Literature DB >> 24458640

Risky ripples allow bats and frogs to eavesdrop on a multisensory sexual display.

W Halfwerk1, P L Jones, R C Taylor, M J Ryan, R A Page.   

Abstract

Animal displays are often perceived by intended and unintended receivers in more than one sensory system. In addition, cues that are an incidental consequence of signal production can also be perceived by different receivers, even when the receivers use different sensory systems to perceive them. Here we show that the vocal responses of male túngara frogs (Physalaemus pustulosus) increase twofold when call-induced water ripples are added to the acoustic component of a rival's call. Hunting bats (Trachops cirrhosus) can echolocate this signal by-product and prefer to attack model frogs when ripples are added to the acoustic component of the call. This study illustrates how the perception of a signal by-product by intended and unintended receivers through different sensory systems generates both costs and benefits for the signaler.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24458640     DOI: 10.1126/science.1244812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  28 in total

Review 1.  Pollution going multimodal: the complex impact of the human-altered sensory environment on animal perception and performance.

Authors:  Wouter Halfwerk; Hans Slabbekoorn
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Dissolved organic carbon and unimodal variation in sexual signal coloration in mosquitofish: a role for light limitation?

Authors:  Sean T Giery; Craig A Layman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Signals, cues and the nature of mimicry.

Authors:  Gabriel A Jamie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Breaking the cipher: ant eavesdropping on the variational trail pheromone of its termite prey.

Authors:  Xiao-Lan Wen; Ping Wen; Cecilia A L Dahlsjö; David Sillam-Dussès; Jan Šobotník
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Tadpole bioacoustics: Sound processing across metamorphosis.

Authors:  Andrea Megela Simmons
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Earless toads sense low frequencies but miss the high notes.

Authors:  Molly C Womack; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Luis A Coloma; Juan C Chaparro; Kim L Hoke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Vocalizations in juvenile anurans: common spadefoot toads (Pelobates fuscus) regularly emit calls before sexual maturity.

Authors:  Leonie Ten Hagen; Ariel Rodríguez; Norbert Menke; Christian Göcking; Michael Bisping; Karl-Heinz Frommolt; Thomas Ziegler; Michael Bonkowski; Miguel Vences
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2016-09-02

Review 8.  Acoustic Pattern Recognition and Courtship Songs: Insights from Insects.

Authors:  Christa A Baker; Jan Clemens; Mala Murthy
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  Collateral damage or a shadow of safety? The effects of signalling heterospecific neighbours on the risks of parasitism and predation.

Authors:  Paula A Trillo; Ximena E Bernal; Michael S Caldwell; Wouter H Halfwerk; Mallory O Wessel; Rachel A Page
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Multimodal cues improve prey localization under complex environmental conditions.

Authors:  F Rhebergen; R C Taylor; M J Ryan; R A Page; W Halfwerk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.