| Literature DB >> 24463576 |
Yong Guo1, Reiko Fujimura, Yoshinori Sato, Wataru Suda, Seok-won Kim, Kenshiro Oshima, Masahira Hattori, Takashi Kamijo, Kazuhiko Narisawa, Hiroyuki Ohta.
Abstract
The 2000 eruption of Mount Oyama on the island of Miyake (Miyake-jima) created a unique opportunity to study the early ecosystem development on newly exposed terrestrial substrates. In this study, bacterial and fungalEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24463576 PMCID: PMC4041228 DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.me13142
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbes Environ ISSN: 1342-6311 Impact factor: 2.912
Vegetation cover profiles at sites IG1, IG2, and IG3 on Miyake-jima*
| Site | Date | Low grass layer | High grass layer | Shrub layer | Total No. of plant species | Major plants other than | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| Height (m) | Coverage (%) | Height (m) | Coverage (%) | Height (m) | Coverage (%) | ||||
| IG1 | 2009 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | 5 | |
| 2011 | 1 | 45 | — | — | — | — | 6 | ||
| IG2 | 2009 | 0.5 | 10 | 3 | 100 | 6 | 15 | 15 | |
| 2011 | 0.5 | 20 | 3 | 100 | 6 | 25 | 14 | ||
| IG3 | 2009 | 0.7 | 20 | 3 | 100 | 6.5 | 65 | 21 | |
| 2011 | 0.5 | 30 | 3 | 90 | 6.5 | 60 | 21 | ||
The height and percentage cover of each layer were recorded. Miscanthus condensatus (grass) was dominant at all sites. —, not detected.
Chemical and microbiological properties of Miyake-jima volcanic deposits and soils*
| Sample ID | pH | TOC (g kg−1) | TN (g kg−1) | C:N ratio | Water content (%) | TDC (×109 cells g−1) | Bacterial plate count (×106 CFU g−1) on | Fungal propagule (×103 g−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNB | NB | |||||||||
| Volcanic deposit | ||||||||||
| IG1-VD-09 | 4.3 | 0.2 ± 0.0a | 0.2 ± 0.0a | 0.9 | 22 | 0.15 ± 0.02a | 0.10 ± 0.01a | 1.01 ± 0.17a | 0.13 ± 0.01a | ND |
| IG1-VD-11 | 4.7 | 0.2 ± 0.0a | 0.1 ± 0.0a | 1.6 | 25 | 0.53 ± 0.07abc | 0.39 ± 0.02a | 1.26 ± 0.06a | 0.68 ± 0.08a | 0.60 ± 0.09a |
| IG2-VD-09 | 4.3 | 0.5 ± 0.1a | 0.9 ± 0.0a | 0.6 | 21 | 0.37 ± 0.11abc | 0.45 ± 0.05a | 3.37 ± 0.56ab | 1.73 ± 0.18a | ND |
| IG2-VD-11 | 4.5 | 0.3 ± 0.1a | 0.3 ± 0.1a | 0.8 | 26 | 0.57 ± 0.10abc | 0.42 ± 0.01a | 1.18 ± 0.05a | 0.59 ± 0.04a | 0.44 ± 0.03a |
| IG3-VD-09 | 4.2 | 0.3 ± 0.0a | 0.8 ± 0.1a | 0.4 | 23 | 0.25 ± 0.05ab | 0.20 ± 0.02a | 1.22 ± 0.07a | 0.86 ± 0.07a | ND |
| IG3-VD-11 | 4.4 | 0.7 ± 0.0a | 0.5 ± 0.1a | 1.3 | 27 | 0.32 ± 0.06abc | 0.29 ± 0.03a | 1.03 ± 0.05a | 0.85 ± 0.11a | 2.84 ± 0.18ab |
| Buried soil | ||||||||||
| IG1-S-09 | 4.5 | 94.5 ± 4.3d | 7.3 ± 0.1d | 12.9 | 50 | 0.98 ± 0.16bcde | 1.60±0.15b | 11.2 ± 0.9de | 6.90 ± 0.52cd | ND |
| IG1-S-11 | 4.3 | 100.1 ± 1.5d | 8.3 ± 0.6d | 12.1 | 55 | 1.56 ± 0.19e | 2.23±0.11c | 11.7 ± 1.1e | 8.14 ± 0.92d | 16.82 ± 0.54d |
| IG2-S-09 | 4.4 | 69.0 ± 7.5c | 5.3 ± 0.2c | 12.9 | 45 | 1.06 ± 0.03cde | 1.75±0.13b | 9.1 ± 1.1cd | 7.50 ± 0.79cd | ND |
| IG2-S-11 | 4.5 | 60.3 ± 7.1bc | 5.1 ± 0.3bc | 11.9 | 46 | 1.60 ± 0.28e | 1.85±0.11bc | 7.6 ± 0.8cd | 5.46 ± 0.51bc | 9.06 ± 1.90c |
