Literature DB >> 24461131

Modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors and European Association for The Study of the Liver criteria using delayed-phase imaging at an early time point predict survival in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma following yttrium-90 radioembolization.

Juan C Camacho1, Nima Kokabi1, Minzhi Xing1, Hasmukh J Prajapati1, Bassel El-Rayes2, Hyun S Kim3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate early imaging prognostic factors in unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) refractory to standard chemotherapy after yttrium-90 ((90)Y) radioembolization therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In an institutional review board-approved prospective correlative study, 21 consecutive patients with ICC refractory to standard chemotherapy underwent (90)Y radioembolization therapy. Target and overall Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST), modified RECIST (mRECIST), and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) treatment responses were assessed. The mRECIST and EASL criteria were modified for application on delayed phases of dynamic contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging studies. Conventional definitions for complete and partial response were applied; these responses comprised objective response. Restaging imaging was obtained at 1- and 3-month intervals until patient death. Survival analyses by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank proportional models including application of the landmark method to avoid lead-time bias were performed from the day of treatment. Significance was set at P < .05.
RESULTS: Median overall survival (OS) from the time of (90)Y therapy was 16.3 months (95% confidence interval, 7.2-25.4 mo). Significant differences between mRECIST and EASL versus RECIST were found when categorizing patients into responders and nonresponders (P < .001). Significantly prolonged OS was observed for patients with targeted objective response based on modified mRECIST and EASL criteria (P = .005 and P = .001, respectively) at 3 months. RECIST was not found to correlate with survival at 1- or 3-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Modified target mRECIST and EASL criteria that employ delayed-phase contrast enhancement at 3 months after (90)Y radioembolization therapy for ICC predicted OS. RECIST did not correlate with survival.
© 2014 Published by SIR on behalf of SIR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CR; EASL; European Association for the Study of the Liver; ICC; PD; PR; RECIST; Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors; complete response; intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; mRECIST; modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors; partial response; progressive disease

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24461131     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.10.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  37 in total

Review 1.  Intra-arterial embolotherapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: update and future prospects.

Authors:  Lynn Jeanette Savic; Julius Chapiro; Jean-François H Geschwind
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 2.  Management of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: how do we decide among the various liver-directed treatments?

Authors:  Eugene J Koay; Bruno C Odisio; Milind Javle; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Christopher H Crane
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.293

3.  Early survival prediction after intra-arterial therapies: a 3D quantitative MRI assessment of tumour response after TACE or radioembolization of colorectal cancer metastases to the liver.

Authors:  Julius Chapiro; Rafael Duran; MingDe Lin; Rüdiger Schernthaner; David Lesage; Zhijun Wang; Lynn Jeanette Savic; Jean-François Geschwind
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Transarterial Chemoembolization and Radioembolization for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma-a Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Cristina Mosconi; Leonardo Solaini; Giulio Vara; Nicolò Brandi; Alberta Cappelli; Francesco Modestino; Alessandro Cucchetti; Rita Golfieri
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 5.  Yttrium-90 hepatic radioembolization: clinical review and current techniques in interventional radiology and personalized dosimetry.

Authors:  Aaron K T Tong; Yung Hsiang Kao; Chow Wei Too; Kenneth F W Chin; David C E Ng; Pierce K H Chow
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Computed tomography imaging assessment of postexternal beam radiation changes of the liver.

Authors:  Michael Lock; Ashkan A Malayeri; Omar Y Mian; Nina A Mayr; Joseph M Herman; Simon S Lo
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.404

7.  Locoregional therapies in cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Peter L Labib; Brian R Davidson; Ricky A Sharma; Stephen P Pereira
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2017-11-17

Review 8.  The role of interventional radiology in the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Anna Maria Ierardi; Salvatore Alessio Angileri; Francesca Patella; Silvia Panella; Natalie Lucchina; Elena N Petre; Antonio Pinto; Giuseppe Franceschelli; Gianpaolo Carrafiello; Gianpaolo Cornalba; Constantinos T Sofocleous
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  Resin-based Yttrium-90 microspheres for unresectable and failed first-line chemotherapy intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: preliminary results.

Authors:  Zhongzhi Jia; Ricardo Paz-Fumagalli; Gregory Frey; David M Sella; J Mark McKinney; Weiping Wang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 10.  Effects of Yttrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy on non-conventional liver tumors.

Authors:  Andrew Kuei; Sammy Saab; Sung-Ki Cho; Stephen T Kee; Edward Wolfgang Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.