Literature DB >> 24458313

Reassessing provider reporting in the age of electronic surveillance.

Anna G Stachel1, Haena Waechter, Katherine Bornschlegel, Vasudha Reddy, Heather Hanson, Timothy Wen, Jennifer Baumgartner, Sharon Balter.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: In 2000, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention began funding health departments to implement integrated electronic systems for disease surveillance.
OBJECTIVE: Determine the impact of discontinuing provider reporting for chronic hepatitis B and C, hepatitis A, and select enteric diseases.
DESIGN: Laboratory and provider surveillance reports of chronic hepatitis B and C and enteric infections (Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, Campylobacter, Listeria, noncholera Vibrio [eg, Vibrio parahaemolyticus], Salmonella, Shigella, and hepatitis A) diagnosed on January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2010 were compared for completeness and timeliness. Number of cases submitted by laboratories, providers, or both were assessed.
RESULTS: From 2007 to 2010, the proportion of cases reported only by providers for enteric disease infections differed by disease, ranging from 4% (Shiga toxin-producing E coli) to 20% (noncholera Vibrio). For chronic hepatitis C, less than 1% of cases were reported by providers only. The number of complete laboratory reports increased over the time period from 80% to 95% for chronic hepatitis and 92% to 94% for enteric infections. Laboratory reports had higher completion for date of birth, sex, and zip codes. Provider reports had less than 60% completion for race/ethnicity versus 20% for laboratories. Laboratories were faster than providers at reporting chronic hepatitis B (median 4 vs 21 days), chronic hepatitis C (4 vs 18 days), Campylobacter (6 vs 10 days), noncholera Vibrio (11 vs 12 days), Salmonella (6 vs 7 days), Shigella (6 vs 13 days), and hepatitis A (3 vs 8 days); providers were faster than laboratories at reporting Shiga toxin-producing E coli (4 vs 7 days) and Listeria (5 vs 6 days).
CONCLUSIONS: Laboratories reported more cases and their reports were timelier and more complete for all categories except race/ethnicity for chronic hepatitis, Campylobacter, noncholera Vibrio, Salmonella, Shigella, and hepatitis A. For chronic hepatitis, provider reporting could be eliminated in New York City with no adverse effects on disease surveillance. For enteric infections, more work is needed before discontinuing provider reporting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24458313     DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31829d8047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract        ISSN: 1078-4659


  6 in total

1.  Surveillance-Based Estimate of the Prevalence of Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection, New York City, 2016.

Authors:  Miranda S Moore; Angelica Bocour; Ann Winters
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Health Care Provider Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Reporting Diseases and Events to Public Health Authorities in Tennessee.

Authors:  Mary-Margaret A Fill; Rendi Murphree; April C Pettit
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec

3.  Evaluating the Timeliness of Enteric Disease Surveillance in British Columbia, Canada, 2012-13.

Authors:  Eleni Galanis; Marsha Taylor; Kamila Romanowski; Olga Bitzikos; Jennifer Jeyes; Craig Nowakowski; Jason Stone; Michelle Murti; Ana Paccagnella; Sara Forsting; Sophie Li; Linda Hoang
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  HIV and viral hepatitis co-infection in New York City, 2000-2010: prevalence and case characteristics.

Authors:  C Prussing; C Chan; J Pinchoff; L Kersanske; K Bornschlegel; S Balter; A Drobnik; J Fuld
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 4.434

5.  Estimating the prevalence of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in New York City, 2015.

Authors:  A Bocour; S K Greene; F Laraque; A Winters
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 4.434

6.  Timeliness of notification systems for infectious diseases: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Corien Swaan; Anouk van den Broek; Mirjam Kretzschmar; Jan Hendrik Richardus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.