Literature DB >> 24462761

Assessment of the translational value of mouse lupus models using clinically relevant biomarkers.

Andrew T Bender1, Yin Wu1, Qiongfang Cao1, Yueyun Ding1, Judith Oestreicher1, Melinda Genest1, Sandeep Akare1, Sally T Ishizaka2, Matthew F Mackey1.   

Abstract

Lupus is an autoimmune disease with a poorly understood etiology that manifests with a diverse pathology. This heterogeneity has been a challenge to clinical drug development efforts. A related difficulty is the uncertain translational power of animal models used for evaluating potential drug targets and candidate therapeutics, because it is unlikely that any 1 preclinical model will recapitulate the spectrum of human disease. Therefore, multiple models, along with an understanding of the immune mechanisms that drive them, are necessary if we are to use them to identify valid drug targets and evaluate candidate therapies successfully. To this end, we have characterized several different mouse lupus models and report their differences with respect to biomarkers and symptoms that are representative of the human disease. We compared the pristane-induced mouse lupus disease model using 3 different strains (DBA/1, SJL, BALB/c), and the spontaneous NZB x NZW F1(NZB/W) mouse model. We show that the models differ significantly in their autoantibody profiles, disease manifestations such as nephritis and arthritis, and expression of type I interferon-regulated genes. Similar to the NZB/W model, pristane-induced disease in SJL mice manifests with nephritis and proteinuria, whereas the pristane-treated DBA/1 mice develop arthritis and an interferon-driven gene signature that closely resembles that in human patients. The elucidation of each model's strengths and the identification of translatable biomarkers yields insight for basic lupus research and drug development, and should assist in the proper selection of models for evaluating candidate targets and therapeutic strategies.
Copyright © 2014 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24462761     DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2014.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Res        ISSN: 1878-1810            Impact factor:   7.012


  6 in total

1.  Induction of Systemic Autoimmunity by a Xenobiotic Requires Endosomal TLR Trafficking and Signaling from the Late Endosome and Endolysosome but Not Type I IFN.

Authors:  K Michael Pollard; Gabriela M Escalante; Hua Huang; Katarina M Haraldsson; Per Hultman; Joseph M Christy; Rahul D Pawar; Jessica M Mayeux; Rosana Gonzalez-Quintial; Roberto Baccala; Bruce Beutler; Argyrios N Theofilopoulos; Dwight H Kono
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 2.  Linking susceptibility genes and pathogenesis mechanisms using mouse models of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Steve P Crampton; Peter A Morawski; Silvia Bolland
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.758

Review 3.  Thinking BIG rheumatology: how to make functional genomics data work for you.

Authors:  Deborah R Winter
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 5.156

4.  Immunomodulatory Effect of Agave tequilana Evaluated on an Autoimmunity Like-SLE Model Induced in Balb/c Mice with Pristane.

Authors:  Zúlima Jannette Gutiérrez Nava; Antonio Ruperto Jiménez-Aparicio; Maribel Lucila Herrera-Ruiz; Enrique Jiménez-Ferrer
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Functional differences and similarities in activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells by lipopolysaccharide or phytohemagglutinin stimulation between human and cynomolgus monkeys.

Authors:  Zhi Lin; Ying Huang; Hua Jiang; Di Zhang; Yanwei Yang; Xingchao Geng; Bo Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-02

Review 6.  Environmental factors, toxicants and systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Anselm Mak; Sen Hee Tay
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.