharon Radisch2, Charleen Hollmann2, Ben-Gary Harvey1, Robert J Kaner1, Jacqueline Salit2, Jenny Yee-Levin1, Sriram Sridhar3, Sreekumar Pillai3, Holly Hilton3, Gerhard Wolff3, Hans Bitter3, Sudha Visvanathan3, Jay Fine3, Christopher S Stevenson3, Ronald G Crystal4, Ann E Tilley4.
Abstract
Smoking and COPD are associated with decreased mucociliary clearance, and healthy smokers have shorter cilia in the large airway than nonsmokers. We hypothesized that changes in cilia length are consistent throughout the airway, and we further hypothesized that smokers with COPD have shorter cilia than healthy smokers. Because intraflagellar transport (IFT) is the process by which cilia of normal length are produced and maintained, and alterations in IFT lead to short cilia in model organisms, we also hypothesized that smoking induces changes in the expression of IFT-related genes in the airway epithelium of smokers and smokers with COPD. To assess these hypotheses, airway epithelium was obtained via bronchoscopic brushing. Cilia length was assessed by measuring 100 cilia (10 cilia on each of 10 cells) per subject and Affymetrix microarrays were used to evaluate IFT gene expression in nonsmokers and healthy smokers in 2 independent data sets from large and small airway as well as in COPD smokers in a data set from the small airway. In the large and small airway epithelium, cilia were significantly shorter in healthy smokers than nonsmokers, and significantly shorter in COPD smokers than in both healthy smokers and nonsmokers. The gene expression data confirmed that a set of 8 IFT genes were down-regulated in smokers in both data sets; however, no differences were seen in COPD smokers compared to healthy smokers. These results support the concept that loss of cilia length contributes to defective mucociliary clearance in COPD, and that smoking-induced changes in expression of IFT genes may be one mechanism of abnormally short cilia in smokers. Strategies to normalize cilia length may be an important avenue for novel COPD therapies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24465567 PMCID: PMC3896362 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085453
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographics1.
| Parameter | Gene expression | Cilia length | ||||||||||
| Large airway epithelium (n = 52) | Small airway epithelium (n = 156) | Large airway epithelium (n = 120) | Small airway epithelium (n = 108) | |||||||||
| Healthynonsmokers | Healthysmokers | Healthynonsmokers | Healthysmokers | COPDsmokers | Healthynonsmokers | Healthysmokers | COPDsmokers | Healthynonsmokers | Healthysmokers | COPDsmokers | ||
| Number of subjects | 21 | 31 | 28 | 69 | 59 | 25 | 25 | 70 | 20 | 32 | 56 | |
| Sex (male/female) | 15/6 | 21/10 | 15/13 | 52/17 | 54/5 | 14/11 | 20/5 | 57/13 | 12/8 | 24/8 | 46/10 | |
| Age (yr) | 41±8 | 44±6 | 39±12 | 46±9 | 54±8 | 38±11 | 49±5 | 53±8 | 40±11 | 48±5 | 54±9 | |
| Ethnicity (W/B/H/O) | 8/17/4/2 | 6/17/6/2 | 8/10/10/0 | 9/38/19/3 | 14/32/12/1 | 5/9/11/0 | 4/13/6/2 | 22/31/14/3 | 5/8/7/0 | 6/16/8/2 | 20/28/7/1 | |
