Literature DB >> 24460051

Neuromonitoring changes in pediatric spinal deformity surgery: a single-institution experience.

Joseph Ferguson1, Steven W Hwang, Zachary Tataryn, Amer F Samdani.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Intraoperative monitoring of the spinal cord has become the standard of care during surgery for pediatric spinal deformity correction. The use of both somatosensory and motor evoked potentials has dramatically increased the sensitivity and specificity of detecting intraoperative neurophysiological changes to the spinal cord, which assists in the intraoperative decision-making process. The authors report on a large, single-center experience with neuromonitoring changes and outline the surgical management of patients who experience significant neuromonitoring changes during spinal deformity correction surgery.
METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of all cases involving pediatric patients who underwent spinal deformity correction surgery at Shriners Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, between January 2007 and March 2010. Five hundred nineteen consecutive cases were reviewed in which neuromonitoring was used, with 47 cases being identified as having significant changes in somatosensory evoked potentials, motor evoked potentials, or both. These cases were reviewed for patient demographic data and surgical characteristics.
RESULTS: The incidence of significant neuromonitoring changes was 9.1% (47 of 519 cases), including 6 cases of abnormal Stagnara wake-up tests, of which 4 had corroborated postoperative neurological deficits (8.5% of 47 cases, 0.8% of 519). In response to neuromonitoring changes, wake-up tests were performed in 37 (79%) of 47 cases, hardware was adjusted in 15 (32%), anesthesiology interventions were reported in 5 (11%), hardware was removed in 5 (11%), the patient was successfully repositioned in 3 (6%), and the procedure was aborted in 13 (28%). In 1 of the 4 patients with new postoperative deficits, the deficit had fully resolved by the last follow-up; the other 3 patients had persistent neurological impairment as of the most recent follow-up examination. The authors observed a sensitivity of 100% for intraoperative neuromonitoring.
CONCLUSIONS: Due to the profound risks associated with spinal deformity surgery, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is an integral tool to warn of impending spinal cord injury. Intraoperative neuromonitoring appears to provide a safe and useful warning mechanism to minimize spinal cord injury that may arise during scoliosis correction surgery in pediatric patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24460051     DOI: 10.3171/2013.12.PEDS13188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr        ISSN: 1933-0707            Impact factor:   2.375


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Operative treatment of scoliosis : Preoperative planning, intraoperative monitoring, and postoperative management].

Authors:  C Wimmer; A E Siam; T Pfandlsteiner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Monitoring rate and predictability of intraoperative monitoring in patients with intradural extramedullary and epidural metastatic spinal tumors.

Authors:  H Kang; H S Gwak; S H Shin; M K Woo; I H Jeong; H Yoo; J W Kwon; S H Lee
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Spinal intradural extramedullary tumors: the value of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring on surgical outcome.

Authors:  Ran Harel; David Schleifer; Shmuel Appel; Moshe Attia; Zvi R Cohen; Nachshon Knoller
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Posterior vertebral column resection and intraoperative manual traction to correct severe post-tubercular rigid spinal deformities incurred during childhood: minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Guohua Lü; Bing Wang; Yawei Li; Lei Li; Hong Zhang; Ivan Cheng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Establishing consensus: determinants of high-risk and preventative strategies for neurological events in complex spinal deformity surgery.

Authors:  Rajiv R Iyer; Michael G Vitale; Adam N Fano; Hiroko Matsumoto; Daniel J Sucato; Amer F Samdani; Justin S Smith; Munish C Gupta; Michael P Kelly; Han Jo Kim; Daniel M Sciubba; Samuel K Cho; David W Polly; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Peter D Angevine; Stephen J Lewis; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-02-23

6.  Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring in scoliosis surgery in children.

Authors:  Lakshmi Nagarajan; Soumya Ghosh; David Dillon; Linda Palumbo; Peter Woodland; Priya Thalayasingam; Martyn Lethbridge
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2019-01-25

Review 7.  Incidence and risk factors of neurological complications during posterior vertebral column resection to correct severe post-tubercular kyphosis with late-onset neurological deficits: case series and review of the literature.

Authors:  Wenbin Hua; Xinghuo Wu; Yukun Zhang; Yong Gao; Shuai Li; Kun Wang; Xianzhe Liu; Shuhua Yang; Cao Yang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Severe hypotension with loss of motor evoked potentials during cervical surgery prompting immediate cardiovascular resuscitation.

Authors:  Daniel C Kim; Ethan J Boyd; Thomas A Boyd; Hannah E Granger; Richard P Menger
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-06-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.