Chelsea Accardo1, Van T Himel1, Thomas E Lallier2. 1. Department of Endodontics, Louisiana State University Health Science Center, Center of Excellence in Oral and Craniofacial Biology, School of Dentistry, New Orleans, Louisiana. 2. Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Health Science Center, Center of Excellence in Oral and Craniofacial Biology, School of Dentistry, New Orleans, Louisiana. Electronic address: tlalli@lsuhsc.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the biocompatibility of a novel formulation of a silicone-based endodontic sealer GuttaFlow 2 (GF2; Coltène/Whaledent, Langenau, Germany) with the original (GFO) and fast-set (GFF) formulations of GuttaFlow and with an epoxy resin sealer, AHPlus Jet (AH+J; Dentsply, York, PA). METHODS: Sealers were set into 3 × 5.5 mm discs. Cell culture media was used to extract leachable products at 24 hours and 1, 2, and 4 weeks. Primary human periodontal ligament fibroblasts were incubated with sealer elutes for 24 hours and evaluated using the 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay and the calcein AM assay. Cell attachment was evaluated on set sealer that was either rinsed or unrinsed with cell media for 1 week. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test. RESULTS: Both calcein and 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assays revealed that periodontal ligament cell viability was reduced on AH+J at 1, 2, and 4 weeks compared with all GuttaFlow sealers. There were no differences in cell viability between the GuttaFlow samples, and all displayed high rates of cell survival at all time periods. After 2 hours, cell attachment to the rinsed GFO and GFF samples exceeded the control, and at 24 hours cell attachment on all GuttaFlow samples exceeded the control. AH+J sealers supported significantly less cell attachment when compared with all GuttaFlow sealers. Cell attachment to set sealers showed better cell attachment when rinsed compared with unrinsed. CONCLUSIONS: GuttaFlow sealers were more biocompatible than AHJ in vitro. The novel GF2 displayed comparable biocompatibility with GFF and GFO.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the biocompatibility of a novel formulation of a silicone-based endodontic sealer GuttaFlow 2 (GF2; Coltène/Whaledent, Langenau, Germany) with the original (GFO) and fast-set (GFF) formulations of GuttaFlow and with an epoxy resin sealer, AHPlus Jet (AH+J; Dentsply, York, PA). METHODS: Sealers were set into 3 × 5.5 mm discs. Cell culture media was used to extract leachable products at 24 hours and 1, 2, and 4 weeks. Primary human periodontal ligament fibroblasts were incubated with sealer elutes for 24 hours and evaluated using the 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay and the calcein AM assay. Cell attachment was evaluated on set sealer that was either rinsed or unrinsed with cell media for 1 week. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test. RESULTS: Both calcein and 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assays revealed that periodontal ligament cell viability was reduced on AH+J at 1, 2, and 4 weeks compared with all GuttaFlow sealers. There were no differences in cell viability between the GuttaFlow samples, and all displayed high rates of cell survival at all time periods. After 2 hours, cell attachment to the rinsed GFO and GFF samples exceeded the control, and at 24 hours cell attachment on all GuttaFlow samples exceeded the control. AH+J sealers supported significantly less cell attachment when compared with all GuttaFlow sealers. Cell attachment to set sealers showed better cell attachment when rinsed compared with unrinsed. CONCLUSIONS: GuttaFlow sealers were more biocompatible than AHJ in vitro. The novel GF2 displayed comparable biocompatibility with GFF and GFO.
Authors: Prajakta Patil; Vishnu P S Rathore; Chetan Hotkar; Snehal S Savgave; K Raghavendra; Priya Ingale Journal: J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Date: 2016 Jul-Aug
Authors: Grzegorz Szczurko; Małgorzata Pawińska; Elżbieta Łuczaj-Cepowicz; Anna Kierklo; Grażyna Marczuk-Kolada; Adam Hołownia Journal: Odontology Date: 2017-12-14 Impact factor: 2.634
Authors: Sergio López-García; Miguel R Pecci-Lloret; Julia Guerrero-Gironés; María P Pecci-Lloret; Adrián Lozano; Carmen Llena; Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Lozano; Leopoldo Forner Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2019-09-22 Impact factor: 3.623