Literature DB >> 24464347

Management of cesarean scar pregnancy with suction curettage: a report of four cases and review of the literature.

Yeşim Bayoglu Tekin1, Ulku Mete Ural, Gulşah Balık, Isık Ustuner, Figen Kır Şahin, Emine Seda Güvendağ Güven.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present the outcomes of four cases of cesarean scar pregnancy treated with suction curettage.
METHODS: Four patients were ultrasonographically diagnosed with cesarean scar pregnancies treated with suction curettage in a tertiary care center.
RESULTS: Serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin levels ranged between 1,681 and 15,573 mU/mL, gestational sac diameter measured from 10 to 24 mm and scar thickness was between 4.7 and 6.8 mm. All patients underwent suction curettage under general anesthesia with transabdominal ultrasonography guidance. No complications were observed during or after operation.
CONCLUSION: Suction curettage is a viable alternative for conservative treatment in selected cases of patients who are diagnosed with CSP early in gestation and who have a myometrial thickness of more than 4.5 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24464347     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-014-3143-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  5 in total

1.  Management of persistent caesarean scar pregnancy after curettage treatment failure.

Authors:  Zhi-Da Qian; Yue Weng; Yong-Jiang Du; Chun-Fen Wang; Li-Li Huang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE) versus Laparoscopic Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Debridement Surgery (LCSPDS) in Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.

Authors:  Junhong Guo; Jiangtao Yu; Qing Zhang; Xiaojie Song
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-07-06

3.  Letter to the editor related to the article "Surgical outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy: an 8‑year experience at a single institution" published by Xu et al.

Authors:  Cem Yener; Cenk Sayın; Cihan Inan; Esra Altan; Sinan Ateş; Füsun Varol
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Analysis on clinical effects of dilation and curettage guided by ultrasonography versus hysteroscopy after uterine artery embolization in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.

Authors:  Jian Qiu; Yunfeng Fu; Jiewei Xu; Xiaohong Huang; Guorong Yao; Weiguo Lu
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Uterine Artery Embolization Combined with Subsequent Suction Evacuation as Low-Risk Treatment for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.

Authors:  Roxana Bohiltea; Ionita Ducu; Bianca Mihai; Ana-Maria Iordache; Bogdan Dorobat; Emilia Maria Vladareanu; Stefan-Marian Iordache; Alexia-Teodora Bohiltea; Nicolae Bacalbasa; Cristiana Eugenia Ana Grigorescu; Valentin Varlas
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.