PURPOSE: The implications of undertaking DXA scans using best practice protocols (subjects fasted and rested) or a less precise but more practical protocol in assessing chronic changes in body composition following training and a specialized recovery technique were investigated. METHODS:Twenty-one male cyclists completed anoverload training program, in which they were randomized to four sessions per week of either cold water immersion therapy or control groups. Whole-body DXA scans were undertaken with best practice protocol (Best) or random activity protocol (Random) at baseline, after 3 weeks of overload training, and after a 2-week taper. Magnitudes of changes in total, lean and fat mass from baseline-overload, overload-taper and baseline-taper were assessed by standardization (Δmean/SD). RESULTS: The standard deviations of change scores for total and fat-free soft tissue mass (FFST) from Random scans (2-3%) were approximately double those observed in the Best (1-2%), owing to extra random errors associated with Random scans at baseline. There was little difference in change scores for fat mass. The effect of cold water immersion therapy on baseline-taper changes in FFST was possibly harmful (-0.7%; 90% confidence limits ±1.2%) with Best scans but unclear with Random scans (0.9%; ±2.0%). Both protocols gave similar possibly harmful effects of cold water immersion therapy on changes in fat mass (6.9%; ±13.5% and 5.5%; ±14.3%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: An interesting effect of cold water immersion therapy on training-induced changes in body composition might have been missed with a less precise scanning protocol. DXA scans should be undertaken with Best.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The implications of undertaking DXA scans using best practice protocols (subjects fasted and rested) or a less precise but more practical protocol in assessing chronic changes in body composition following training and a specialized recovery technique were investigated. METHODS: Twenty-one male cyclists completed an overload training program, in which they were randomized to four sessions per week of either cold water immersion therapy or control groups. Whole-body DXA scans were undertaken with best practice protocol (Best) or random activity protocol (Random) at baseline, after 3 weeks of overload training, and after a 2-week taper. Magnitudes of changes in total, lean and fat mass from baseline-overload, overload-taper and baseline-taper were assessed by standardization (Δmean/SD). RESULTS: The standard deviations of change scores for total and fat-free soft tissue mass (FFST) from Random scans (2-3%) were approximately double those observed in the Best (1-2%), owing to extra random errors associated with Random scans at baseline. There was little difference in change scores for fat mass. The effect of cold water immersion therapy on baseline-taper changes in FFST was possibly harmful (-0.7%; 90% confidence limits ±1.2%) with Best scans but unclear with Random scans (0.9%; ±2.0%). Both protocols gave similar possibly harmful effects of cold water immersion therapy on changes in fat mass (6.9%; ±13.5% and 5.5%; ±14.3%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: An interesting effect of cold water immersion therapy on training-induced changes in body composition might have been missed with a less precise scanning protocol. DXA scans should be undertaken with Best.
Authors: Gary Paul McEwan; Franchek Drobnic; Antonia Lizarraga; Antonio Gómez Díaz; Eduard Pons; Antonio Dello Iacon; Viswanath Unnithan Journal: Sports Med Health Sci Date: 2020-09-06
Authors: Rebecca K Randell; Thomas Clifford; Barry Drust; Samantha L Moss; Viswanath B Unnithan; Mark B A De Ste Croix; Naomi Datson; Daniel Martin; Hannah Mayho; James M Carter; Ian Rollo Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-04-12 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Laurie-Anne Marquet; Christophe Hausswirth; Odeline Molle; John A Hawley; Louise M Burke; Eve Tiollier; Jeanick Brisswalter Journal: Nutrients Date: 2016-11-25 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Krzysztof Durkalec-Michalski; Krzysztof Kusy; Natalia Główka; Jacek Zieliński Journal: J Int Soc Sports Nutr Date: 2021-06-14 Impact factor: 5.150