Tae-Wook Kong1, Hyogyeong Park1, Ji-Yoon Cheong1, Sang-Ki Min2, Hee-Sug Ryu3. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: hsryu@ajou.ac.kr.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of analgesia provided by continuous ropivacaine wound infiltration after gynecologic laparoscopy. METHODS:Sixty patients who underwent gynecologic laparoscopy at Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea, between March and May 2012 were randomized to receive either intravenous fentanyl and ketorolac infusion on demand by patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA group, n=31) or continuous wound infiltration of local ropivacaine (CWIgroup, n=29). Postoperative pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were assessed via a visual analog scale. The number of patients who requested rescue analgesia was recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in postoperative pain between the 2 groups, but more patients requested rescue analgesia in the CWI group than in the IV PCA group in 24 hours (18 versus 9 patients, respectively; P=0.010). The PONV scores at 12 and 24 hours were, respectively, 0.28 and 0.27 in the CWI group, and 0.71 and 0.73 in the IV PCA group (P=0.004). Nine patients requested cessation of IV PCA because of severe nausea or vomiting. CONCLUSION: Continuous ropivacaine wound infiltration was found to be as effective as patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain relief after gynecologic laparoscopy. This technique provides good analgesia with less opioid analgesic requirement and few adverse effects.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of analgesia provided by continuous ropivacaine wound infiltration after gynecologic laparoscopy. METHODS: Sixty patients who underwent gynecologic laparoscopy at Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea, between March and May 2012 were randomized to receive either intravenous fentanyl and ketorolac infusion on demand by patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA group, n=31) or continuous wound infiltration of local ropivacaine (CWI group, n=29). Postoperative pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were assessed via a visual analog scale. The number of patients who requested rescue analgesia was recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in postoperative pain between the 2 groups, but more patients requested rescue analgesia in the CWI group than in the IV PCA group in 24 hours (18 versus 9 patients, respectively; P=0.010). The PONV scores at 12 and 24 hours were, respectively, 0.28 and 0.27 in the CWI group, and 0.71 and 0.73 in the IV PCA group (P=0.004). Nine patients requested cessation of IV PCA because of severe nausea or vomiting. CONCLUSION: Continuous ropivacaine wound infiltration was found to be as effective as patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain relief after gynecologic laparoscopy. This technique provides good analgesia with less opioid analgesic requirement and few adverse effects.
Authors: Giuseppe Paladini; Stefano Di Carlo; Giuseppe Musella; Emiliano Petrucci; Paolo Scimia; Andrea Ambrosoli; Vincenza Cofini; Pierfrancesco Fusco Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 3.133