Literature DB >> 24464655

Effect of odor preexposure on acquisition of an odor discrimination in dogs.

Nathaniel J Hall1, David W Smith, Clive D L Wynne.   

Abstract

In two experiments, we investigated the impact of odor preexposure treatments on the acquisition of an olfactory discrimination in dogs. In the first experiment, four groups of dogs were each given five days' odor-exposure treatment prior to discrimination training. Dogs in the exposure group were exposed to anise extract (S+) for 30 min daily. Dogs in the Pavlovian-relevant pairing group received six daily delayed-conditioning trials to the same S+. The Pavlovian-irrelevant pairing group received conditioning trials to almond extract (S'). Dogs in the control group received no pretreatment. All of the dogs were then trained to detect S+ from a background pine odor (an AX-vs.-X discrimination). The Pavlovian-relevant pairing group acquired the odor discrimination significantly faster than all of the other exposure and control groups, and the remaining groups acquired the discrimination at the same rate as the no-exposure control group. In a second experiment, we extended these results to a within-subjects design using an AX-versus-BX discrimination. Six dogs were simultaneously trained on two different odor discriminations, one discrimination in which the S+ was previously Pavlovian conditioned, and one discrimination in which the S+ was novel. All of the dogs learned the odor discrimination with the previously conditioned S+ faster than they learned the novel odor discrimination, replicating the results of Experiment 1, and demonstrating that familiarity in the form of Pavlovian conditioning enhances odor-discrimination training. The potential mechanisms of the facilitated transfer of a Pavlovian conditioned stimulus to discrimination training are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24464655     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-013-0133-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.926


  11 in total

1.  EFFECT OF PRIOR PAVLOVIAN DISCRIMINATION TRAINING UPON LEARNING AN OPERANT DISCRIMINATION.

Authors:  G BOWER; T GRUSEC
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Broad activation of the olfactory bulb produces long-lasting changes in odor perception.

Authors:  Nathalie Mandairon; Conor Stack; Carly Kiselycznyk; Christiane Linster
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Enrichment to odors improves olfactory discrimination in adult rats.

Authors:  Nathalie Mandairon; Conor Stack; Carly Kiselycznyk; Christiane Linster
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Perceptual learning in flavour aversion conditioning.

Authors:  N J Mackintosh; H Kaye; C H Bennett
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1991-08

5.  Odor-reward learning and enrichment have similar effects on odor perception.

Authors:  Olga Escanilla; Nathalie Mandairon; Christiane Linster
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-03-28

6.  Transfer of Pavlovian differential conditioning to an operant discrimination.

Authors:  R L Mellgren; J W Ost
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1969-03

7.  Olfactory sensitivity of rats reared in an odorous or deodorized environment.

Authors:  D G Laing; H Panhuber
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1980-10

8.  Olfactory detection of human bladder cancer by dogs: proof of principle study.

Authors:  Carolyn M Willis; Susannah M Church; Claire M Guest; W Andrew Cook; Noel McCarthy; Anthea J Bransbury; Martin R T Church; John C T Church
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-09-25

9.  Olfaction-based Detection Distance: A Quantitative Analysis of How Far Away Dogs Recognize Tortoise Odor and Follow It to Source.

Authors:  Mary E Cablk; John C Sagebiel; Jill S Heaton; Cindee Valentin
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 10.  Can theories of animal discrimination explain perceptual learning in humans?

Authors:  Chris Mitchell; Geoffrey Hall
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  6 in total

1.  Training with varying odor concentrations: implications for odor detection thresholds in canines.

Authors:  Mallory T DeChant; Nathaniel J Hall
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 2.  When the Nose Doesn't Know: Canine Olfactory Function Associated With Health, Management, and Potential Links to Microbiota.

Authors:  Eileen K Jenkins; Mallory T DeChant; Erin B Perry
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-03-29

3.  Canine scent detection of canine cancer: a feasibility study.

Authors:  David C Dorman; Melanie L Foster; Katherine E Fernhoff; Paul R Hess
Journal:  Vet Med (Auckl)       Date:  2017-10-26

4.  Canine Olfactory Thresholds to Amyl Acetate in a Biomedical Detection Scenario.

Authors:  Astrid R Concha; Claire M Guest; Rob Harris; Thomas W Pike; Alexandre Feugier; Helen Zulch; Daniel S Mills
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-01-22

5.  Influence of gender, neuter status, and training method on police dog narcotics olfaction performance, behavior and welfare.

Authors:  Azhar F Abdel Fattah; Shereen El Abdel-Hamid
Journal:  J Adv Vet Anim Res       Date:  2020-10-07

Review 6.  The Shape of the Nasal Cavity and Adaptations to Sniffing in the Dog (Canis familiaris) Compared to Other Domesticated Mammals: A Review Article.

Authors:  Anna Buzek; Katarzyna Serwańska-Leja; Anita Zaworska-Zakrzewska; Małgorzata Kasprowicz-Potocka
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.