| Height (inches) | 69±4 | 67±3 | 67±3 | 68±4 | 70±3 | 67±3 | 68±4 | 69±4 | 67±3 | 68±4 | 69±4 | |
| Smoking history (pk-yr) | N/A | 28±18 | N/A | 23±11 | 33±14 | N/A | 32.5±10 | 39±21 | N/A | 29±11 | 37±18 | |
| Pulmonary function | ||||||||||||
| FEV1 (% predicted) | 107±16 | 113±13 | 107±10 | 110±10 | 94±18 | 106±11 | 114±9 | 90±25 | 108±10 | 111±10 | 80±28 | |
| FVC (% predicted) | 106±13 | 113±13 | 107±11 | 110±11 | 100±22 | 106±11 | 110±8 | 87±20 | 106±10 | 111±9 | 85±21 | |
| FEV1/FVC (% observed) | 83±4 | 82±4 | 83±5 | 80±5 | 63±7 | 83±5 | 79±4 | 61±9 | 81±5 | 79±5 | 59±11 | |
| ΔFEV1 (L) | – | – | – | – | 0.17±0.15 | – | – | 0.16±0.17 | – | – | 0.20±0.16 | |
| ΔFEV1 (%) | – | – | – | – | 6±6 | – | – | 6±7 | – | – | 6±5 | |
| ΔFVC (L) | – | – | – | – | 0.17±0.67 | – | – | 0.12±0.21 | – | – | 0.13±0.24 | |
| ΔFVC (%) | – | – | – | – | 2±5 | – | – | 4±8 | – | – | 3±6 | |
| TLC (% predicted) | 100±13 | 103±12 | 99±15 | 94±15 | 101±13 | 100±16 | 100±11 | 99±13 | 100±14 | 100±13 | 95±12 | |
| RV/TLC (%) | – | – | – | – | 33±9 | – | – | 36±11 | – | – | 33±9 | |
| DLCO (% predicted) | 94±12 | 95±11 | 91±12 | 88±8 | 71±15 | 89±10 | 90±8 | 69±17 | 89±10 | 90±8 | 68±18 | |
| DLCO/VA (% predicted) | – | – | – | – | 83±17 | – | – | 81±18 | – | – | 85±16 | |
| GOLD stage (I/II/III/IV) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 38/20/1/0 | N/A | N/A | 33/30/7/0 | N/A | N/A | 17/30/8/1 | |
| Exacerbations/yr | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 0.0±0.3 | N/A | N/A | 0.2±0.8 | N/A | N/A | 0.3±0.9 | |
| MMRC | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 0.6±0.7 | N/A | N/A | 0.7±1.0 | N/A | N/A | 0.7±0.9 | |
| SGRQ | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 21±16 | N/A | N/A | 23±17 | N/A | N/A | 22±17 | |
| HRCT %LAA |
|
| 1.8±1.8 | 1.3±1.0 | 3.6±3.4 | 2.2±1.9 | 1.3±0.9 | 3.3±2.8 | 2.2±1.9 | 1.5±1.0 | 3.7±3.6 | |
| Cell Differentials | ||||||||||||
| Epithelial (%) | 99.8±0.5 | 99.8±0.4 | 99.0±0.9 | 99.2±0.8 | 97.5±7.8 | 98.6±1.1 | 99.1±0.9 | 99.2±0.9 | 98.8±0.8 | 98.6±1.2 | 96.1±9.3 | |
| Inflammatory (%) | 0.2±0.5 | 0.2±0.4 | 0.9±0.8 | 0.7±0.8 | 2.5±7.8 | 1.4±1.1 | 0.9±0.9 | 1.8±0.9 | 1.2±0.7 | 1.4±1.2 | 3.9±9.3 | |
| Ciliated (%) | 52.2±8.3 | 47.0±13.2 | 71.1±5.4 | 64.4±7.0 | 60.4±8.8 | 52.9±8.8 | 44.1±9.1 | 38.3±12.4 | 71.6±4.4 | 65.4±5.7 | 56.7±12.8 | |
| Secretory (%) | 10.7±4.6 | 10.3±4.0 | 9.9±4.4 | 12.6±6.7 | 15.1±6.8 | 7.9±3.1 | 9.6±5.2 | 16.4±10.8 | 10.0±3.5 | 13.7±6.9 | 16.7±8.5 | |
| Undifferentiated (%) | 16.0±8.8 | 18.0±10.0 | 7.5±3.6 | 14.3±8.2 | 13.6±7.2 | 12.4±6.7 | 19.7±11.3 | 22.4±13.1 | 7.2±2.7 | 11.8±5.5 | 12.4±6.5 | |
| Basal (%) | 21.3±5.0 | 24.8±9.8 | 10.6±7.0 | 7.6±5.2 | 8.2±6.7 | 25.5±8.2 | 26.9±9.2 | 21.7±13.2 | 11.1±6.8 | 7.8±5.7 | 10.4±7.6 | |
1 Values shown are mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise noted.
2 Data are shown for subjects who contributed samples for gene expression analysis.
3 Data are shown for subjects who contributed samples for cilia length assessment.
4 3rd–4th order airway epithelium obtained by bronchoscopic brushing.
