Literature DB >> 24463667

Relationship between ultrasound viewing and proceeding to abortion.

Mary Gatter1, Katrina Kimport, Diana Greene Foster, Tracy A Weitz, Ushma D Upadhyay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound scanning is a routine part of preprocedure abortion care, and many health care providers offer patients the opportunity to view their ultrasound images. It has been speculated that ultrasound viewing will dissuade women from having an abortion. We examine whether viewing the image is associated with choosing to continue the pregnancy.
METHODS: Data from medical records for 15,575 visits by women seeking abortion care at a large, urban abortion provider in 2011 were analyzed for factors associated with choosing to continue the pregnancy. All patients received a preprocedure ultrasound scan and were offered the opportunity to view the image.
RESULTS: Patients opted to view the ultrasound image 42.5% of the time. Nearly all pregnancies (98.8%) were terminated: 98.4% of pregnancies among women who viewed their ultrasound images and 99.0% of pregnancies among the patients who did not. Among women with high decision certainty, viewing was not associated with deciding to continue the pregnancy. Viewing was significantly associated with deciding to continue the pregnancy only among the 7.4% of women who reported medium or low decision certainty about having an abortion (adjusted odds ratio 3.21, 95% confidence interval 1.18-8.73).
CONCLUSION: Voluntarily viewing the ultrasound image may contribute to a small proportion of women with medium or low decision certainty deciding to continue the pregnancy; such viewing does not alter decisions of the large majority of women who are certain that abortion is the right decision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24463667     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  3 in total

1.  Evaluating the impact of a mandatory pre-abortion ultrasound viewing law: A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Ushma D Upadhyay; Katrina Kimport; Elise K O Belusa; Nicole E Johns; Douglas W Laube; Sarah C M Roberts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Feature Extraction of Kidney Tissue Image Based on Ultrasound Image Segmentation.

Authors:  Jie Lian; Mingyu Zhang; Na Jiang; Wei Bi; Xiaoqiu Dong
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.682

3.  Viewing the image? Ultrasound examination during abortion preparations, ethical challenges.

Authors:  Marianne Kjelsvik; Ragnhild Jt Sekse; Elin M Aasen; Eva Gjengedal
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.874

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.