Literature DB >> 24456941

Female mice liberated for inclusion in neuroscience and biomedical research.

Brian J Prendergast1, Kenneth G Onishi1, Irving Zucker2.   

Abstract

The underrepresentation of female mice in neuroscience and biomedical research is based on the assumption that females are intrinsically more variable than males and must be tested at each of four stages of the estrous cycle to generate reliable data. Neither belief is empirically based. In a meta-analysis of 293 articles, behavioral, morphological, physiological, and molecular traits were monitored in male mice and females tested without regard to estrous cycle stage; variability was not significantly greater in females than males for any endpoint and was substantially greater in males for several traits. Group housing of mice increased variability in both males and females by 37%. Utilization of female mice in neuroscience research does not require monitoring of the estrous cycle. The prevalence of sex differences at all levels of biological organization, and limitations in generalizing findings obtained with males to females, argue for the routine inclusion of female rodents in most research protocols.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Females; Males; Mice; Sex bias; Sex differences

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24456941     DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  201 in total

1.  Solving for (se)x.

Authors:  Brigitta B Gundersen
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 12.625

Review 2.  Sex Differences in Animal Models: Focus on Addiction.

Authors:  Jill B Becker; George F Koob
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 25.468

3.  Investigation of pre-pubertal sex differences in wheel running and social behavior in three mouse strains.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Gordon; Cynthia Corbitt
Journal:  J Ethol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.270

Review 4.  Synthesizing Views to Understand Sex Differences in Response to Early Life Adversity.

Authors:  Kevin G Bath
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  Tsix-Mecp2 female mouse model for Rett syndrome reveals that low-level MECP2 expression extends life and improves neuromotor function.

Authors:  Lieselot L G Carrette; Roy Blum; Weiyuan Ma; Raymond J Kelleher; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Effects of sex on ethanol conditioned place preference, activity and variability in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice.

Authors:  Christopher L Cunningham; Chloe N Shields
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Sex Differences in Context Fear Generalization and Recruitment of Hippocampus and Amygdala during Retrieval.

Authors:  Ashley A Keiser; Lacie M Turnbull; Mara A Darian; Dana E Feldman; Iris Song; Natalie C Tronson
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Ovariectomy results in inbred strain-specific increases in anxiety-like behavior in mice.

Authors:  Sarah Adams Schoenrock; Daniel Oreper; Nancy Young; Robin Betsch Ervin; Molly A Bogue; William Valdar; Lisa M Tarantino
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-09-29

9.  Alterations in glutamatergic signaling contribute to the decline of circadian photoentrainment in aged mice.

Authors:  Stephany M Biello; David R Bonsall; Lynsey A Atkinson; Penny C Molyneux; Mary E Harrington; Gurprit S Lall
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 4.673

10.  Hormonal and molecular effects of restraint stress on formalin-induced pain-like behavior in male and female mice.

Authors:  Caela C Long; Katelyn E Sadler; Benedict J Kolber
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.