Literature DB >> 24462567

A comparison of nonparametric and parametric methods to adjust for baseline measures.

Martin O Carlsson1, Kelly H Zou2, Ching-Ray Yu3, Kezhen Liu4, Franklin W Sun5.   

Abstract

When analyzing the randomized controlled trial, we may employ various statistical methods to adjust for baseline measures. Depending on the method chosen to adjust for baseline measures, inferential results can vary. We investigate the Type 1 error and statistical power of tests comparing treatment outcomes based on parametric and nonparametic methods. We also explore the increasing levels of correlation between baseline and changes from the baseline, with or without underlying normality. These methods are illustrated and compared via simulations.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Analysis of covariance; Covariate imbalance; Percent change from baseline; Randomized controlled trials; Robust regression

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24462567     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  4 in total

1.  Longitudinal study on steroid hormone variations during the second trimester of gestation: a useful tool to confirm adequate foetal development.

Authors:  Silvia Alonso; Sara Caceres; Daniel Vélez; Luis Sanz; Gema Silvan; Maria Jose Illera; Juan Carlos Illera
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Exploration of high-risk factors for pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing postoperative anti-thrombotic therapy among gynecologic oncology surgery: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Tongyu Liu; Shao-Wei Lin; Su Lin; Lin Yang; Haizhou Ji; Jianping Zou; Rong Xie
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-04

3.  N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide: a potential follow-up biomarker of mandibular advancement device efficacy on cardiac function in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Denis Monneret
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-11-20

4.  Accurate prediction of birth implementing a statistical model through the determination of steroid hormones in saliva.

Authors:  Silvia Alonso; Sara Cáceres; Daniel Vélez; Luis Sanz; Gema Silvan; Maria Jose Illera; Juan Carlos Illera
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.