Literature DB >> 24457429

The biocompatibility of silk fibroin and acellular collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering in the ear.

Yi Shen1, Sharon L Redmond, John M Papadimitriou, Bing M Teh, Sheng Yan, Yan Wang, Marcus D Atlas, Robert J Marano, Minghao Zheng, Rodney J Dilley.   

Abstract

Recent experimental studies have shown the suitability of silk fibroin scaffold (SFS) and porcine-derived acellular collagen I/III scaffold (ACS) as onlay graft materials for tympanic membrane perforation repair. The aims of this study were to further characterize and evaluate the in vivo biocompatibility of SFS and ACS compared with commonly used materials such as Gelfoam and paper in a rat model. The scaffolds were implanted in subcutaneous (SC) tissue and middle ear (ME) cavity followed by histological and otoscopic evaluation for up to 26 weeks. Our results revealed that SFS and ACS were well tolerated and compatible in rat SC and ME tissues throughout the study. The tissue response adjacent to the implants evaluated by histology and otoscopy showed SFS and ACS to have a milder tissue response with minimal inflammation compared to that of paper. Gelfoam gave similar results to SFS and ACS after SC implantation, but it was found to be associated with pronounced fibrosis and osteoneogenesis after ME implantation. It is concluded that SFS and ACS both were biocompatible and could serve as potential alternative scaffolds for tissue engineering in the ear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24457429     DOI: 10.1088/1748-6041/9/1/015015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1748-6041            Impact factor:   3.715


  7 in total

Review 1.  Extended release formulations using silk proteins for controlled delivery of therapeutics.

Authors:  Burcin Yavuz; Laura Chambre; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 6.648

2.  Silk fibroin/collagen and silk fibroin/chitosan blended three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Kai Sun; Hui Li; Ruixin Li; Zhenghao Nian; Dong Li; Cheng Xu
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-08-14

Review 3.  Silk Fibroin Scaffolds for Urologic Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Bryan S Sack; Joshua R Mauney; Carlos R Estrada
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Non-mulberry Silk Fibroin Biomaterial for Corneal Regeneration.

Authors:  Sarbani Hazra; Sudip Nandi; Deboki Naskar; Rajdeep Guha; Sushovan Chowdhury; Nirparaj Pradhan; Subhas C Kundu; Aditya Konar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Silk Fibroin as a Functional Biomaterial for Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Weizhen Sun; David Alexander Gregory; Mhd Anas Tomeh; Xiubo Zhao
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Study of magnetic silk fibroin nanoparticles for massage-like transdermal drug delivery.

Authors:  Ai-Zheng Chen; Lin-Qing Chen; Shi-Bin Wang; Ya-Qiong Wang; Jun-Zhe Zha
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-07-21

Review 7.  Tissue Engineering; Current Status & Futuristic Scope.

Authors:  Preeti Sharma; Pradeep Kumar; Rachna Sharma; Vijaya Dhar Bhatt; P S Dhot
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.