| IG3-S-09 | 4.4 | 62.6 ± 2.2bc | 4.6 ± 0.2bc | 13.6 | 52 | 1.37 ± 0.17de | 1.93±0.13bc | 9.3 ± 1.1cde | 7.95 ± 0.70d | ND |
| IG3-S-11 | 4.6 | 48.9 ± 0.8b | 4.2 ± 0.1b | 11.8 | 44 | 1.41 ± 0.30e | 1.95±0.08bc | 7.0 ± 0.8bc | 4.48 ± 0.32b | 4.87 ± 0.61b |
TOC, total organic carbon; TN, total nitrogen; TDC, total direct count; DNB, 1:100 diluted nutrient broth; NB, nutrient broth; ND, not determined. C:N ratio, the ratio of the sum of TOC and inorganic carbon to TN. Data for TOC, TN, respiratory activity and TDC represent the mean and standard deviation (STD) of triplicate determinations and those for the plate counts the mean and STD of four replicate plates. Different letters indicate significant differences between mean values within a given comparison (MANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test, P <0.05).
−09, sampled in 2009; −11, sampled in 2011.
Fig. 1Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots of bacterial (A) and fungal (B) communities of the volcanic deposit (triangles and diamonds) and soil (circles and squares) samples by weighted UniFrac. Silva bacterial and eukaryotic trees were selected as the reference trees.
Fig. 2Heat map presentations of the 50 most abundant bacterial OTUs (A) and the 30 most abundant fungal OTUs (B) in each sample. The samples and OTUs were clustered on their Bray-Curtis similarities (group-average linkage). The key relates to the untransformed read counts.
Fig. 3Taxonomic classification of the pyrosequencing reads. Classification at the phylum and proteobacterial class level (α, Alphaproteobacteria; β, Betaproteobacteria; γ, Gammaproteobacteria; δ, Deltaproteobacteria; u, unclassified proteobacteria) for total bacterial OTUs (A), family-level classifications of the OTUs belonging to Alphaproteobacteria (B), Betaproteobacteria (C), and Gammaproteobacteria (D), and Actinobacteria (E), and classification of low-abundance OTUs (<1% of total bacterial OTUs in each sample) into bacterial phyla (F). Classification at the phylum level for total fungal reads (G), class-level classifications of the reads of Ascomycota (H) and Basidiomycota (I). △, IG1-VD-09; , IG2-VD-09; ▲, IG3-VD-09; ⋄, IG1-VD-11; , IG2-VD-11; ◆, IG3-VD-11; ○, IG1-S-09; , IG2-S-09; ●, IG3-S-09; □, IG1-S-11; , IG2-S-11; ■, IG3-S-11.
Fig. 4Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) ordination plots of bacterial (A) and fungal (B) communities of six volcanic deposits (triangles and diamonds) and results of the analysis of environmental factors affecting bacterial and fungal distribution, showing significant effects of the colonizer plants. The direction of the arrows for individual plant species indicates an increasing coverage of that plant and the length of the arrows indicates the degree of correlation with the represented axes. The numbers correspond to the bacterial families (A) and fungal classes (B) in the keys on the right and are ranked according to abundance.
Fig. 5Relationship between TOC and respiration per unit amount of organic carbon (TOC).