OBJECTIVE: The false-profile view (FP) is an oblique view of the acetabulum and a true lateral view of femur and joint. It evaluates anterior and posterior hip joint space width (JSW) and anterior acetabular coverage using the vertical-center margin angle (VCA). The biplanar slot scanner (SS) allows simultaneous bilateral acquisitions of oblique views of hip joints. The aim of this work was to compare SS versus FP for the evaluation of VCA and JSW and to test its reproducibility and validity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study of 28 patients (55 hips) with hip pain was performed from November 2011 until May 2012. Two readers measured VCA and JSW. JSW was normalized by the diameter of the femoral head for each technique. The radiation exposure was recorded and compared between the two modalities. Student's t test and the Pearson's correlation assessed the agreement between SS and FP. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the interobserver agreement. RESULTS: The mean VCA angle was 32.1° (± 7.1°) and 30.3° (± 8.5°) with FP and SS, respectively. The coefficient of correlation was 0.90 (p < 0.01). The coefficient of correlation of normalized JSW was 0.83, 0.85, and 0.87 at anterior, vertical, and posterior points, respectively). The ICC was between 0.69 and 0.81 for each modality. The mean radiation exposure was 1.33 (± 0.02) mGy versus 8.69 (±0.04) mGy for FP and SS, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: SS has the potential advantages of simultaneous bilateral acquisition, higher standardization, and is less irradiating. SS is reliable for coxometry.
OBJECTIVE: The false-profile view (FP) is an oblique view of the acetabulum and a true lateral view of femur and joint. It evaluates anterior and posterior hip joint space width (JSW) and anterior acetabular coverage using the vertical-center margin angle (VCA). The biplanar slot scanner (SS) allows simultaneous bilateral acquisitions of oblique views of hip joints. The aim of this work was to compare SS versus FP for the evaluation of VCA and JSW and to test its reproducibility and validity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study of 28 patients (55 hips) with hip pain was performed from November 2011 until May 2012. Two readers measured VCA and JSW. JSW was normalized by the diameter of the femoral head for each technique. The radiation exposure was recorded and compared between the two modalities. Student's t test and the Pearson's correlation assessed the agreement between SS and FP. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the interobserver agreement. RESULTS: The mean VCA angle was 32.1° (± 7.1°) and 30.3° (± 8.5°) with FP and SS, respectively. The coefficient of correlation was 0.90 (p < 0.01). The coefficient of correlation of normalized JSW was 0.83, 0.85, and 0.87 at anterior, vertical, and posterior points, respectively). The ICC was between 0.69 and 0.81 for each modality. The mean radiation exposure was 1.33 (± 0.02) mGy versus 8.69 (±0.04) mGy for FP and SS, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: SS has the potential advantages of simultaneous bilateral acquisition, higher standardization, and is less irradiating. SS is reliable for coxometry.
Authors: Bernd Bittersohl; Joana Freitas; Daniela Zaps; Matthew R Schmitz; James D Bomar; Abd R Muhamad; Harish S Hosalkar Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Emmanuel Maheu; Christian Cadet; Marc Marty; Maxime Dougados; Salah Ghabri; Isabelle Kerloch; Bernard Mazières; Tim D Spector; Eric Vignon; Michel G Lequesne Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2005-10-05 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Benjamin Fritz; Christoph A Agten; Franca K Boldt; Patrick O Zingg; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Reto Sutter Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-03-22 Impact factor: 5.315