Goeril Karlsson1, Gordon Francis, Gideon Koren, Peter Heining, Xiaoli Zhang, Jeffrey A Cohen, Ludwig Kappos, William Collins. 1. From Novartis Pharma AG (G. Karlsson, P.H., W.C.), Basel, Switzerland; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (G.F., X.Z.), East Hanover, NJ; Motherisk Program (G. Koren), Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada; Neurological Institute (J.A.C.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Neurology and Department of Biomedicine (L.K.), University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report outcomes of pregnancies that occurred during the fingolimod clinical development program. METHODS: Pregnancy outcomes from phase II, phase III, and phase IV clinical studies (with optional extensions) were reported by clinical trial investigators. Fingolimod exposure in utero was defined as fingolimod treatment at the time of conception or in the 6 weeks before conception. RESULTS: As of October 31, 2011, 89 pregnancies were reported in completed or ongoing clinical studies, with 74 in fingolimod treatment arms. Of 66 pregnancies with in utero exposure to fingolimod, there were 28 live births, 9 spontaneous abortions, 24 elective abortions, 4 ongoing pregnancies, and 1 pregnancy with an unknown outcome (patient lost to follow-up). Two infants were born with malformations: 1 with congenital unilateral posteromedial bowing of the tibia and 1 with acrania. Elective abortions were performed for 1 case each of tetralogy of Fallot, spontaneous intrauterine death, and failure of fetal development. There were 5 cases (7.6%; 95% confidence interval 3%-17%) of abnormal fetal development in the 66 pregnancies that had in utero exposure to fingolimod. In all 5 cases, fetal exposure to the drug took place in the first trimester of pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The number of patients becoming pregnant during fingolimod therapy remains small and does not permit firm conclusions to be drawn about fetal safety of fingolimod in humans. Given the known risks of teratogenicity in animals and the present data, women of childbearing potential should use effective contraception during fingolimod therapy and for 2 months after discontinuation.
OBJECTIVE: To report outcomes of pregnancies that occurred during the fingolimod clinical development program. METHODS: Pregnancy outcomes from phase II, phase III, and phase IV clinical studies (with optional extensions) were reported by clinical trial investigators. Fingolimod exposure in utero was defined as fingolimod treatment at the time of conception or in the 6 weeks before conception. RESULTS: As of October 31, 2011, 89 pregnancies were reported in completed or ongoing clinical studies, with 74 in fingolimod treatment arms. Of 66 pregnancies with in utero exposure to fingolimod, there were 28 live births, 9 spontaneous abortions, 24 elective abortions, 4 ongoing pregnancies, and 1 pregnancy with an unknown outcome (patient lost to follow-up). Two infants were born with malformations: 1 with congenital unilateral posteromedial bowing of the tibia and 1 with acrania. Elective abortions were performed for 1 case each of tetralogy of Fallot, spontaneous intrauterine death, and failure of fetal development. There were 5 cases (7.6%; 95% confidence interval 3%-17%) of abnormal fetal development in the 66 pregnancies that had in utero exposure to fingolimod. In all 5 cases, fetal exposure to the drug took place in the first trimester of pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The number of patients becoming pregnant during fingolimod therapy remains small and does not permit firm conclusions to be drawn about fetal safety of fingolimod in humans. Given the known risks of teratogenicity in animals and the present data, women of childbearing potential should use effective contraception during fingolimod therapy and for 2 months after discontinuation.
Authors: Ludwig Kappos; Jack Antel; Giancarlo Comi; Xavier Montalban; Paul O'Connor; Chris H Polman; Tomas Haas; Alexander A Korn; Goeril Karlsson; Ernst W Radue Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-09-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Fernando De Maio; Alessandro Corsi; Mario Roggini; Mara Riminucci; Paolo Bianco; Ernesto Ippolito Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: M Sandberg-Wollheim; D Frank; T M Goodwin; B Giesser; M Lopez-Bresnahan; M Stam-Moraga; P Chang; G S Francis Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-08-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: T Saida; S Kikuchi; Y Itoyama; Q Hao; T Kurosawa; K Nagato; D Tang; L Zhang-Auberson; J Kira Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2012-02-21 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Nicole M Gardner; Ronald T Riley; Jency L Showker; Kenneth A Voss; Andrew J Sachs; Joyce R Maddox; Janee B Gelineau-van Waes Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2015-12-29 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Moritz Förster; Patrick Küry; Orhan Aktas; Clemens Warnke; Joachim Havla; Reinhard Hohlfeld; Jan Mares; Hans-Peter Hartung; David Kremer Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 5.606