Literature DB >> 24463494

Surgically relevant localization of the central sulcus with high-density somatosensory-evoked potentials compared with functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Agustina M Lascano1, Frédéric Grouiller, Mélanie Genetti, Laurent Spinelli, Margitta Seeck, Karl Schaller, Christoph M Michel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Resection of abnormal brain tissue lying near the sensorimotor cortex entails precise localization of the central sulcus. Mapping of this area is achieved by applying invasive direct cortical electrical stimulation. However, noninvasive methods, particularly functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), are also used. As a supplement to fMRI, localization of somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) recorded with an electroencephalogram (EEG) has been proposed, but has not found its place in clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: To assess localization accuracy of the hand somatosensory cortex with SEP source imaging.
METHODS: We applied electrical source imaging in 49 subjects, recorded with high-density EEG (256 channels). We compared it with fMRI in 18 participants and with direct cortical electrical stimulation in 6 epileptic patients.
RESULTS: Comparison of SEP source imaging with fMRI indicated differences of 3 to 8 mm, with the exception of the mesial-distal orientation, where variances of up to 20 mm were found. This discrepancy is explained by the fact that the source maximum of the first SEP peak is localized deep in the central sulcus (area 3b), where information initially arrives. Conversely, fMRI showed maximal signal change on the lateral surface of the postcentral gyrus (area 1), where sensory information is integrated later in time. Electrical source imaging and fMRI showed mean Euclidean distances of 13 and 14 mm, respectively, from the contacts where electrocorticography elicited sensory phenomena of the contralateral upper limb.
CONCLUSION: SEP source imaging, based on high-density EEG, reliably identifies the depth of the central sulcus. Moreover, it is a simple, flexible, and relatively inexpensive alternative to fMRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24463494     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  6 in total

1.  All-in-one interictal presurgical imaging in patients with epilepsy: single-session EEG/PET/(f)MRI.

Authors:  Frédéric Grouiller; Bénédicte M A Delattre; Francesca Pittau; Susanne Heinzer; François Lazeyras; Laurent Spinelli; Giannina R Iannotti; Margitta Seeck; Osman Ratib; Maria I Vargas; Valentina Garibotto; Serge Vulliemoz
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Brain networks and their relevance for stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Adrian G Guggisberg; Philipp J Koch; Friedhelm C Hummel; Cathrin M Buetefisch
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Neocortical localization and thalamocortical modulation of neuronal hyperexcitability contribute to Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Ernest V Pedapati; Lauren M Schmitt; Lauren E Ethridge; Makoto Miyakoshi; John A Sweeney; Rui Liu; Elizabeth Smith; Rebecca C Shaffer; Kelli C Dominick; Donald L Gilbert; Steve W Wu; Paul S Horn; Devin K Binder; Martine Lamy; Megan Axford; Craig A Erickson
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-05-11

Review 4.  The perspectives of mapping and monitoring of the sense of self in neurosurgical patients.

Authors:  Karl Schaller; Giannina Rita Iannotti; Pavo Orepic; Sophie Betka; Julien Haemmerli; Colette Boex; Sixto Alcoba-Banqueri; Dorian F A Garin; Bruno Herbelin; Hyeong-Dong Park; Christoph M Michel; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Network modeling of dynamic brain interactions predicts emergence of neural information that supports human cognitive behavior.

Authors:  Ravi D Mill; Julia L Hamilton; Emily C Winfield; Nicole Lalta; Richard H Chen; Michael W Cole
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 9.593

6.  Dysfunctional gaze processing in bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Cristina Berchio; Camille Piguet; Christoph M Michel; Paolo Cordera; Tonia A Rihs; Alexandre G Dayer; Jean-Michel Aubry
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.881

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.