Literature DB >> 24456329

DNA content analysis of colorectal cancer defines a distinct 'microsatellite and chromosome stable' group but does not predict response to radiotherapy.

Wakkas Fadhil1, Karin Kindle, Darryl Jackson, Abed Zaitoun, Nina Lane, Adrian Robins, Mohammad Ilyas.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancers (CRC) are thought to have genetic instability in the form of either microsatellite instability (MSI) or chromosomal instability (CIN). Recently, tumours have been described without either MSI or CIN, that is, microsatellite and chromosome stable (MACS) CRCs. We investigated the (i) frequency of the MACS-CRCs and (ii) whether this genotype predicted responsiveness to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. To examine the frequency of MACS-CRCs, DNA content (ploidy) was examined in 89 sporadic microsatellite-stable CRCs using flow cytometry. The tumours were also screened for mutations in KRAS/BRAF/TP53/PIK3CA by QMC-PCR. To examine the value of tumour ploidy in predicting response to chemoradiotherapy, DNA content was tested in a separate group of 62 rectal cancers treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Fifty-one of 89 CRCs (57%) were aneuploid and 38 (43%) were diploid. There was no significant association between mutations in TP53/KRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA and ploidy. Testing of association between mutations revealed only mutual exclusivity of KRAS/BRAF mutation (P < 0.001). Of the 62 rectal cancers treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, 22 had responded (Mandard tumour regression grade 1/2) and 40 failed to respond (Grade 3-5). Twenty-five of 62 (40%) tumours were diploid, but there was no association between ploidy and response to therapy. We conclude that MACS-CRCs form a significant proportion of microsatellite-stable CRCs with a mutation profile overlapping that of CRCs with CIN. A diploid genotype does not, however, predict the responsiveness to radiotherapy.
© 2014 The Authors. International Journal of Experimental Pathology © 2014 International Journal of Experimental Pathology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal cancer; genomic instability; radiation; tumour ploidy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24456329      PMCID: PMC3919646          DOI: 10.1111/iep.12070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol        ISSN: 0959-9673            Impact factor:   1.925


  45 in total

Review 1.  Consensus report of the task force on standardisation of DNA flow cytometry in clinical pathology. DNA Flow Cytometry Task Force of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

Authors:  M G Ormerod; B Tribukait; W Giaretti
Journal:  Anal Cell Pathol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.916

Review 2.  Classification of colorectal cancer based on correlation of clinical, morphological and molecular features.

Authors:  J R Jass
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 3.  The genetics of HNPCC: application to diagnosis and screening.

Authors:  Wael M Abdel-Rahman; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Päivi Peltomäki
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 6.312

4.  Aberrant Wnt/beta-catenin signaling can induce chromosomal instability in colon cancer.

Authors:  Michel V Hadjihannas; Martina Brückner; Boris Jerchow; Walter Birchmeier; Wolfgang Dietmaier; Jürgen Behrens
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The effect of different TP53 mutations on the chromosomal stability of a human colonic adenoma derived cell line with endogenous wild type TP53 activity, before and after DNA damage.

Authors:  A C Williams; J C Miller; T Collard; S J Browne; R F Newbold; C Paraskeva
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  Prognostic evaluation of DNA flow cytometric and histopathologic parameters of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R Tang; Y S Ho; Y T You; K C Hsu; J S Chen; C R Changchien; J Y Wang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Appropriate partners make good matches.

Authors:  P Karran
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-06-30       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The relationship of pathologic tumor regression grade (TRG) and outcomes after preoperative therapy in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Fabio Maria Vecchio; Vincenzo Valentini; Bruce D Minsky; Gilbert D A Padula; Ennapadam S Venkatraman; Mario Balducci; Francesco Miccichè; Riccardo Ricci; Alessio Giuseppe Morganti; Maria Antonietta Gambacorta; Francesca Maurizi; Claudio Coco
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  DNA ploidy status and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of published data.

Authors:  Sergio E A Araujo; Wanderley M Bernardo; Angelita Habr-Gama; Desiderio R Kiss; Ivan Cecconello
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Pathologic response assessed by Mandard grade is a better prognostic factor than down staging for disease-free survival after preoperative radiochemotherapy for advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  J Suárez; R Vera; E Balén; M Gómez; F Arias; J M Lera; J Herrera; C Zazpe
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 3.788

View more
  1 in total

1.  Impact of specific KRAS mutation in exon 2 on clinical outcome of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-treated colorectal adenocarcinoma patients.

Authors:  Krzysztof Roszkowski; Bogdan Zurawski; Wojciech Jozwicki; Pawel Basta; Marzena Anna Lewandowska
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.074

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.