CONCLUSION: As a bedside test of subjective visual vertical (SVV), the 'bucket test' has a role as a viable and cost-effective clinical test of unilateral utricular dysfunction in older individuals. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the bucket test as a test of the SVV is a valid bedside test of utricular function in older individuals. METHODS: This was a diagnostic validation study at a tertiary academic medical center. Vestibular function was evaluated using sound-evoked cervical and tap-evoked ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP and oVEMP, respectively) asymmetry ratios, the bucket test of SVV, and the Dizziness Handicap Index (DHI), in 51 older individuals aged 70-95 years. RESULTS: Bucket test scores are correlated in both magnitude and direction with utricle-selective tap-evoked oVEMP asymmetry ratios, but not with sound-evoked cVEMP asymmetry ratios, which are saccule-selective, or with the DHI. Receiver operating characteristics analysis suggests that the bucket test is more specific than sensitive for utricular dysfunction, and a bucket test SVV score of 2° may maximize diagnostic yield relative to the currently accepted score of 3.
CONCLUSION: As a bedside test of subjective visual vertical (SVV), the 'bucket test' has a role as a viable and cost-effective clinical test of unilateral utricular dysfunction in older individuals. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the bucket test as a test of the SVV is a valid bedside test of utricular function in older individuals. METHODS: This was a diagnostic validation study at a tertiary academic medical center. Vestibular function was evaluated using sound-evoked cervical and tap-evoked ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP and oVEMP, respectively) asymmetry ratios, the bucket test of SVV, and the Dizziness Handicap Index (DHI), in 51 older individuals aged 70-95 years. RESULTS: Bucket test scores are correlated in both magnitude and direction with utricle-selective tap-evoked oVEMP asymmetry ratios, but not with sound-evoked cVEMP asymmetry ratios, which are saccule-selective, or with the DHI. Receiver operating characteristics analysis suggests that the bucket test is more specific than sensitive for utricular dysfunction, and a bucket test SVV score of 2° may maximize diagnostic yield relative to the currently accepted score of 3.
Authors: S Iwasaki; L A McGarvie; G M Halmagyi; A M Burgess; J Kim; J G Colebatch; I S Curthoys Journal: Neurology Date: 2007-04-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: S Iwasaki; Y Chihara; Y E Smulders; A M Burgess; G M Halmagyi; I S Curthoys; T Murofushi Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2009-02-10 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Yulia Valko; Stefan C A Hegemann; Konrad P Weber; Dominik Straumann; Christopher J Bockisch Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Stanley Pelosi; Daniel Schuster; Gary P Jacobson; Matthew L Carlson; David S Haynes; Marc L Bennett; Alejandro Rivas; George B Wanna Journal: Am J Otolaryngol Date: 2013-06-04 Impact factor: 1.808