Literature DB >> 24462699

Guidance on posterior resin composites: Academy of Operative Dentistry - European Section.

Christopher D Lynch1, Niek J Opdam2, Reinhard Hickel3, Paul A Brunton4, Sevil Gurgan5, Afrodite Kakaboura6, Ann C Shearer7, Guido Vanherle8, Nairn H F Wilson9.   

Abstract

There have been many developments in operative dentistry in recent years, including a progressive shift to the use of resin composites, rather than dental amalgam, in the restoration of posterior teeth. This shift allows the adoption of minimal intervention approaches, thereby helping to conserve and preserve remaining tooth tissues and structures. This paper presents the position of the Academy of Operative Dentistry European Section (AODES) in relation to posterior resin composites. The AODES considers adhesively bonded resin composites of suitable composition and properties to be the "material of choice" for use in direct minimal intervention approaches to the restoration of posterior teeth. In so doing, the AODES emphasises the importance of the practice of evidence-based minimal intervention dentistry, including the use of refurbishment and repair techniques to extend the longevity of restorations. Guidance, based on best available evidence, has been made in relation to certain aspects of resin composite placement techniques in posterior teeth.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Posterior composites; guidelines; operative dentistry; resin composites; restorations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24462699     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  30 in total

1.  Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of posterior high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composite restorations in a high caries incidence population: interim results of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Márcia de Almeida Durão; Ana Karina Maciel de Andrade; Amanda Maciel do Prado; Sirley Raiane Mamede Veloso; Lynn Morena Tavares Maciel; Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende Montes; Gabriela Queiroz de Melo Monteiro
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Class II composite resin restorations: faster, easier, predictable.

Authors:  R D Jackson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Teaching posterior resin composites in UK and Ireland dental schools: do current teaching programmes match the expectation of clinical practice arrangements?

Authors:  C D Lynch; I R Blum; R J McConnell; K B Frazier; P A Brunton; N H F Wilson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  No more amalgams: Use of amalgam and amalgam alternative materials in primary dental care.

Authors:  C D Lynch; D J J Farnell; H Stanton; I G Chestnutt; P A Brunton; N H F Wilson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Does a new formula have an input in the clinical success of posterior composite restorations? A chat study.

Authors:  Sevil Gurgan; Uzay Koc Vural; Zeynep Bilge Kutuk; Filiz Yalcin Cakir
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Clinical long-term success of contemporary nano-filled resin composites in class I and II restorations cured by LED or halogen light.

Authors:  Torsten Pflaum; Stefan Kranz; Regina Montag; Arndt Güntsch; Andrea Völpel; Robin Mills; Klaus Jandt; Bernd Sigusch
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Rechargeable dental adhesive with calcium phosphate nanoparticles for long-term ion release.

Authors:  Ling Zhang; Michael D Weir; Gary Hack; Ashraf F Fouad; Hockin H K Xu
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  N J M Opdam; F H van de Sande; E Bronkhorst; M S Cenci; P Bottenberg; U Pallesen; P Gaengler; A Lindberg; M C D N J M Huysmans; J W van Dijken
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 6.116

9.  Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches.

Authors:  Bruno Baracco; M Victoria Fuentes; Laura Ceballos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM resin composite molar crowns.

Authors:  Fatma A Shembish; Hui Tong; Marina Kaizer; Malvin N Janal; Van P Thompson; Niek J Opdam; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.