Literature DB >> 24461076

Primary cesarean delivery rates, by state: results from the revised birth certificate, 2006-2012.

Michelle Jk Osterman, Joyce A Martin.   

Abstract

Objectives-This report describes state-specific trends in primary cesarean delivery rates from 2006 through 2012 for reporting areas that implemented the 2003 U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth by January 1, 2006, and from 2009 through 2012 for reporting areas that implemented the 2003 revision by January 1, 2009. State-specific changes by gestational age are also explored. Methods-Data for 2006-2012 are based on 100% of singleton births to residents of the reporting areas that implemented the 2003 birth certificate revision by January 1 of each year. Results are not generalizable to the entire United States-the reporting areas do not represent a random sample of U.S. births. Results-The primary cesarean delivery rate for the 2006 reporting area (19 states) increased from 21.9% in 2006 to 22.4% in 2009, and then declined to 21.9% in 2012. For the 2009 reporting area (28 states and New York City), the primary cesarean rate declined from 22.1% to 21.5% during 2009-2012. Rates for 16 of 29 areas declined during 2009-2012; the remaining states were unchanged. By gestational age, state-specific primary cesarean delivery rates at 38 weeks declined for 18 of 29 areas from 2009 to 2012; few state-specific changes were observed at other gestational ages. The primary cesarean delivery rate for the 38 states, District of Columbia, and New York City that were using the revised certificate by January 1, 2012, was 21.5%. State-specific rates ranged from 12.5% (Utah) to 26.9% (Florida and Louisiana). All material appearing in this report is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission; citation as to source, however, is appreciated.

Year:  2014        PMID: 24461076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep        ISSN: 1551-8922


  13 in total

1.  Healthy birth practice #1: let labor begin on its own.

Authors:  Debby Amis
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2014

2.  Validation of Severe Maternal Morbidity on the US Certificate of Live Birth.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Chia-Ling Liu; Hafsatou Diop; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Indications for primary cesarean delivery relative to body mass index.

Authors:  Tetsuya Kawakita; Uma M Reddy; Helain J Landy; Sara N Iqbal; Chun-Chih Huang; Katherine L Grantz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Risk of Autoimmunity in EoE and Families: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kathryn Peterson; Rafael Firszt; John Fang; Jathine Wong; Ken R Smith; Kristina A Brady
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Early Disruption of the Microbiome Leading to Decreased Antioxidant Capacity and Epigenetic Changes: Implications for the Rise in Autism.

Authors:  Rebecca S Eshraghi; Richard C Deth; Rahul Mittal; Mayank Aranke; Sae-In S Kay; Baharak Moshiree; Adrien A Eshraghi
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 5.505

6.  Obstetric and non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy: A 20-year Danish population-based prevalence study.

Authors:  Anne Staub Rasmussen; Christian Fynbo Christiansen; Niels Uldbjerg; Mette Nørgaard
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-19       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development.

Authors:  A J M W Vervoort; L B Uittenbogaard; W J K Hehenkamp; H A M Brölmann; B W J Mol; J A F Huirne
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  The HysNiche trial: hysteroscopic resection of uterine caesarean scar defect (niche) in patients with abnormal bleeding, a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A J M W Vervoort; L F Van der Voet; M Witmer; A L Thurkow; C M Radder; P J M van Kesteren; H W P Quartero; W K H Kuchenbecker; M Y Bongers; P M A J Geomini; L H M de Vleeschouwer; M H A van Hooff; H A A M van Vliet; S Veersema; W B Renes; H S van Meurs; J Bosmans; K Oude Rengerink; H A M Brölmann; B W J Mol; J A F Huirne
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  Paradox lost on the U.S.-Mexico border: U.S. Latinas and cesarean rates.

Authors:  Theresa Morris; Amanda Gomez; Miriam Naiman-Sessions; Christine H Morton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  A cohort study of maternal cardiometabolic risk factors and primary cesarean delivery in an integrated health system.

Authors:  Monique M Hedderson; Fei Xu; Sneha B Sridhar; Emily S Han; Charles P Quesenberry; Yvonne Crites
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.