Literature DB >> 24460995

Sex-specific correlates of adult physical activity in an Australian rural community.

Suzanne Carroll1, Jim Dollman, Mark Daniel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Rural Australians have a higher likelihood of chronic disease and lower levels of physical activity than urban Australians. Little is known of the factors associated with physical activity among rural-dwelling Australians. This study sought to determine the correlates of physical activity among men and women of the South Australian Riverland region.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.
SETTING: Regional area. PARTICIPANTS: There are 299 randomly selected 18-65 year olds. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Determinations of insufficient and sufficient physical activity levels based on public health recommendations.
RESULTS: Using logistic regression: in men, sufficient physical activity was associated with reporting perceived sufficient physical activity for health (odds ratio 3.194 [1.703-5.989]), and having friends who encouraged physical activity (3.641 [1.450-9.141]). Men who reported insufficient time (0.350 [0.151-0.812]) and getting enough physical activity at their job (0.374 [0.199-0.702]) were less likely to be sufficiently active. In women, sufficient physical activity was associated with not being employed (2.929 [1.063-8.066]), higher self-efficacy (2.939 [1.118-7.726]) and having a regular physical activity routine (3.404 [1.829-6.337]). Older age (0.960 [0.929-0.995]), poorer self-rated health (0.233 [0.060-0.900]) and weekend sitting time (0.823 [0.692-0.980]) were negatively associated with sufficient physical activity for women.
CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with physical activity in this rural adult population differed by sex. Sex-specific approaches to promote physical activity might have utility for this population. Strategies to enhance social connectedness among men and encourage physical activity outside of work can be warranted. Women can require programs to help them develop a regular physical activity routine and improve self-efficacy.
© 2014 The Authors. Australian Journal of Rural Health © National Rural Health Alliance Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health promotion; physical activity; rural health; socioecological model

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24460995     DOI: 10.1111/ajr.12081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Rural Health        ISSN: 1038-5282            Impact factor:   1.662


  4 in total

1.  Factors influencing interest in recreational sports participation and its rural-urban disparity.

Authors:  Chiehfeng Chen; Liang-Ting Tsai; Ching-Feng Lin; Chun-Ching Huang; Yao-Tsung Chang; Ruey-Yu Chen; Shu-Yu Lyu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Clinical value of self-assessment risk of osteoporosis in Chinese.

Authors:  Hong-Mei Zhang; Hui-Ling Liu; Xuan Wang; Wei Chen; Dan Chen; Zhong-Zhi Zhang; Han-Ming Wang
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2016-06-23

3.  Student-Led Motivational Interviewing for Physical Activity Promotion among Rural Adults: A Feasibility and Acceptability Trial.

Authors:  Dziano Jenelle; Milanese Emma; Bogomolova Svetlana; Dollman James
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Are people in the bush really physically active? A systematic review and meta-analysis of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in rural Australians populations.

Authors:  Carlos Ivan Mesa Castrillon; Paula R Beckenkamp; Manuela L Ferreira; Jose A Michell; Vania Alice de Aguiar Mendes; Georgina M Luscombe; Emmanuel Stamatakis; Paulo Henrique Ferreira
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.413

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.