5 10th–12th order airway epithelium obtained by bronchoscopic brushing.
6 Ethnicity is indicated as White (W), Black (B), Hispanic (H), Other (O).
7 Spirometry values shown are pre-bronchodilator. FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in one second. FEV = forced vital capacity. TLC = total lung capacity. DLCO = diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide.
8 The response to bronchodilator is shown as change in volume and % change for FEV1 and FVC for COPD subjects.
9 The ratio of residual volume (RV) to total lung capacity (TLC) is shown as a % for COPD subjects.
10 The DLCO adjusted for alveolar volume (VA) is shown as % predicted for COPD subjects.
11 As defined by the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease criteria based on post-bronchodilator spirometry.
12 The Modified Medical Research Council dyspnea score ranges from 0–4 with higher scores reflecting a greater degree of dyspnea.
13 The St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire measures the impact of COPD on overall health, daily life and well-being; scores range from 0–100 with higher scores = more limitations.
14% Low attenuation area is defined as the % of lung volume with attenuation values ≤ −950 Hounsfield units on quantitative analysis of HRCT.
No CT data available for subjects in this group.
Figure 1Cilia length in the large and small airway of nonsmokers, healthy smokers, and COPD smokers.
Mean cilia length in micrometers is displayed on the ordinate. The abscissa displays large airway on the left and small airway on the right, with healthy nonsmokers represented in white, healthy smokers in dark gray, and smokers with COPD in black. Error bars show the standard error of the mean for each phenotype. Within the large airway, n = 120 (healthy nonsmokers n = 25, healthy smokers n = 25, smokers with COPD n = 70). Within the small airway, n = 108 (healthy nonsmokers n = 20, healthy smokers n = 32, smokers with COPD n = 56). There are significant differences in mean cilia length between all phenotypes in both the large and small airway (p<0.05). There are significant differences in mean cilia length between airway locations in both healthy nonsmokers and healthy smokers (p<0.05).
Figure 2Correlation between mean cilia length and lung function.
Each triangle represents one subject, with nonsmokers represented by green triangles, healthy smokers by yellow triangles, and COPD smokers by red triangles. A. Correlation of FEV1 with mean cilia length in large airway epithelium. The ordinate represents FEV1 (% predicted) and the abscissa represents mean cilia length in the LAE. B. Correlation of FEV1/FVC with mean cilia length in the small airway epithelium. The ordinate represents FEV1/FVC (% observed) and the abscissa represents mean cilia length in the SAE.
Figure 3Expression of intraflagellar transport (IFT)-related genes significantly modified by smoking in the airway epithelium.
Gene expression was assessed in nonsmokers and healthy smokers by microarray analysis in two independent data sets. The ordinate represents relative gene expression and specific genes are displayed on the abscissa. Nonsmokers are represented by light bars and healthy smokers by dark gray bars. Error bars represent standard error of the mean and p values are calculated using the Benjamini-Hochberg correction. Significant p values are displayed in bold font. Where multiple probe sets represent the same gene, the probe set with the lowest p value is displayed; where p values are identical, the probe set with highest fold-change is displayed. A. Expression in the large airway epithelium (nonsmokers n = 21 and healthy smokers n = 31). B. Expression in the small airway epithelium (nonsmokers n = 28 and healthy smokers n = 69).
Figure 4Correlation of cilia length with gene expression in the small airway epithelium.
The ordinate represents mean cilia length for each individual and the abscissa represents relative gene expression. Each individual is represented by a triangle with nonsmokers represented by green triangles, healthy smokers by yellow triangles, and COPD smokers by red triangles. A. Correlation of cilia length with KIF3A expression. B. Correlation of cilia length with TRAF3IP1 expression. C. Correlation of cilia length with IFT57 expression. D. Correlation of cilia length with IFT43 expression. E. Correlation of cilia length with WDR19 expression.