Literature DB >> 24462881

Comparison of the gaseous and particulate matter emissions from the combustion of agricultural and forest biomasses.

Patrick Brassard1, Joahnn H Palacios1, Stéphane Godbout2, Denis Bussières3, Robert Lagacé4, Jean-Pierre Larouche1, Frédéric Pelletier1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare gaseous and particulate matter (PM) emissions from the combustion of agricultural (switchgrass, fast-growing willow and the dried solid fraction of pig manure) and forest (wood mixture of Black Spruce and Jack Pine) biomasses in a small-scale unit (17.58kW). Concentrations of CO2, CO, CH4, NO2, NH3, N2O, SO2, HCl, and H2O were measured by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and converted into emission rates. Opacity was also evaluated and particulates were sampled. Results showed significantly higher emissions of SO2, NO2 and PM with the combustion of agricultural biomass compared to the forest biomass. However, further studies should be carried out so regulations can be adapted in order to permit the combustion of agricultural biomass in small-scale combustion units.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agricultural biomass; Combustion; Gaseous emissions; Particulate matter

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24462881     DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioresour Technol        ISSN: 0960-8524            Impact factor:   9.642


  2 in total

1.  Agricultural waste derived fuel from oil meal and waste cooking oil.

Authors:  Fang-Chih Chang; Ming-Jer Tsai; Chun-Han Ko
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Socioeconomic Drivers of PM2.5 in the Accumulation Phase of Air Pollution Episodes in the Yangtze River Delta of China.

Authors:  Cai-Rong Lou; Hong-Yu Liu; Yu-Feng Li; Yu-Ling Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.