Literature DB >> 24464301

Functional improvement of self-care in the elderly after hip fracture: is age a factor?

Hitendra K Doshi1, Rani Ramason, Josephine Azellarasi, Wai Lim William Chan, Ganesan Naidu.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aging population is growing rapidly in Asia resulting in an increased number of hip fractures being managed surgically. Though there is evidence of improved quality of patient care and outcomes with well-established models of care, we do not know if the functional recovery in activities of daily living among this group of patients is also dependant on age. We hypothesize that there will be a difference in Modified Barthel Index (MBI) scores between the 'older old' (>85 years) and the 'younger old' (<85 years). PATIENT AND METHODS: Hip fracture patients (>60 years) treated surgically were divided into Group A (below 85 years) and Group B (above 85 years). Demographic data, Charlson's Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, time to surgery and length of stay (LOS) were recorded. To assess the recovery in activities of daily living, the MBI scores were measured for the following intervals; pre-fall, at discharge, at 6-month and at 1-year follow-up.
RESULTS: The mean age for Group A (n = 120) was 77 years (60-85) and the mean age for Group B (n = 59) was 91.8 years (86-108). There was no significant difference in the mean CCI (A: 1.14, B: 1.24), mean time to surgery (A: 72.3 h, B: 79.9 h) and mean LOS (A: 10.8 days, B: 10.3 days). The MBI scores were significantly different (P < 0.05) for the pre-injury scores (A = 91.5, B = 84.4); however, there was no significant difference for scores measured at discharge (A = 57.5, B = 52.7), at 6 months (A = 74.6, B = 69.3) and at 1 year (A = 82.2, B = 73.2). Though there was a significant improvement, the scores at 1 year were significantly lower than the pre-injury score for both groups.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that age is not a factor in determining functional recovery with regard to activities of daily living in an integrated model of care for geriatric hip fracture patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24464301     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-014-1924-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  4 in total

Review 1.  A critical review of the long-term disability outcomes following hip fracture.

Authors:  Suzanne M Dyer; Maria Crotty; Nicola Fairhall; Jay Magaziner; Lauren A Beaupre; Ian D Cameron; Catherine Sherrington
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.921

2.  Fixation Versus Replacement in Geriatric Hip Fractures: Does Functional Outcome and Independence in Self-Care Differ?

Authors:  Arul Murugan Palanisamy; H K Doshi; Dahshaini Selvaraj; William Chan; G Naidu; R Ramason
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2015-12

3.  Functional Improvement in Geriatric Hip Fractures: Does Vitamin D Deficiency Affect the Functional Outcome of Patients With Surgically Treated Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures.

Authors:  W R D Seng; M H Belani; R Ramason; G Naidu; H K Doshi
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2015-09

4.  Predictive factors associated with the clinical outcome of intertrochanteric hip fracture in high-risk elderly patients treated with total hip arthroplasty versus percutaneous external fixation.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Jie Zhu; Zaiyang Liu; Yumei Zhang; Yunfei Jin; Min Wang; Xia Zhang; Kaiqi He; Yuan Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.